TSTP Solution File: SYN564-1 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : SYN564-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 12:14:10 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.48s 0.66s
% Output   : Refutation 0.48s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : SYN564-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 20:52:19 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.35  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.12/0.35  The process was started by sandbox2 on n027.cluster.edu,
% 0.12/0.35  Mon Jul 11 20:52:19 2022
% 0.12/0.35  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 22692.
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.12/0.35  set(auto).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.12/0.35  clear(print_given).
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  list(usable).
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=4.
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  This is a Horn set without equality.  The strategy will
% 0.12/0.35  be hyperresolution, with satellites in sos and nuclei
% 0.12/0.35  in usable.
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(order_hyper).
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  ------------> process usable:
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  ------------> process sos:
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.45/0.64  
% 0.45/0.64  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.45/0.64  
% 0.45/0.64  
% 0.45/0.64  Failed to model usable list: disabling FINDER
% 0.45/0.64  
% 0.45/0.64  
% 0.45/0.64  
% 0.45/0.64  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.45/0.64  
% 0.45/0.64  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.45/0.64  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.45/0.64  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.45/0.64  number of clauses in intial UL: 12
% 0.45/0.64  number of clauses initially in problem: 18
% 0.45/0.64  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 66
% 0.45/0.64  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.45/0.64  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.45/0.64  absolute distinct symbol count: 11
% 0.45/0.64     distinct predicate count: 3
% 0.45/0.64     distinct function count: 6
% 0.45/0.64     distinct constant count: 2
% 0.45/0.64  
% 0.45/0.64  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.45/0.64  
% 0.45/0.64  
% 0.45/0.64  
% 0.45/0.64  =========== start of search ===========
% 0.48/0.66  
% 0.48/0.66  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 0.48/0.66  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.48/0.66  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.48/0.66  
% 0.48/0.66  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   0.29 sec ----> 2187 [binary,2186.1,5.1] {-} $F.
% 0.48/0.66  
% 0.48/0.66  Length of proof is 5.  Level of proof is 3.
% 0.48/0.66  
% 0.48/0.66  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.48/0.66  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.48/0.66  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.48/0.66  
% 0.48/0.66  1 [] {+} p2(f5(A),f5(B))| -p4(A,B).
% 0.48/0.66  4 [] {+} p4(A,B)| -p4(C,A)| -p4(C,B).
% 0.48/0.66  5 [] {+} -p10(f9(f5(c11),f5(c12)),f5(f8(c11,c12))).
% 0.48/0.66  7 [] {+} p10(f9(A,B),C)| -p10(A,f3(C,B)).
% 0.48/0.66  8 [] {+} p10(A,B)| -p2(C,A)| -p2(D,B)| -p10(C,D).
% 0.48/0.66  11 [] {+} p2(f9(A,B),f9(C,D))| -p2(A,C)| -p2(B,D).
% 0.48/0.66  13 [] {-} p2(A,A).
% 0.48/0.66  14 [] {-} p4(A,A).
% 0.48/0.66  15 [] {-} p2(f5(f7(A)),f5(A)).
% 0.48/0.66  16 [] {-} p4(f8(A,B),f6(A,f7(B))).
% 0.48/0.66  18 [] {-} p10(f5(A),f3(f5(f6(A,B)),f5(B))).
% 0.48/0.66  20 [hyper,15,11,13] {-} p2(f9(A,f5(f7(B))),f9(A,f5(B))).
% 0.48/0.66  60 [hyper,16,4,14] {-} p4(f6(A,f7(B)),f8(A,B)).
% 0.48/0.66  154 [hyper,18,7] {-} p10(f9(f5(A),f5(B)),f5(f6(A,B))).
% 0.48/0.66  170 [hyper,60,1] {-} p2(f5(f6(A,f7(B))),f5(f8(A,B))).
% 0.48/0.66  2186 [hyper,170,8,20,154] {-} p10(f9(f5(A),f5(B)),f5(f8(A,B))).
% 0.48/0.66  2187 [binary,2186.1,5.1] {-} $F.
% 0.48/0.66  
% 0.48/0.66  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.48/0.66  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.48/0.66  
% 0.48/0.66  
% 0.48/0.66  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.48/0.66  
% 0.48/0.66  
% 0.48/0.66  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.48/0.66  
% 0.48/0.66  ============ end of search ============
% 0.48/0.66  
% 0.48/0.66  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 0.48/0.66  
% 0.48/0.66  Process 22692 finished Mon Jul 11 20:52:19 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------