TSTP Solution File: SYN579-1 by CSE---1.6
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE---1.6
% Problem : SYN579-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 1 01:46:28 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.54s 0.61s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.54s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : SYN579-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.12/0.12 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sat Aug 26 21:02:35 EDT 2023
% 0.18/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.54 start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.54/0.60 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.54/0.60 % File :CSE---1.6
% 0.54/0.60 % Problem :theBenchmark
% 0.54/0.60 % Transform :cnf
% 0.54/0.60 % Format :tptp:raw
% 0.54/0.60 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.54/0.60
% 0.54/0.60 % Result :Theorem 0.010000s
% 0.54/0.60 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.010000s
% 0.54/0.60 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.54/0.60 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.54/0.60 % File : SYN579-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.54/0.60 % Domain : Syntactic
% 0.54/0.60 % Problem : Harrison problem 3330
% 0.54/0.60 % Version : Especial.
% 0.54/0.60 % English :
% 0.54/0.60
% 0.54/0.60 % Refs : [Har01] Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 0.54/0.60 % Source : [Har01]
% 0.54/0.60 % Names :
% 0.54/0.60
% 0.54/0.60 % Status : Unsatisfiable
% 0.54/0.60 % Rating : 0.00 v7.1.0, 0.17 v7.0.0, 0.12 v6.3.0, 0.00 v2.5.0
% 0.54/0.60 % Syntax : Number of clauses : 23 ( 9 unt; 1 nHn; 17 RR)
% 0.54/0.60 % Number of literals : 50 ( 0 equ; 27 neg)
% 0.54/0.60 % Maximal clause size : 4 ( 2 avg)
% 0.54/0.60 % Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% 0.54/0.60 % Number of predicates : 6 ( 6 usr; 0 prp; 2-2 aty)
% 0.54/0.60 % Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 5 con; 0-2 aty)
% 0.54/0.60 % Number of variables : 42 ( 0 sgn)
% 0.54/0.60 % SPC : CNF_UNS_RFO_NEQ_NHN
% 0.54/0.60
% 0.54/0.60 % Comments :
% 0.54/0.60 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.54/0.60 cnf(p10_1,negated_conjecture,
% 0.54/0.60 p10(X0,X0) ).
% 0.54/0.60
% 0.54/0.60 cnf(p7_2,negated_conjecture,
% 0.54/0.60 p7(X21,X21) ).
% 0.54/0.60
% 0.54/0.60 cnf(p3_3,negated_conjecture,
% 0.54/0.60 p3(X12,X12) ).
% 0.54/0.60
% 0.54/0.61 cnf(p2_4,negated_conjecture,
% 0.54/0.61 p2(X7,X7) ).
% 0.54/0.61
% 0.54/0.61 cnf(p9_5,negated_conjecture,
% 0.54/0.61 p9(c12,c13) ).
% 0.54/0.61
% 0.54/0.61 cnf(p11_6,negated_conjecture,
% 0.54/0.61 p11(c14,c15) ).
% 0.54/0.61
% 0.54/0.61 cnf(p2_7,negated_conjecture,
% 0.54/0.61 p2(c16,f5(c14)) ).
% 0.54/0.61
% 0.54/0.61 cnf(p3_8,negated_conjecture,
% 0.54/0.61 p3(f4(f5(X17)),f4(X17)) ).
% 0.54/0.61
% 0.54/0.61 cnf(p3_9,negated_conjecture,
% 0.54/0.61 p3(f6(f5(X20)),f6(X20)) ).
% 0.54/0.61
% 0.54/0.61 cnf(p9_10,negated_conjecture,
% 0.54/0.61 ( p9(X32,c13)
% 0.54/0.61 | ~ p9(X32,f6(c16)) ) ).
% 0.54/0.61
% 0.54/0.61 cnf(p9_11,negated_conjecture,
% 0.54/0.61 ( p9(X32,f6(c16))
% 0.54/0.61 | ~ p9(X32,c13) ) ).
% 0.54/0.61
% 0.54/0.61 cnf(p2_12,negated_conjecture,
% 0.54/0.61 ( p2(f5(X10),f5(X11))
% 0.54/0.61 | ~ p2(X10,X11) ) ).
% 0.54/0.61
% 0.54/0.61 cnf(p3_13,negated_conjecture,
% 0.54/0.61 ( p3(f6(X18),f6(X19))
% 0.54/0.61 | ~ p2(X18,X19) ) ).
% 0.54/0.61
% 0.54/0.61 cnf(p3_14,negated_conjecture,
% 0.54/0.61 ( p3(f4(X15),f4(X16))
% 0.54/0.61 | ~ p2(X15,X16) ) ).
% 0.54/0.61
% 0.54/0.61 cnf(p10_15,negated_conjecture,
% 0.54/0.61 ( p10(X1,X2)
% 0.54/0.61 | ~ p10(X0,X1)
% 0.54/0.61 | ~ p10(X0,X2) ) ).
% 0.54/0.61
% 0.54/0.61 cnf(p7_16,negated_conjecture,
% 0.54/0.61 ( p7(X22,X23)
% 0.54/0.61 | ~ p7(X21,X22)
% 0.54/0.61 | ~ p7(X21,X23) ) ).
% 0.54/0.61
% 0.54/0.61 cnf(p3_17,negated_conjecture,
% 0.54/0.61 ( p3(X13,X14)
% 0.54/0.61 | ~ p3(X12,X13)
% 0.54/0.61 | ~ p3(X12,X14) ) ).
% 0.54/0.61
% 0.54/0.61 cnf(p2_18,negated_conjecture,
% 0.54/0.61 ( p2(X8,X9)
% 0.54/0.61 | ~ p2(X7,X8)
% 0.54/0.61 | ~ p2(X7,X9) ) ).
% 0.54/0.61
% 0.54/0.61 cnf(p11_19,negated_conjecture,
% 0.54/0.61 ( p11(X3,X4)
% 0.54/0.61 | ~ p11(X6,X5)
% 0.54/0.61 | ~ p2(X6,X3)
% 0.54/0.61 | ~ p10(X5,X4) ) ).
% 0.54/0.61
% 0.54/0.61 cnf(p9_20,negated_conjecture,
% 0.54/0.61 ( p9(X28,X29)
% 0.54/0.61 | ~ p7(X31,X28)
% 0.54/0.61 | ~ p9(X31,X30)
% 0.54/0.61 | ~ p3(X30,X29) ) ).
% 0.54/0.61
% 0.54/0.61 cnf(p7_21,negated_conjecture,
% 0.54/0.61 ( p7(f8(X24,X25),f8(X26,X27))
% 0.54/0.61 | ~ p2(X25,X27)
% 0.54/0.61 | ~ p3(X24,X26) ) ).
% 0.54/0.61
% 0.54/0.61 cnf(p9_22,negated_conjecture,
% 0.54/0.61 ( p9(f8(X33,X34),X33)
% 0.54/0.61 | p9(f8(X33,X34),f6(X34))
% 0.54/0.61 | ~ p11(X34,c15)
% 0.54/0.61 | ~ p9(c12,X33) ) ).
% 0.54/0.61
% 0.54/0.61 cnf(not_p11_23,negated_conjecture,
% 0.54/0.61 ( ~ p11(X34,c15)
% 0.54/0.61 | ~ p9(c12,X33)
% 0.54/0.61 | ~ p9(f8(X33,X34),X33)
% 0.54/0.61 | ~ p9(f8(X33,X34),f6(X34)) ) ).
% 0.54/0.61
% 0.54/0.61 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.54/0.61 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.54/0.61 % Proof found
% 0.54/0.61 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.54/0.61 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.54/0.61 %ClaNum:23(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.54/0.61 %VarNum:92(SingletonVarNum:42)
% 0.54/0.61 %MaxLitNum:4
% 0.54/0.61 %MaxfuncDepth:2
% 0.54/0.61 %SharedTerms:10
% 0.54/0.61 %goalClause: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
% 0.54/0.61 %singleGoalClaCount:9
% 0.54/0.61 [1]P1(a1,a2)
% 0.54/0.61 [2]P2(a3,a4)
% 0.54/0.61 [7]P6(a5,f6(a3))
% 0.54/0.61 [3]P3(x31,x31)
% 0.54/0.61 [4]P4(x41,x41)
% 0.54/0.61 [5]P5(x51,x51)
% 0.54/0.61 [6]P6(x61,x61)
% 0.54/0.61 [8]P5(f7(f6(x81)),f7(x81))
% 0.54/0.61 [9]P5(f8(f6(x91)),f8(x91))
% 0.54/0.61 [10]~P1(x101,a2)+P1(x101,f8(a5))
% 0.54/0.61 [11]P1(x111,a2)+~P1(x111,f8(a5))
% 0.54/0.61 [12]~P6(x121,x122)+P5(f7(x121),f7(x122))
% 0.54/0.61 [13]~P6(x131,x132)+P5(f8(x131),f8(x132))
% 0.54/0.61 [14]~P6(x141,x142)+P6(f6(x141),f6(x142))
% 0.54/0.61 [15]~P3(x153,x151)+P3(x151,x152)+~P3(x153,x152)
% 0.54/0.61 [16]~P4(x163,x161)+P4(x161,x162)+~P4(x163,x162)
% 0.54/0.61 [17]~P5(x173,x171)+P5(x171,x172)+~P5(x173,x172)
% 0.54/0.61 [18]~P6(x183,x181)+P6(x181,x182)+~P6(x183,x182)
% 0.54/0.61 [21]~P5(x211,x213)+~P6(x212,x214)+P4(f9(x211,x212),f9(x213,x214))
% 0.54/0.61 [22]~P2(x222,a4)+~P1(a1,x221)+P1(f9(x221,x222),x221)+P1(f9(x221,x222),f8(x222))
% 0.54/0.61 [23]~P1(f9(x232,x231),x232)+~P1(f9(x232,x231),f8(x231))+~P2(x231,a4)+~P1(a1,x232)
% 0.54/0.61 [19]~P1(x193,x194)+P1(x191,x192)+~P4(x193,x191)+~P5(x194,x192)
% 0.54/0.61 [20]~P2(x204,x203)+P2(x201,x202)+~P3(x203,x202)+~P6(x204,x201)
% 0.54/0.61 %EqnAxiom
% 0.54/0.61
% 0.54/0.61 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.54/0.61 cnf(32,plain,
% 0.54/0.61 (P1(a1,f8(f6(a3)))),
% 0.54/0.61 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,3,4,7,10,14,13,12,20,19])).
% 0.54/0.61 cnf(34,plain,
% 0.54/0.61 (P4(f9(x341,a5),f9(x341,f6(a3)))),
% 0.54/0.61 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,3,4,5,7,10,14,13,12,20,19,21])).
% 0.54/0.61 cnf(41,plain,
% 0.54/0.61 (P1(a1,f8(a3))),
% 0.54/0.61 inference(scs_inference,[],[8,9,4,5,32,17,19])).
% 0.54/0.61 cnf(80,plain,
% 0.54/0.61 (P1(f9(f8(a3),a3),f8(a3))),
% 0.54/0.61 inference(scs_inference,[],[41,2,22])).
% 0.54/0.61 cnf(88,plain,
% 0.54/0.61 ($false),
% 0.54/0.61 inference(scs_inference,[],[80,34,41,4,2,16,23]),
% 0.54/0.61 ['proof']).
% 0.54/0.61 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.54/0.61 % Total time :0.010000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------