TSTP Solution File: SYN581-1 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : SYN581-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 11:11:21 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 48.96s 36.75s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 49.06s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :   26
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   43 (  11 unt;  17 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   51 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   53 (  28   ~;  25   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   19 (  11   >;   8   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    7 (   6 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   11 (  11 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   40 (;  40   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ p10 > p7 > p5 > p2 > p12 > p11 > f6 > #nlpp > f9 > f8 > f4 > f3 > c18 > c17 > c16 > c15 > c14 > c13

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(f3,type,
    f3: $i > $i ).

tff(c16,type,
    c16: $i ).

tff(p2,type,
    p2: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(c14,type,
    c14: $i ).

tff(p10,type,
    p10: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(c17,type,
    c17: $i ).

tff(p11,type,
    p11: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(p5,type,
    p5: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(c15,type,
    c15: $i ).

tff(f9,type,
    f9: $i > $i ).

tff(c18,type,
    c18: $i ).

tff(f8,type,
    f8: $i > $i ).

tff(f4,type,
    f4: $i > $i ).

tff(c13,type,
    c13: $i ).

tff(p7,type,
    p7: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(p12,type,
    p12: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(f6,type,
    f6: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(f_29,axiom,
    p2(c18,c14),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_27,axiom,
    ! [X31] : p5(X31,X31),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_133,axiom,
    ! [X25,X26,X27,X28] :
      ( p2(f6(X25,X26),f6(X27,X28))
      | ~ p2(X26,X28)
      | ~ p5(X25,X27) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_59,axiom,
    ! [X23,X24] :
      ( p2(f4(X23),f4(X24))
      | ~ p2(X23,X24) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_25,axiom,
    ! [X18] : p2(X18,X18),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_87,axiom,
    ! [X19,X20,X18] :
      ( p2(X19,X20)
      | ~ p2(X18,X19)
      | ~ p2(X18,X20) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_32,axiom,
    p11(f4(f6(c15,c14)),c16),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_114,axiom,
    ! [X7,X8,X9,X10] :
      ( p11(X7,X8)
      | ~ p2(X9,X7)
      | ~ p2(X10,X8)
      | ~ p11(X9,X10) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_34,axiom,
    ~ p11(f4(f6(c15,c18)),c16),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(c_10,plain,
    p2(c18,c14),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_29]) ).

tff(c_6,plain,
    ! [X31_3] : p5(X31_3,X31_3),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_27]) ).

tff(c_46,plain,
    ! [X25_36,X27_38,X26_37,X28_39] :
      ( ~ p5(X25_36,X27_38)
      | ~ p2(X26_37,X28_39)
      | p2(f6(X25_36,X26_37),f6(X27_38,X28_39)) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_133]) ).

tff(c_28,plain,
    ! [X23_12,X24_13] :
      ( ~ p2(X23_12,X24_13)
      | p2(f4(X23_12),f4(X24_13)) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_59]) ).

tff(c_4,plain,
    ! [X18_2] : p2(X18_2,X18_2),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_25]) ).

tff(c_119,plain,
    ! [X18_78,X20_79,X19_80] :
      ( ~ p2(X18_78,X20_79)
      | ~ p2(X18_78,X19_80)
      | p2(X19_80,X20_79) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_87]) ).

tff(c_141,plain,
    ! [X18_81,X19_82] :
      ( ~ p2(X18_81,X19_82)
      | p2(X19_82,X18_81) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_4,c_119]) ).

tff(c_159,plain,
    ! [X24_13,X23_12] :
      ( p2(f4(X24_13),f4(X23_12))
      | ~ p2(X23_12,X24_13) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_28,c_141]) ).

tff(c_16,plain,
    p11(f4(f6(c15,c14)),c16),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_32]) ).

tff(c_246,plain,
    ! [X9_95,X10_96,X8_97,X7_98] :
      ( ~ p11(X9_95,X10_96)
      | ~ p2(X10_96,X8_97)
      | ~ p2(X9_95,X7_98)
      | p11(X7_98,X8_97) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_114]) ).

tff(c_1789,plain,
    ! [X8_187,X7_188] :
      ( ~ p2(c16,X8_187)
      | ~ p2(f4(f6(c15,c14)),X7_188)
      | p11(X7_188,X8_187) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_16,c_246]) ).

tff(c_1818,plain,
    ! [X7_189] :
      ( ~ p2(f4(f6(c15,c14)),X7_189)
      | p11(X7_189,c16) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_4,c_1789]) ).

tff(c_1865,plain,
    ! [X23_190] :
      ( p11(f4(X23_190),c16)
      | ~ p2(X23_190,f6(c15,c14)) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_159,c_1818]) ).

tff(c_148871,plain,
    ! [X25_1599,X26_1600] :
      ( p11(f4(f6(X25_1599,X26_1600)),c16)
      | ~ p5(X25_1599,c15)
      | ~ p2(X26_1600,c14) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_46,c_1865]) ).

tff(c_18,plain,
    ~ p11(f4(f6(c15,c18)),c16),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_34]) ).

tff(c_148876,plain,
    ( ~ p5(c15,c15)
    | ~ p2(c18,c14) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_148871,c_18]) ).

tff(c_148881,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_10,c_6,c_148876]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : SYN581-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.18/0.34  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.18/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.18/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.18/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.18/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.18/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.18/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.18/0.34  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 17:14:48 EDT 2023
% 0.18/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 48.96/36.75  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 48.96/36.76  
% 48.96/36.76  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 49.06/36.78  
% 49.06/36.78  Inference rules
% 49.06/36.78  ----------------------
% 49.06/36.78  #Ref     : 0
% 49.06/36.78  #Sup     : 42035
% 49.06/36.79  #Fact    : 22
% 49.06/36.79  #Define  : 0
% 49.06/36.79  #Split   : 128
% 49.06/36.79  #Chain   : 0
% 49.06/36.79  #Close   : 0
% 49.06/36.79  
% 49.06/36.79  Ordering : KBO
% 49.06/36.79  
% 49.06/36.79  Simplification rules
% 49.06/36.79  ----------------------
% 49.06/36.79  #Subsume      : 9196
% 49.06/36.79  #Demod        : 4586
% 49.06/36.79  #Tautology    : 1574
% 49.06/36.79  #SimpNegUnit  : 537
% 49.06/36.79  #BackRed      : 0
% 49.06/36.79  
% 49.06/36.79  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 49.06/36.79  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 49.06/36.79  
% 49.06/36.79  Timing (in seconds)
% 49.06/36.79  ----------------------
% 49.06/36.79  Preprocessing        : 0.47
% 49.06/36.79  Parsing              : 0.26
% 49.06/36.79  CNF conversion       : 0.03
% 49.06/36.79  Main loop            : 35.28
% 49.06/36.79  Inferencing          : 3.02
% 49.06/36.79  Reduction            : 7.43
% 49.06/36.79  Demodulation         : 4.04
% 49.06/36.79  BG Simplification    : 0.19
% 49.06/36.79  Subsumption          : 21.09
% 49.06/36.79  Abstraction          : 0.28
% 49.06/36.79  MUC search           : 0.00
% 49.06/36.79  Cooper               : 0.00
% 49.06/36.79  Total                : 35.79
% 49.06/36.79  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 49.06/36.79  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 49.06/36.79  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 49.06/36.79  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------