TSTP Solution File: SYN564-1 by CSE---1.6

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.6
% Problem  : SYN564-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d

% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep  1 01:46:25 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 120.89s 121.01s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 120.98s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.10  % Problem    : SYN564-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.00/0.10  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.11/0.29  % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.29  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.29  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.29  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.29  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.29  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.11/0.29  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.11/0.29  % DateTime   : Sat Aug 26 18:59:29 EDT 2023
% 0.11/0.29  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.14/0.46  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 120.89/121.00  %-------------------------------------------
% 120.89/121.00  % File        :CSE---1.6
% 120.89/121.00  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 120.89/121.00  % Transform   :cnf
% 120.89/121.00  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 120.89/121.00  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 120.89/121.00  
% 120.89/121.00  % Result      :Theorem 120.470000s
% 120.89/121.00  % Output      :CNFRefutation 120.470000s
% 120.89/121.00  %-------------------------------------------
% 120.89/121.00  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 120.89/121.00  % File     : SYN564-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% 120.89/121.00  % Domain   : Syntactic
% 120.89/121.00  % Problem  : Harrison problem 2888
% 120.89/121.00  % Version  : Especial.
% 120.89/121.00  % English  :
% 120.89/121.00  
% 120.89/121.00  % Refs     : [Har01] Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 120.89/121.00  % Source   : [Har01]
% 120.89/121.00  % Names    :
% 120.89/121.00  
% 120.89/121.00  % Status   : Unsatisfiable
% 120.89/121.00  % Rating   : 0.00 v7.4.0, 0.17 v7.3.0, 0.00 v5.4.0, 0.11 v5.3.0, 0.25 v5.2.0, 0.00 v2.5.0
% 120.89/121.00  % Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   18 (   7 unt;   0 nHn;  12 RR)
% 120.89/121.00  %            Number of literals    :   37 (   0 equ;  20 neg)
% 120.89/121.00  %            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   2 avg)
% 120.89/121.00  %            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
% 120.89/121.01  %            Number of predicates  :    3 (   3 usr;   0 prp; 2-2 aty)
% 120.89/121.01  %            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
% 120.89/121.01  %            Number of variables   :   45 (   0 sgn)
% 120.89/121.01  % SPC      : CNF_UNS_RFO_NEQ_HRN
% 120.89/121.01  
% 120.89/121.01  % Comments :
% 120.89/121.01  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 120.89/121.01  cnf(p2_1,negated_conjecture,
% 120.89/121.01      p2(X9,X9) ).
% 120.89/121.01  
% 120.89/121.01  cnf(p4_2,negated_conjecture,
% 120.89/121.01      p4(X23,X23) ).
% 120.89/121.01  
% 120.89/121.01  cnf(p2_3,negated_conjecture,
% 120.89/121.01      p2(f5(f7(X18)),f5(X18)) ).
% 120.89/121.01  
% 120.89/121.01  cnf(p4_4,negated_conjecture,
% 120.89/121.01      p4(f8(X38,X39),f6(X38,f7(X39))) ).
% 120.89/121.01  
% 120.89/121.01  cnf(p4_5,negated_conjecture,
% 120.89/121.01      p4(f7(f8(X32,X33)),f8(X33,X32)) ).
% 120.89/121.01  
% 120.89/121.01  cnf(p2_6,negated_conjecture,
% 120.89/121.01      ( p2(f5(X16),f5(X17))
% 120.89/121.01      | ~ p4(X16,X17) ) ).
% 120.89/121.01  
% 120.89/121.01  cnf(p4_7,negated_conjecture,
% 120.89/121.01      ( p4(f7(X30),f7(X31))
% 120.89/121.01      | ~ p4(X30,X31) ) ).
% 120.89/121.01  
% 120.89/121.01  cnf(p2_8,negated_conjecture,
% 120.89/121.01      ( p2(X10,X11)
% 120.89/121.01      | ~ p2(X9,X10)
% 120.89/121.01      | ~ p2(X9,X11) ) ).
% 120.89/121.01  
% 120.89/121.01  cnf(p4_9,negated_conjecture,
% 120.89/121.01      ( p4(X24,X25)
% 120.89/121.01      | ~ p4(X23,X24)
% 120.89/121.01      | ~ p4(X23,X25) ) ).
% 120.89/121.01  
% 120.89/121.01  cnf(p10_10,negated_conjecture,
% 120.89/121.01      p10(f5(X7),f3(f5(f6(X7,X8)),f5(X8))) ).
% 120.89/121.01  
% 120.89/121.01  cnf(not_p10_11,negated_conjecture,
% 120.89/121.01      ~ p10(f9(f5(c11),f5(c12)),f5(f8(c11,c12))) ).
% 120.89/121.01  
% 120.89/121.01  cnf(p10_12,negated_conjecture,
% 120.89/121.01      ( p10(X4,f3(X5,X6))
% 120.89/121.01      | ~ p10(f9(X4,X6),X5) ) ).
% 120.89/121.01  
% 120.89/121.01  cnf(p10_13,negated_conjecture,
% 120.89/121.01      ( p10(f9(X4,X6),X5)
% 120.89/121.01      | ~ p10(X4,f3(X5,X6)) ) ).
% 120.89/121.01  
% 120.89/121.01  cnf(p10_14,negated_conjecture,
% 120.89/121.01      ( p10(X0,X1)
% 120.89/121.01      | ~ p2(X2,X0)
% 120.89/121.01      | ~ p2(X3,X1)
% 120.89/121.01      | ~ p10(X2,X3) ) ).
% 120.89/121.01  
% 120.89/121.01  cnf(p4_15,negated_conjecture,
% 120.89/121.01      ( p4(f8(X34,X35),f8(X36,X37))
% 120.89/121.01      | ~ p4(X34,X36)
% 120.89/121.01      | ~ p4(X35,X37) ) ).
% 120.89/121.01  
% 120.89/121.01  cnf(p2_16,negated_conjecture,
% 120.89/121.01      ( p2(f3(X12,X13),f3(X14,X15))
% 120.89/121.01      | ~ p2(X12,X14)
% 120.89/121.01      | ~ p2(X13,X15) ) ).
% 120.89/121.01  
% 120.89/121.01  cnf(p2_17,negated_conjecture,
% 120.89/121.01      ( p2(f9(X19,X20),f9(X21,X22))
% 120.89/121.01      | ~ p2(X19,X21)
% 120.89/121.01      | ~ p2(X20,X22) ) ).
% 120.89/121.01  
% 120.89/121.01  cnf(p4_18,negated_conjecture,
% 120.89/121.01      ( p4(f6(X26,X27),f6(X28,X29))
% 120.89/121.01      | ~ p4(X26,X28)
% 120.89/121.01      | ~ p4(X27,X29) ) ).
% 120.89/121.01  
% 120.89/121.01  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 120.89/121.01  %-------------------------------------------
% 120.89/121.01  % Proof found
% 120.89/121.01  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 120.89/121.01  % SZS output start Proof
% 120.89/121.01  %ClaNum:18(EqnAxiom:0)
% 120.89/121.01  %VarNum:90(SingletonVarNum:45)
% 120.89/121.01  %MaxLitNum:4
% 120.89/121.01  %MaxfuncDepth:2
% 120.89/121.01  %SharedTerms:8
% 120.89/121.01  %goalClause: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
% 120.89/121.01  %singleGoalClaCount:7
% 120.89/121.01  [7]~P2(f8(f2(a4),f2(a5)),f2(f7(a4,a5)))
% 120.89/121.01  [1]P1(x11,x11)
% 120.89/121.01  [2]P3(x21,x21)
% 120.89/121.01  [3]P1(f2(f1(x31)),f2(x31))
% 120.89/121.01  [4]P3(f7(x41,x42),f6(x41,f1(x42)))
% 120.89/121.01  [5]P3(f1(f7(x51,x52)),f7(x52,x51))
% 120.89/121.01  [6]P2(f2(x61),f3(f2(f6(x61,x62)),f2(x62)))
% 120.89/121.01  [8]~P3(x81,x82)+P1(f2(x81),f2(x82))
% 120.89/121.01  [9]~P3(x91,x92)+P3(f1(x91),f1(x92))
% 120.89/121.01  [13]~P2(f8(x131,x133),x132)+P2(x131,f3(x132,x133))
% 120.89/121.01  [14]~P2(x141,f3(x143,x142))+P2(f8(x141,x142),x143)
% 120.89/121.01  [10]~P1(x103,x101)+P1(x101,x102)+~P1(x103,x102)
% 120.89/121.01  [11]~P3(x113,x111)+P3(x111,x112)+~P3(x113,x112)
% 120.89/121.01  [15]~P1(x152,x154)+~P1(x151,x153)+P1(f3(x151,x152),f3(x153,x154))
% 120.89/121.01  [16]~P1(x162,x164)+~P1(x161,x163)+P1(f8(x161,x162),f8(x163,x164))
% 120.89/121.01  [17]~P3(x172,x174)+~P3(x171,x173)+P3(f7(x171,x172),f7(x173,x174))
% 120.89/121.01  [18]~P3(x182,x184)+~P3(x181,x183)+P3(f6(x181,x182),f6(x183,x184))
% 120.89/121.01  [12]~P2(x124,x123)+P2(x121,x122)+~P1(x123,x122)+~P1(x124,x121)
% 120.89/121.01  %EqnAxiom
% 120.89/121.01  
% 120.89/121.01  %-------------------------------------------
% 120.98/121.02  cnf(19,plain,
% 120.98/121.02     (~P2(f2(a4),f3(f2(f7(a4,a5)),f2(a5)))),
% 120.98/121.02     inference(scs_inference,[],[7,14])).
% 120.98/121.02  cnf(25,plain,
% 120.98/121.02     (P1(f2(x251),f2(f1(x251)))),
% 120.98/121.02     inference(scs_inference,[],[3,1,10])).
% 120.98/121.02  cnf(26,plain,
% 120.98/121.02     (P1(x261,x261)),
% 120.98/121.02     inference(rename_variables,[],[1])).
% 120.98/121.02  cnf(28,plain,
% 120.98/121.02     (~P2(f2(f1(a4)),f3(f2(f7(a4,a5)),f2(a5)))),
% 120.98/121.02     inference(scs_inference,[],[19,3,1,26,10,12])).
% 120.98/121.02  cnf(37,plain,
% 120.98/121.02     (P3(f6(x371,f1(x372)),f7(x371,x372))),
% 120.98/121.02     inference(scs_inference,[],[4,2,11])).
% 120.98/121.02  cnf(88,plain,
% 120.98/121.02     (P3(f7(x881,x882),f1(f7(x882,x881)))),
% 120.98/121.02     inference(scs_inference,[],[5,2,11])).
% 120.98/121.02  cnf(111,plain,
% 120.98/121.02     (P2(f2(f1(x1111)),f3(f2(f6(x1111,x1112)),f2(x1112)))),
% 120.98/121.02     inference(scs_inference,[],[25,6,1,12])).
% 120.98/121.02  cnf(116,plain,
% 120.98/121.02     (P2(f8(f2(f1(x1161)),f2(x1162)),f2(f6(x1161,x1162)))),
% 120.98/121.02     inference(scs_inference,[],[111,14])).
% 120.98/121.02  cnf(144,plain,
% 120.98/121.02     (~P2(f8(f2(f1(a4)),f2(a5)),f2(f1(f7(a4,a5))))),
% 120.98/121.02     inference(scs_inference,[],[28,1,3,13,12])).
% 120.98/121.02  cnf(163,plain,
% 120.98/121.02     (~P1(f2(f6(x1631,x1632)),f2(f7(a4,a5)))+~P1(f8(f2(f1(x1631)),f2(x1632)),f8(f2(a4),f2(a5)))),
% 120.98/121.02     inference(scs_inference,[],[7,116,12])).
% 120.98/121.02  cnf(167,plain,
% 120.98/121.02     (~P1(f8(f2(f1(a4)),f2(f1(a5))),f8(f2(a4),f2(a5)))),
% 120.98/121.02     inference(scs_inference,[],[37,163,8])).
% 120.98/121.02  cnf(497,plain,
% 120.98/121.02     (P3(f7(f1(f7(x4971,x4972)),f7(x4972,x4971)),f7(f1(f7(x4971,x4972)),f1(f7(x4971,x4972))))),
% 120.98/121.02     inference(scs_inference,[],[88,17,11])).
% 120.98/121.02  cnf(1509,plain,
% 120.98/121.02     (~P1(f2(f1(a4)),f2(a4))),
% 120.98/121.02     inference(scs_inference,[],[144,497,167,3,8,14,16])).
% 120.98/121.02  cnf(1518,plain,
% 120.98/121.02     ($false),
% 120.98/121.02     inference(scs_inference,[],[1509,3]),
% 120.98/121.02     ['proof']).
% 120.98/121.02  % SZS output end Proof
% 120.98/121.02  % Total time :120.470000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------