TSTP Solution File: SYN567-1 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : SYN567-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 20:17:49 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.49s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 16 ( 11 unt; 3 nHn; 13 RR)
% Number of literals : 29 ( 0 equ; 12 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 5 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 2 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 9 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(p2_19,negated_conjecture,
( p2(X1,f3(f4(c10)))
| p2(X1,f3(f7(f4(c10))))
| p2(X1,f3(f7(f7(f4(c10)))))
| p2(X1,f3(f7(f7(f7(f4(c10))))))
| ~ p2(f6(f8(X1)),X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.3QtjRONJ0A/E---3.1_28899.p',p2_19) ).
cnf(p2_10,negated_conjecture,
( p2(f6(X1),f6(X2))
| ~ p5(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.3QtjRONJ0A/E---3.1_28899.p',p2_10) ).
cnf(p5_3,negated_conjecture,
p5(f8(f6(X1)),X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.3QtjRONJ0A/E---3.1_28899.p',p5_3) ).
cnf(not_p2_12,negated_conjecture,
~ p2(f6(c9),f3(f7(f7(f7(f4(c10)))))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.3QtjRONJ0A/E---3.1_28899.p',not_p2_12) ).
cnf(not_p2_6,negated_conjecture,
~ p2(f6(c9),f3(f7(f7(f4(c10))))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.3QtjRONJ0A/E---3.1_28899.p',not_p2_6) ).
cnf(not_p2_5,negated_conjecture,
~ p2(f6(c9),f3(f7(f4(c10)))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.3QtjRONJ0A/E---3.1_28899.p',not_p2_5) ).
cnf(not_p2_4,negated_conjecture,
~ p2(f6(c9),f3(f4(c10))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.3QtjRONJ0A/E---3.1_28899.p',not_p2_4) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
( p2(X1,f3(f4(c10)))
| p2(X1,f3(f7(f4(c10))))
| p2(X1,f3(f7(f7(f4(c10)))))
| p2(X1,f3(f7(f7(f7(f4(c10))))))
| ~ p2(f6(f8(X1)),X1) ),
p2_19 ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
( p2(f6(X1),f6(X2))
| ~ p5(X1,X2) ),
p2_10 ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
p5(f8(f6(X1)),X1),
p5_3 ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
~ p2(f6(c9),f3(f7(f7(f7(f4(c10)))))),
not_p2_12 ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
( p2(f6(X1),f3(f7(f7(f7(f4(c10))))))
| p2(f6(X1),f3(f7(f7(f4(c10)))))
| p2(f6(X1),f3(f7(f4(c10))))
| p2(f6(X1),f3(f4(c10))) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),c_0_9])]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
~ p2(f6(c9),f3(f7(f7(f4(c10))))),
not_p2_6 ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
~ p2(f6(c9),f3(f7(f4(c10)))),
not_p2_5 ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
~ p2(f6(c9),f3(f4(c10))),
not_p2_4 ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12]),c_0_13]),c_0_14]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.12 % Problem : SYN567-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.08/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 18:01:29 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.46 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.19/0.46 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.3QtjRONJ0A/E---3.1_28899.p
% 0.19/0.49 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.19/0.49 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # sh5l with pid 28980 completed with status 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Result found by sh5l
% 0.19/0.49 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.19/0.49 # Search class: FGUNS-FFSF11-MFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.49 # partial match(1): FGUNS-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.49 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 181s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 28987 completed with status 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.19/0.49 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.19/0.49 # Search class: FGUNS-FFSF11-MFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.49 # partial match(1): FGUNS-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.49 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 181s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.19/0.49 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.19/0.49
% 0.19/0.49 # Proof found!
% 0.19/0.49 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.19/0.49 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.49 # Parsed axioms : 19
% 0.19/0.49 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Initial clauses : 19
% 0.19/0.49 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Initial clauses in saturation : 19
% 0.19/0.49 # Processed clauses : 193
% 0.19/0.49 # ...of these trivial : 9
% 0.19/0.49 # ...subsumed : 57
% 0.19/0.49 # ...remaining for further processing : 127
% 0.19/0.49 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Backward-subsumed : 4
% 0.19/0.49 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Generated clauses : 777
% 0.19/0.49 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 603
% 0.19/0.49 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Paramodulations : 777
% 0.19/0.49 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # NegExts : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Total rewrite steps : 174
% 0.19/0.49 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.49 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.49 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.49 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.49 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.49 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.49 # Current number of processed clauses : 104
% 0.19/0.49 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 30
% 0.19/0.49 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Negative unit clauses : 4
% 0.19/0.49 # Non-unit-clauses : 70
% 0.19/0.49 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 440
% 0.19/0.49 # ...number of literals in the above : 1091
% 0.19/0.49 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Current number of archived clauses : 23
% 0.19/0.49 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1148
% 0.19/0.49 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1052
% 0.19/0.49 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 57
% 0.19/0.49 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 15
% 0.19/0.49 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # BW rewrite match attempts : 85
% 0.19/0.49 # BW rewrite match successes : 4
% 0.19/0.49 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Termbank termtop insertions : 14329
% 0.19/0.49
% 0.19/0.49 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.49 # User time : 0.016 s
% 0.19/0.49 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.19/0.49 # Total time : 0.018 s
% 0.19/0.49 # Maximum resident set size: 1616 pages
% 0.19/0.49
% 0.19/0.49 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.49 # User time : 0.017 s
% 0.19/0.49 # System time : 0.005 s
% 0.19/0.49 # Total time : 0.022 s
% 0.19/0.49 # Maximum resident set size: 1688 pages
% 0.19/0.49 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.19/0.49 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------