TSTP Solution File: SYN569-1 by SNARK---20120808r022
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem : SYN569-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run-snark %s %d
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 12:01:45 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.61s 0.79s
% Output : Refutation 0.61s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 11
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 19 ( 13 unt; 0 nHn; 17 RR)
% Number of literals : 30 ( 0 equ; 13 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 5 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 17 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(p2_1,negated_conjecture,
p2(X,X),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p2_1) ).
cnf(p8_3,negated_conjecture,
p8(c14,c12),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p8_3) ).
cnf(p8_5,negated_conjecture,
p8(c11,c14),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p8_5) ).
cnf(p9_6,negated_conjecture,
p9(c13,c15,c14),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p9_6) ).
cnf(p10_7,negated_conjecture,
( p10(X,Y)
| ~ p8(X,Y) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p10_7) ).
cnf(p2_10,negated_conjecture,
( p2(X,Y)
| ~ p2(Z,X)
| ~ p2(Z,Y) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p2_10) ).
cnf(p2_11,negated_conjecture,
( p2(X,Y)
| ~ p9(Z,X,U)
| ~ p9(Z,Y,U) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p2_11) ).
cnf(p9_12,negated_conjecture,
( p9(c13,f3(X),X)
| ~ p10(X,c12)
| ~ p10(c11,X) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p9_12) ).
cnf(p2_15,negated_conjecture,
p2(f5(f7(c13,c12),f7(c13,c11)),f4(f5(c12,c11),c15)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p2_15) ).
cnf(p2_16,negated_conjecture,
( p2(f4(X,Y),f4(Z,U))
| ~ p2(X,Z)
| ~ p2(Y,U) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p2_16) ).
cnf(not_p8_20,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p8(X,c12)
| ~ p8(c11,X)
| ~ p2(f5(f7(c13,c12),f7(c13,c11)),f4(f5(c12,c11),f3(X))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',not_p8_20) ).
cnf(21,plain,
p10(c14,c12),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[p10_7,p8_3]) ).
cnf(23,plain,
p10(c11,c14),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[p10_7,p8_5]) ).
cnf(24,plain,
p2(f4(f5(c12,c11),c15),f5(f7(c13,c12),f7(c13,c11))),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[p2_10,p2_15,p2_1]) ).
cnf(33,plain,
~ p2(f5(f7(c13,c12),f7(c13,c11)),f4(f5(c12,c11),f3(c14))),
inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[not_p8_20,p8_3,p8_5]) ).
cnf(34,plain,
p9(c13,f3(c14),c14),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[p9_12,23,21]) ).
cnf(36,plain,
p2(c15,f3(c14)),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[p2_11,34,p9_6]) ).
cnf(54,plain,
p2(f4(X,c15),f4(X,f3(c14))),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[p2_16,36,p2_1]) ).
cnf(1226,plain,
$false,
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[p2_10,24,54]),33]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.13 % Problem : SYN569-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : run-snark %s %d
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 21:15:28 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.47 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/0.48 *
% 0.21/0.48 *
% 0.21/0.49 #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.21/0.49 *
% 0.21/0.49 SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.21/0.49 *
% 0.21/0.49 ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.21/0.49 (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.21/0.49 (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.21/0.49 (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.21/0.49 (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.21/0.49 (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.21/0.49 (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.21/0.49 (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.21/0.49 (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.21/0.49 (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.21/0.49 (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.21/0.49 (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.21/0.49 (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.21/0.49 *
% 0.21/0.49 "."
% 0.21/0.49 *
% 0.21/0.49 ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-11T21:15:28
% 0.21/0.49 ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n020.cluster.edu at 2022-07-11T21:15:28
% 0.61/0.79
% 0.61/0.79
% 0.61/0.79 #||
% 0.61/0.79 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.61/0.79 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.61/0.79 ||#
% 0.61/0.79
% 0.61/0.79 ; Summary of computation:
% 0.61/0.79 ; 3047 formulas have been input or derived (from 48 formulas).
% 0.61/0.79 ; 1226 (40%) were retained. Of these,
% 0.61/0.79 ; 1226 (100%) are still being kept.
% 0.61/0.79 ;
% 0.61/0.79 ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 0.61/0.79 ; 0.004 1% Read assertion file (1 call)
% 0.61/0.79 ; 0.001 0% Assert (20 calls)
% 0.61/0.79 ; 0.111 37% Process new row (2,753 calls)
% 0.61/0.79 ; 0.088 29% Resolution (94 calls)
% 0.61/0.79 ; 0.000 0% Paramodulation (47 calls)
% 0.61/0.79 ; 0.000 0% Condensing (13 calls)
% 0.61/0.79 ; 0.000 0% Forward subsumption (13 calls)
% 0.61/0.79 ; 0.001 0% Backward subsumption (13 calls)
% 0.61/0.79 ; 0.000 0% Clause clause subsumption (2 calls)
% 0.61/0.79 ; 0.050 17% Forward simplification (2,753 calls)
% 0.61/0.79 ; 0.013 4% Backward simplification (1,226 calls)
% 0.61/0.79 ; 0.001 0% Sortal reasoning (32 calls)
% 0.61/0.79 ; 0.000 0% Purity testing (1 call)
% 0.61/0.79 ; 0.030 10% Other
% 0.61/0.79 ; 0.299 Total
% 0.61/0.79 ; 0.301 Real time
% 0.61/0.79 ;
% 0.61/0.79 ; Term-hash-array has 2,561 terms in all.
% 0.61/0.79 ; Feature-vector-row-index has 13 entries (13 at peak, 13 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.61/0.79 ; Feature-vector-row-index has 49 nodes (49 at peak, 49 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.61/0.79 ; Retrieved 3 possibly forward subsuming rows in 13 calls.
% 0.61/0.79 ; Retrieved 0 possibly backward subsumed rows in 13 calls.
% 0.61/0.79 ; Path-index has 2,566 entries (2,566 at peak, 2,566 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.61/0.79 ; Path-index has 953 nodes (953 at peak, 953 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.61/0.79 ; Trie-index has 2,566 entries (2,566 at peak, 2,566 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.61/0.79 ; Trie-index has 14,769 nodes (14,769 at peak, 14,769 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.61/0.79 ; Retrieved 8,424 generalization terms in 2,771 calls.
% 0.61/0.79 ; Retrieved 1,212 instance terms in 1,212 calls.
% 0.61/0.79 ; Retrieved 200,053 unifiable terms in 5,853 calls.
% 0.61/0.79 ;
% 0.61/0.79 ; The agenda of rows to process has 205 entries:
% 0.61/0.79 ; 3 with value 22 16 with value 29 64 with value 32
% 0.61/0.79 ; 10 with value 23 80 with value 31 16 with value 33
% 0.61/0.79 ; 16 with value 26
% 0.61/0.79 ; The agenda of rows to give has 1178 entries:
% 0.61/0.79 ; 2 with value (4 17) 133 with value (4 22) 320 with value (4 27)
% 0.61/0.79 ; 1 with value (4 18) 64 with value (4 23) 128 with value (4 28)
% 0.61/0.79 ; 20 with value (4 19) 80 with value (4 24) 8 with value (4 29)
% 0.61/0.79 ; 25 with value (4 20) 64 with value (4 25) 40 with value (4 31)
% 0.61/0.79 ; 51 with value (4 21) 208 with value (4 26) 34 with value (4 32)
% 0.61/0.79 Evaluation took:
% 0.61/0.79 0.301 seconds of real time
% 0.61/0.79 0.28051 seconds of user run time
% 0.61/0.79 0.020083 seconds of system run time
% 0.61/0.79 [Run times include 0.015 seconds GC run time.]
% 0.61/0.79 0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.61/0.79 0 page faults and
% 0.61/0.79 19,252,520 bytes consed.
% 0.61/0.79 :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.61/0.79 ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-11T21:15:28
% 0.61/0.79 :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.61/0.79 *
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------