TSTP Solution File: SYN561-1 by iProver---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9
% Problem : SYN561-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 19:39:38 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 2.89s 1.16s
% Output : CNFRefutation 2.89s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named definition)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_49,negated_conjecture,
p2(X0,X0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p2_1) ).
cnf(c_50,negated_conjecture,
p9(c14,c10),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p9_2) ).
cnf(c_51,negated_conjecture,
p8(c11,c14),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p8_3) ).
cnf(c_52,negated_conjecture,
p2(f7(c10,c14),c15),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p2_4) ).
cnf(c_53,negated_conjecture,
p2(f6(c15,c11),c16),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p2_5) ).
cnf(c_54,negated_conjecture,
p2(f3(f4(f5(c12)),c13),c16),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p2_6) ).
cnf(c_57,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p2(X0,X1)
| ~ p2(X0,X2)
| p2(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p2_9) ).
cnf(c_63,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p2(f6(X0,c11),f3(f4(f5(c12)),c13))
| ~ p2(f7(c10,X1),X0)
| ~ p9(X1,c10)
| ~ p8(c11,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',not_p9_15) ).
cnf(c_139,plain,
f5(c12) = sP0_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_140,plain,
f4(sP0_iProver_def) = sP1_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_141,plain,
f3(sP1_iProver_def,c13) = sP2_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_142,plain,
f6(c15,c11) = sP3_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_143,plain,
f7(c10,c14) = sP4_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_144,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p2(f7(c10,X0),X1)
| ~ p2(f6(X1,c11),sP2_iProver_def)
| ~ p9(X0,c10)
| ~ p8(c11,X0) ),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_63,c_139,c_140,c_141]) ).
cnf(c_150,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p2(X0,X1)
| ~ p2(X0,X2)
| p2(X1,X2) ),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_57]) ).
cnf(c_153,negated_conjecture,
p2(sP2_iProver_def,c16),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_54]) ).
cnf(c_154,negated_conjecture,
p2(sP3_iProver_def,c16),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_53,c_142]) ).
cnf(c_155,negated_conjecture,
p2(sP4_iProver_def,c15),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_52,c_143]) ).
cnf(c_156,negated_conjecture,
p8(c11,c14),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_51]) ).
cnf(c_157,negated_conjecture,
p9(c14,c10),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_50]) ).
cnf(c_158,negated_conjecture,
p2(X0,X0),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_49]) ).
cnf(c_487,plain,
( ~ p2(f6(X0,c11),sP2_iProver_def)
| ~ p2(sP4_iProver_def,X0)
| ~ p9(c14,c10)
| ~ p8(c11,c14) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_143,c_144]) ).
cnf(c_488,plain,
( ~ p2(f6(X0,c11),sP2_iProver_def)
| ~ p2(sP4_iProver_def,X0) ),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_487,c_156,c_157]) ).
cnf(c_516,plain,
( ~ p2(sP2_iProver_def,X0)
| p2(c16,X0) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_153,c_150]) ).
cnf(c_517,plain,
( ~ p2(sP3_iProver_def,X0)
| p2(c16,X0) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_154,c_150]) ).
cnf(c_797,plain,
p2(c16,sP2_iProver_def),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_158,c_516]) ).
cnf(c_830,plain,
p2(c16,sP3_iProver_def),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_158,c_517]) ).
cnf(c_834,plain,
( ~ p2(c16,X0)
| p2(sP3_iProver_def,X0) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_830,c_150]) ).
cnf(c_930,plain,
p2(sP3_iProver_def,sP2_iProver_def),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_797,c_834]) ).
cnf(c_976,plain,
( ~ p2(sP3_iProver_def,sP2_iProver_def)
| ~ p2(sP4_iProver_def,c15) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_142,c_488]) ).
cnf(c_977,plain,
~ p2(sP3_iProver_def,sP2_iProver_def),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_976,c_155]) ).
cnf(c_978,plain,
$false,
inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_977,c_930]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SYN561-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.07/0.12 % Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Sun Jun 23 18:42:39 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.48 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.20/0.48 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --heuristic_context casc_unsat --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 2.89/1.16 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 2.89/1.16 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 2.89/1.16
% 2.89/1.16 %---------------- iProver v3.9 (pre CASC 2024/SMT-COMP 2024) ----------------%
% 2.89/1.16
% 2.89/1.16 ------ iProver source info
% 2.89/1.16
% 2.89/1.16 git: date: 2024-06-12 09:56:46 +0000
% 2.89/1.16 git: sha1: 4869ab62f0a3398f9d3a35e6db7918ebd3847e49
% 2.89/1.16 git: non_committed_changes: false
% 2.89/1.16
% 2.89/1.16 ------ Parsing...successful
% 2.89/1.16
% 2.89/1.16
% 2.89/1.16
% 2.89/1.16 ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e
% 2.89/1.16
% 2.89/1.16 ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e
% 2.89/1.16
% 2.89/1.16 ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 2.89/1.16 ------ Proving...
% 2.89/1.16 ------ Problem Properties
% 2.89/1.16
% 2.89/1.16
% 2.89/1.16 clauses 20
% 2.89/1.16 conjectures 15
% 2.89/1.16 EPR 9
% 2.89/1.16 Horn 20
% 2.89/1.16 unary 11
% 2.89/1.16 binary 2
% 2.89/1.16 lits 39
% 2.89/1.16 lits eq 5
% 2.89/1.16 fd_pure 0
% 2.89/1.16 fd_pseudo 0
% 2.89/1.16 fd_cond 0
% 2.89/1.16 fd_pseudo_cond 0
% 2.89/1.16 AC symbols 0
% 2.89/1.16
% 2.89/1.16 ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on
% 2.89/1.16
% 2.89/1.16 ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 2.89/1.16
% 2.89/1.16
% 2.89/1.16 ------
% 2.89/1.16 Current options:
% 2.89/1.16 ------
% 2.89/1.16
% 2.89/1.16
% 2.89/1.16
% 2.89/1.16
% 2.89/1.16 ------ Proving...
% 2.89/1.16
% 2.89/1.16
% 2.89/1.16 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 2.89/1.16
% 2.89/1.16 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.89/1.16
% 2.89/1.16
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------