TSTP Solution File: SYN561-1 by iProver---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9
% Problem  : SYN561-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover %s %d THM

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May  3 03:31:34 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 2.52s 1.18s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 2.52s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named definition)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_49,negated_conjecture,
    p2(X0,X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p2_1) ).

cnf(c_50,negated_conjecture,
    p9(c14,c10),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p9_2) ).

cnf(c_51,negated_conjecture,
    p8(c11,c14),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p8_3) ).

cnf(c_52,negated_conjecture,
    p2(f7(c10,c14),c15),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p2_4) ).

cnf(c_53,negated_conjecture,
    p2(f6(c15,c11),c16),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p2_5) ).

cnf(c_54,negated_conjecture,
    p2(f3(f4(f5(c12)),c13),c16),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p2_6) ).

cnf(c_57,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p2(X0,X1)
    | ~ p2(X0,X2)
    | p2(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p2_9) ).

cnf(c_63,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p2(f6(X0,c11),f3(f4(f5(c12)),c13))
    | ~ p2(f7(c10,X1),X0)
    | ~ p9(X1,c10)
    | ~ p8(c11,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',not_p9_15) ).

cnf(c_139,plain,
    f5(c12) = sP0_iProver_def,
    definition ).

cnf(c_140,plain,
    f4(sP0_iProver_def) = sP1_iProver_def,
    definition ).

cnf(c_141,plain,
    f3(sP1_iProver_def,c13) = sP2_iProver_def,
    definition ).

cnf(c_142,plain,
    f6(c15,c11) = sP3_iProver_def,
    definition ).

cnf(c_143,plain,
    f7(c10,c14) = sP4_iProver_def,
    definition ).

cnf(c_144,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p2(f7(c10,X0),X1)
    | ~ p2(f6(X1,c11),sP2_iProver_def)
    | ~ p9(X0,c10)
    | ~ p8(c11,X0) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_63,c_139,c_140,c_141]) ).

cnf(c_150,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p2(X0,X1)
    | ~ p2(X0,X2)
    | p2(X1,X2) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_57]) ).

cnf(c_153,negated_conjecture,
    p2(sP2_iProver_def,c16),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_54]) ).

cnf(c_154,negated_conjecture,
    p2(sP3_iProver_def,c16),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_53,c_142]) ).

cnf(c_155,negated_conjecture,
    p2(sP4_iProver_def,c15),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_52,c_143]) ).

cnf(c_156,negated_conjecture,
    p8(c11,c14),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_51]) ).

cnf(c_157,negated_conjecture,
    p9(c14,c10),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_50]) ).

cnf(c_158,negated_conjecture,
    p2(X0,X0),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_49]) ).

cnf(c_487,plain,
    ( ~ p2(f6(X0,c11),sP2_iProver_def)
    | ~ p2(sP4_iProver_def,X0)
    | ~ p9(c14,c10)
    | ~ p8(c11,c14) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_143,c_144]) ).

cnf(c_488,plain,
    ( ~ p2(f6(X0,c11),sP2_iProver_def)
    | ~ p2(sP4_iProver_def,X0) ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_487,c_156,c_157]) ).

cnf(c_516,plain,
    ( ~ p2(sP2_iProver_def,X0)
    | p2(c16,X0) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_153,c_150]) ).

cnf(c_517,plain,
    ( ~ p2(sP3_iProver_def,X0)
    | p2(c16,X0) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_154,c_150]) ).

cnf(c_797,plain,
    p2(c16,sP2_iProver_def),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_158,c_516]) ).

cnf(c_830,plain,
    p2(c16,sP3_iProver_def),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_158,c_517]) ).

cnf(c_834,plain,
    ( ~ p2(c16,X0)
    | p2(sP3_iProver_def,X0) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_830,c_150]) ).

cnf(c_930,plain,
    p2(sP3_iProver_def,sP2_iProver_def),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_797,c_834]) ).

cnf(c_976,plain,
    ( ~ p2(sP3_iProver_def,sP2_iProver_def)
    | ~ p2(sP4_iProver_def,c15) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_142,c_488]) ).

cnf(c_977,plain,
    ~ p2(sP3_iProver_def,sP2_iProver_def),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_976,c_155]) ).

cnf(c_978,plain,
    $false,
    inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_977,c_930]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem  : SYN561-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Thu May  2 20:35:25 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.48  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.20/0.48  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --heuristic_context casc_unsat --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 2.52/1.18  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 2.52/1.18  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 2.52/1.18  
% 2.52/1.18  %---------------- iProver v3.9 (pre CASC 2024/SMT-COMP 2024) ----------------%
% 2.52/1.18  
% 2.52/1.18  ------  iProver source info
% 2.52/1.18  
% 2.52/1.18  git: date: 2024-05-02 19:28:25 +0000
% 2.52/1.18  git: sha1: a33b5eb135c74074ba803943bb12f2ebd971352f
% 2.52/1.18  git: non_committed_changes: false
% 2.52/1.18  
% 2.52/1.18  ------ Parsing...successful
% 2.52/1.18  
% 2.52/1.18  
% 2.52/1.18  
% 2.52/1.18  ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e 
% 2.52/1.18  
% 2.52/1.18  ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e 
% 2.52/1.18  
% 2.52/1.18  ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 2.52/1.18  ------ Proving...
% 2.52/1.18  ------ Problem Properties 
% 2.52/1.18  
% 2.52/1.18  
% 2.52/1.18  clauses                                 20
% 2.52/1.18  conjectures                             15
% 2.52/1.18  EPR                                     9
% 2.52/1.18  Horn                                    20
% 2.52/1.18  unary                                   11
% 2.52/1.18  binary                                  2
% 2.52/1.18  lits                                    39
% 2.52/1.18  lits eq                                 5
% 2.52/1.18  fd_pure                                 0
% 2.52/1.18  fd_pseudo                               0
% 2.52/1.18  fd_cond                                 0
% 2.52/1.18  fd_pseudo_cond                          0
% 2.52/1.18  AC symbols                              0
% 2.52/1.18  
% 2.52/1.18  ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 2.52/1.18  
% 2.52/1.18  ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 2.52/1.18  
% 2.52/1.18  
% 2.52/1.18  ------ 
% 2.52/1.18  Current options:
% 2.52/1.18  ------ 
% 2.52/1.18  
% 2.52/1.18  
% 2.52/1.18  
% 2.52/1.18  
% 2.52/1.18  ------ Proving...
% 2.52/1.18  
% 2.52/1.18  
% 2.52/1.18  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 2.52/1.18  
% 2.52/1.18  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.52/1.18  
% 2.52/1.18  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------