TSTP Solution File: SYN576-1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : SYN576-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 12:14:15 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 2.06s 2.26s
% Output : Refutation 2.06s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SYN576-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 12:26:04 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.36 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.12/0.36 The process was started by sandbox on n014.cluster.edu,
% 0.12/0.36 Mon Jul 11 12:26:04 2022
% 0.12/0.36 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 14514.
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.12/0.36 set(auto).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.12/0.36 clear(print_given).
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 list(usable).
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=4.
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 This is a non-Horn set without equality. The strategy
% 0.12/0.36 will be ordered hyper_res, ur_res, unit deletion, and
% 0.12/0.36 factoring, with satellites in sos and nuclei in usable.
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 ------------> process usable:
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 ------------> process sos:
% 0.12/0.36 24 back subsumes 15.
% 0.12/0.36 25 back subsumes 16.
% 0.12/0.36 26 back subsumes 17.
% 0.12/0.36 27 back subsumes 18.
% 0.12/0.36 30 back subsumes 19.
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.63/0.86
% 0.63/0.86 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.63/0.86
% 0.63/0.86
% 0.63/0.86 Failed to model usable list: disabling FINDER
% 0.63/0.86
% 0.63/0.86
% 0.63/0.86
% 0.63/0.86 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.63/0.86
% 0.63/0.86 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.63/0.86 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.63/0.86 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.63/0.86 number of clauses in intial UL: 18
% 0.63/0.86 number of clauses initially in problem: 27
% 0.63/0.86 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 66
% 0.63/0.86 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.63/0.86 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.63/0.86 absolute distinct symbol count: 15
% 0.63/0.86 distinct predicate count: 6
% 0.63/0.86 distinct function count: 5
% 0.63/0.86 distinct constant count: 4
% 0.63/0.86
% 0.63/0.86 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.63/0.86
% 0.63/0.86
% 0.63/0.86
% 0.63/0.86 =========== start of search ===========
% 0.93/1.15
% 0.93/1.15
% 0.93/1.15 Changing weight limit from 60 to 31.
% 0.93/1.15
% 0.93/1.15 Resetting weight limit to 31 after 100 givens.
% 0.93/1.15
% 1.07/1.24
% 1.07/1.24
% 1.07/1.24 Changing weight limit from 31 to 30.
% 1.07/1.24
% 1.07/1.24 Resetting weight limit to 30 after 105 givens.
% 1.07/1.24
% 1.15/1.31
% 1.15/1.31
% 1.15/1.31 Changing weight limit from 30 to 29.
% 1.15/1.31
% 1.15/1.31 Resetting weight limit to 29 after 110 givens.
% 1.15/1.31
% 1.33/1.52
% 1.33/1.52
% 1.33/1.52 Changing weight limit from 29 to 28.
% 1.33/1.52
% 1.33/1.52 Resetting weight limit to 28 after 135 givens.
% 1.33/1.52
% 1.53/1.76
% 1.53/1.76
% 1.53/1.76 Changing weight limit from 28 to 27.
% 1.53/1.76
% 1.53/1.76 Resetting weight limit to 27 after 180 givens.
% 1.53/1.76
% 2.06/2.26
% 2.06/2.26 -------- PROOF --------
% 2.06/2.26 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 2.06/2.26 % SZS output start Refutation
% 2.06/2.26
% 2.06/2.26 ----> UNIT CONFLICT at 1.81 sec ----> 12631 [binary,12630.1,9.1] {-} $F.
% 2.06/2.26
% 2.06/2.26 Length of proof is 7. Level of proof is 4.
% 2.06/2.26
% 2.06/2.26 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 2.06/2.26 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 2.06/2.26 % SZS output start Refutation
% 2.06/2.26
% 2.06/2.26 8 [] {+} p12(A,B)| -p2(C,A)| -p5(D,B)| -p12(C,D).
% 2.06/2.26 9 [] {+} -p12(f7(f9(c13,c14,f3(c15,c16)),f3(c15,c16)),f6(c13)).
% 2.06/2.26 11 [] {+} p2(f7(A,B),f7(C,D))| -p2(A,C)| -p2(B,D).
% 2.06/2.26 12 [] {+} p2(f9(A,B,C),f9(D,E,F))| -p4(A,D)| -p8(B,E)| -p2(C,F).
% 2.06/2.26 14 [] {+} p12(f7(f9(A,c14,f3(B,C)),f3(B,C)),f6(A))| -p12(C,f6(A))| -p12(B,f6(A))| -p11(f10(B),f10(C)).
% 2.06/2.26 24 [] {-} p8(A,A).
% 2.06/2.26 25 [] {-} p2(A,A).
% 2.06/2.26 26 [] {-} p4(A,A).
% 2.06/2.26 27 [] {-} p5(A,A).
% 2.06/2.26 28 [] {-} p12(c15,f6(c13)).
% 2.06/2.26 29 [] {-} p12(c16,f6(c13)).
% 2.06/2.26 30 [] {-} p11(A,B)|p11(B,A).
% 2.06/2.26 31 [] {-} p2(f3(A,B),f3(B,A)).
% 2.06/2.26 37 [hyper,30,14,29,28,unit_del,9] {-} p11(f10(c16),f10(c15)).
% 2.06/2.26 40 [hyper,37,14,28,29] {-} p12(f7(f9(c13,c14,f3(c16,c15)),f3(c16,c15)),f6(c13)).
% 2.06/2.26 44 [hyper,31,12,26,24] {-} p2(f9(A,B,f3(C,D)),f9(A,B,f3(D,C))).
% 2.06/2.26 46 [hyper,31,11,25] {-} p2(f7(A,f3(B,C)),f7(A,f3(C,B))).
% 2.06/2.26 356 [hyper,40,8,46,27] {-} p12(f7(f9(c13,c14,f3(c16,c15)),f3(c15,c16)),f6(c13)).
% 2.06/2.26 376 [hyper,44,11,25] {-} p2(f7(f9(A,B,f3(C,D)),E),f7(f9(A,B,f3(D,C)),E)).
% 2.06/2.26 12630 [hyper,376,8,27,356] {-} p12(f7(f9(c13,c14,f3(c15,c16)),f3(c15,c16)),f6(c13)).
% 2.06/2.26 12631 [binary,12630.1,9.1] {-} $F.
% 2.06/2.26
% 2.06/2.26 % SZS output end Refutation
% 2.06/2.26 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 2.06/2.26
% 2.06/2.26
% 2.06/2.26 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 2.06/2.26
% 2.06/2.26
% 2.06/2.26 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 2.06/2.26
% 2.06/2.26 ============ end of search ============
% 2.06/2.26
% 2.06/2.26 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 2.06/2.26
% 2.06/2.26 Process 14514 finished Mon Jul 11 12:26:06 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------