TSTP Solution File: SYN561-1 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : SYN561-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 11:11:18 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 6.82s 2.77s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 6.82s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :   23
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   45 (  16 unt;  15 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   55 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   55 (  30   ~;  25   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   14 (   8   >;   6   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   12 (  12 usr;   7 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   25 (;  25   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ p9 > p8 > p2 > f7 > f6 > f3 > #nlpp > f5 > f4 > c16 > c15 > c14 > c13 > c12 > c11 > c10

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(c12,type,
    c12: $i ).

tff(c16,type,
    c16: $i ).

tff(p2,type,
    p2: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(c14,type,
    c14: $i ).

tff(p8,type,
    p8: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(f7,type,
    f7: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(c10,type,
    c10: $i ).

tff(c15,type,
    c15: $i ).

tff(f5,type,
    f5: $i > $i ).

tff(c11,type,
    c11: $i ).

tff(f4,type,
    f4: $i > $i ).

tff(c13,type,
    c13: $i ).

tff(f3,type,
    f3: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(p9,type,
    p9: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(f6,type,
    f6: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(f_23,axiom,
    ! [X0] : p2(X0,X0),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_24,axiom,
    p9(c14,c10),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_25,axiom,
    p8(c11,c14),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_26,axiom,
    p2(f7(c10,c14),c15),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_46,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X0] :
      ( p2(X1,X2)
      | ~ p2(X0,X1)
      | ~ p2(X0,X2) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_28,axiom,
    p2(f3(f4(f5(c12)),c13),c16),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_27,axiom,
    p2(f6(c15,c11),c16),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_104,axiom,
    ! [X28,X27] :
      ( ~ p9(X28,c10)
      | ~ p8(c11,X28)
      | ~ p2(f7(c10,X28),X27)
      | ~ p2(f6(X27,c11),f3(f4(f5(c12)),c13)) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(c_2,plain,
    ! [X0_1] : p2(X0_1,X0_1),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_23]) ).

tff(c_4,plain,
    p9(c14,c10),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_24]) ).

tff(c_6,plain,
    p8(c11,c14),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_25]) ).

tff(c_8,plain,
    p2(f7(c10,c14),c15),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_26]) ).

tff(c_34,plain,
    ! [X0_36,X2_37,X1_38] :
      ( ~ p2(X0_36,X2_37)
      | ~ p2(X0_36,X1_38)
      | p2(X1_38,X2_37) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_46]) ).

tff(c_72,plain,
    ! [X0_43,X1_44] :
      ( ~ p2(X0_43,X1_44)
      | p2(X1_44,X0_43) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_2,c_34]) ).

tff(c_89,plain,
    p2(c15,f7(c10,c14)),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_8,c_72]) ).

tff(c_18,plain,
    ! [X0_8,X2_7,X1_6] :
      ( ~ p2(X0_8,X2_7)
      | ~ p2(X0_8,X1_6)
      | p2(X1_6,X2_7) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_46]) ).

tff(c_238,plain,
    ! [X1_60] :
      ( ~ p2(c15,X1_60)
      | p2(X1_60,f7(c10,c14)) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_89,c_18]) ).

tff(c_52,plain,
    ! [X0_1,X1_38] :
      ( ~ p2(X0_1,X1_38)
      | p2(X1_38,X0_1) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_2,c_34]) ).

tff(c_260,plain,
    ! [X1_60] :
      ( p2(f7(c10,c14),X1_60)
      | ~ p2(c15,X1_60) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_238,c_52]) ).

tff(c_12,plain,
    p2(f3(f4(f5(c12)),c13),c16),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_28]) ).

tff(c_87,plain,
    p2(c16,f3(f4(f5(c12)),c13)),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_12,c_72]) ).

tff(c_10,plain,
    p2(f6(c15,c11),c16),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_27]) ).

tff(c_88,plain,
    p2(c16,f6(c15,c11)),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_10,c_72]) ).

tff(c_213,plain,
    ! [X1_59] :
      ( ~ p2(c16,X1_59)
      | p2(X1_59,f6(c15,c11)) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_88,c_18]) ).

tff(c_235,plain,
    ! [X1_59] :
      ( p2(f6(c15,c11),X1_59)
      | ~ p2(c16,X1_59) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_213,c_52]) ).

tff(c_406,plain,
    ! [X27_81,X28_82] :
      ( ~ p2(f6(X27_81,c11),f3(f4(f5(c12)),c13))
      | ~ p2(f7(c10,X28_82),X27_81)
      | ~ p8(c11,X28_82)
      | ~ p9(X28_82,c10) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_104]) ).

tff(c_409,plain,
    ! [X28_82] :
      ( ~ p2(f7(c10,X28_82),c15)
      | ~ p8(c11,X28_82)
      | ~ p9(X28_82,c10)
      | ~ p2(c16,f3(f4(f5(c12)),c13)) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_235,c_406]) ).

tff(c_3686,plain,
    ! [X28_236] :
      ( ~ p2(f7(c10,X28_236),c15)
      | ~ p8(c11,X28_236)
      | ~ p9(X28_236,c10) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_87,c_409]) ).

tff(c_3694,plain,
    ( ~ p8(c11,c14)
    | ~ p9(c14,c10)
    | ~ p2(c15,c15) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_260,c_3686]) ).

tff(c_3704,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_2,c_4,c_6,c_3694]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13  % Problem  : SYN561-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 17:10:34 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 6.82/2.77  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 6.82/2.78  
% 6.82/2.78  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 6.82/2.81  
% 6.82/2.81  Inference rules
% 6.82/2.81  ----------------------
% 6.82/2.81  #Ref     : 0
% 6.82/2.81  #Sup     : 1111
% 6.82/2.81  #Fact    : 0
% 6.82/2.81  #Define  : 0
% 6.82/2.81  #Split   : 16
% 6.82/2.81  #Chain   : 0
% 6.82/2.81  #Close   : 0
% 6.82/2.81  
% 6.82/2.81  Ordering : KBO
% 6.82/2.81  
% 6.82/2.81  Simplification rules
% 6.82/2.81  ----------------------
% 6.82/2.81  #Subsume      : 114
% 6.82/2.81  #Demod        : 67
% 6.82/2.81  #Tautology    : 33
% 6.82/2.81  #SimpNegUnit  : 5
% 6.82/2.81  #BackRed      : 0
% 6.82/2.81  
% 6.82/2.81  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 6.82/2.81  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 6.82/2.81  
% 6.82/2.81  Timing (in seconds)
% 6.82/2.81  ----------------------
% 6.82/2.81  Preprocessing        : 0.48
% 6.82/2.81  Parsing              : 0.27
% 6.82/2.81  CNF conversion       : 0.03
% 6.82/2.81  Main loop            : 1.23
% 6.82/2.81  Inferencing          : 0.37
% 6.82/2.81  Reduction            : 0.30
% 6.82/2.81  Demodulation         : 0.20
% 6.82/2.81  BG Simplification    : 0.04
% 6.82/2.81  Subsumption          : 0.42
% 6.82/2.81  Abstraction          : 0.04
% 6.82/2.81  MUC search           : 0.00
% 6.82/2.81  Cooper               : 0.00
% 6.82/2.81  Total                : 1.76
% 6.82/2.81  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 6.82/2.81  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 6.82/2.81  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 6.82/2.81  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------