TSTP Solution File: SYN567-1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : SYN567-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 12:14:11 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 11.42s 11.65s
% Output : Refutation 11.42s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12 % Problem : SYN567-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.11/0.13 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 13:39:25 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.35 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.13/0.35 The process was started by sandbox2 on n022.cluster.edu,
% 0.13/0.35 Mon Jul 11 13:39:25 2022
% 0.13/0.35 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 8257.
% 0.13/0.35
% 0.13/0.35 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.13/0.35 set(auto).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.13/0.35 clear(print_given).
% 0.13/0.35
% 0.13/0.35 list(usable).
% 0.13/0.35
% 0.13/0.35 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=5.
% 0.13/0.35
% 0.13/0.35 This is a non-Horn set without equality. The strategy
% 0.13/0.35 will be ordered hyper_res, ur_res, unit deletion, and
% 0.13/0.35 factoring, with satellites in sos and nuclei in usable.
% 0.13/0.35
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.13/0.35
% 0.13/0.35 ------------> process usable:
% 0.13/0.35
% 0.13/0.35 ------------> process sos:
% 0.13/0.35 19 back subsumes 17.
% 0.13/0.35 20 back subsumes 18.
% 0.13/0.35
% 0.13/0.35 ======= end of input processing =======
% 11.42/11.65
% 11.42/11.65 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 11.42/11.65
% 11.42/11.65 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 11.42/11.65
% 11.42/11.65 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 11.42/11.65
% 11.42/11.65 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 11.42/11.65
% 11.42/11.65 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 11.42/11.65
% 11.42/11.65
% 11.42/11.65 Failed to model usable list: disabling FINDER
% 11.42/11.65
% 11.42/11.65
% 11.42/11.65
% 11.42/11.65 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 11.42/11.65
% 11.42/11.65 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 11.42/11.65 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 11.42/11.65 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 11.42/11.65 number of clauses in intial UL: 16
% 11.42/11.65 number of clauses initially in problem: 19
% 11.42/11.65 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 84
% 11.42/11.65 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 11.42/11.65 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 11.42/11.65 absolute distinct symbol count: 9
% 11.42/11.65 distinct predicate count: 2
% 11.42/11.65 distinct function count: 5
% 11.42/11.65 distinct constant count: 2
% 11.42/11.65
% 11.42/11.65 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 11.42/11.65
% 11.42/11.65
% 11.42/11.65
% 11.42/11.65 =========== start of search ===========
% 11.42/11.65
% 11.42/11.65 -- HEY sandbox2, WE HAVE A PROOF!! --
% 11.42/11.65
% 11.42/11.65 -----> EMPTY CLAUSE at 11.26 sec ----> 119 [hyper,31,1,unit_del,2,3,9] {-} $F.
% 11.42/11.65
% 11.42/11.65 Length of proof is 2. Level of proof is 2.
% 11.42/11.65
% 11.42/11.65 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 11.42/11.65 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 11.42/11.65 % SZS output start Refutation
% 11.42/11.65
% 11.42/11.65 1 [] {+} -p2(f6(c9),f3(f4(c10))).
% 11.42/11.65 2 [] {+} -p2(f6(c9),f3(f7(f4(c10)))).
% 11.42/11.65 3 [] {+} -p2(f6(c9),f3(f7(f7(f4(c10))))).
% 11.42/11.65 7 [] {+} p2(f6(A),f6(B))| -p5(A,B).
% 11.42/11.65 9 [] {+} -p2(f6(c9),f3(f7(f7(f7(f4(c10)))))).
% 11.42/11.65 16 [] {+} p2(A,f3(f4(c10)))|p2(A,f3(f7(f4(c10))))|p2(A,f3(f7(f7(f4(c10)))))|p2(A,f3(f7(f7(f7(f4(c10))))))| -p2(f6(f8(A)),A).
% 11.42/11.65 21 [] {-} p5(f8(f6(A)),A).
% 11.42/11.65 27 [hyper,21,7] {-} p2(f6(f8(f6(A))),f6(A)).
% 11.42/11.65 31 [hyper,27,16] {-} p2(f6(A),f3(f4(c10)))|p2(f6(A),f3(f7(f4(c10))))|p2(f6(A),f3(f7(f7(f4(c10)))))|p2(f6(A),f3(f7(f7(f7(f4(c10)))))).
% 11.42/11.65 119 [hyper,31,1,unit_del,2,3,9] {-} $F.
% 11.42/11.65
% 11.42/11.65 % SZS output end Refutation
% 11.42/11.65 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 11.42/11.65
% 11.42/11.65
% 11.42/11.65 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 11.42/11.65
% 11.42/11.65
% 11.42/11.65 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 11.42/11.65
% 11.42/11.65 ============ end of search ============
% 11.42/11.65
% 11.42/11.65 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 11.42/11.65
% 11.42/11.65 Process 8257 finished Mon Jul 11 13:39:36 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------