TSTP Solution File: SYN559-1 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : SYN559-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 11:11:18 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 6.13s 2.56s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 6.13s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :   22
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   44 (  16 unt;  14 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   55 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   55 (  30   ~;  25   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   13 (   7   >;   6   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   11 (  11 usr;   7 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   25 (;  25   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ p8 > p7 > p2 > f6 > f5 > f3 > #nlpp > f4 > c9 > c15 > c14 > c13 > c12 > c11 > c10

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(f5,type,
    f5: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(c12,type,
    c12: $i ).

tff(p2,type,
    p2: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(c9,type,
    c9: $i ).

tff(c14,type,
    c14: $i ).

tff(p8,type,
    p8: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(c10,type,
    c10: $i ).

tff(c15,type,
    c15: $i ).

tff(c11,type,
    c11: $i ).

tff(f4,type,
    f4: $i > $i ).

tff(c13,type,
    c13: $i ).

tff(f3,type,
    f3: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(p7,type,
    p7: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(f6,type,
    f6: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(f_23,axiom,
    ! [X0] : p2(X0,X0),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_24,axiom,
    p8(c13,c9),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_25,axiom,
    p7(c10,c13),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_26,axiom,
    p2(f6(c9,c13),c14),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_41,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X0] :
      ( p2(X1,X2)
      | ~ p2(X0,X1)
      | ~ p2(X0,X2) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_28,axiom,
    p2(f3(f4(c11),c12),c15),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_27,axiom,
    p2(f5(c14,c10),c15),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_99,axiom,
    ! [X26,X25] :
      ( ~ p8(X26,c9)
      | ~ p7(c10,X26)
      | ~ p2(f6(c9,X26),X25)
      | ~ p2(f5(X25,c10),f3(f4(c11),c12)) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(c_2,plain,
    ! [X0_1] : p2(X0_1,X0_1),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_23]) ).

tff(c_4,plain,
    p8(c13,c9),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_24]) ).

tff(c_6,plain,
    p7(c10,c13),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_25]) ).

tff(c_8,plain,
    p2(f6(c9,c13),c14),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_26]) ).

tff(c_31,plain,
    ! [X0_32,X2_33,X1_34] :
      ( ~ p2(X0_32,X2_33)
      | ~ p2(X0_32,X1_34)
      | p2(X1_34,X2_33) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_41]) ).

tff(c_47,plain,
    ! [X0_35,X1_36] :
      ( ~ p2(X0_35,X1_36)
      | p2(X1_36,X0_35) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_2,c_31]) ).

tff(c_61,plain,
    p2(c14,f6(c9,c13)),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_8,c_47]) ).

tff(c_16,plain,
    ! [X0_6,X2_5,X1_4] :
      ( ~ p2(X0_6,X2_5)
      | ~ p2(X0_6,X1_4)
      | p2(X1_4,X2_5) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_41]) ).

tff(c_172,plain,
    ! [X1_49] :
      ( ~ p2(c14,X1_49)
      | p2(X1_49,f6(c9,c13)) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_61,c_16]) ).

tff(c_46,plain,
    ! [X0_1,X1_34] :
      ( ~ p2(X0_1,X1_34)
      | p2(X1_34,X0_1) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_2,c_31]) ).

tff(c_195,plain,
    ! [X1_49] :
      ( p2(f6(c9,c13),X1_49)
      | ~ p2(c14,X1_49) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_172,c_46]) ).

tff(c_12,plain,
    p2(f3(f4(c11),c12),c15),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_28]) ).

tff(c_59,plain,
    p2(c15,f3(f4(c11),c12)),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_12,c_47]) ).

tff(c_10,plain,
    p2(f5(c14,c10),c15),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_27]) ).

tff(c_60,plain,
    p2(c15,f5(c14,c10)),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_10,c_47]) ).

tff(c_197,plain,
    ! [X1_50] :
      ( ~ p2(c15,X1_50)
      | p2(X1_50,f5(c14,c10)) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_60,c_16]) ).

tff(c_220,plain,
    ! [X1_50] :
      ( p2(f5(c14,c10),X1_50)
      | ~ p2(c15,X1_50) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_197,c_46]) ).

tff(c_436,plain,
    ! [X25_77,X26_78] :
      ( ~ p2(f5(X25_77,c10),f3(f4(c11),c12))
      | ~ p2(f6(c9,X26_78),X25_77)
      | ~ p7(c10,X26_78)
      | ~ p8(X26_78,c9) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_99]) ).

tff(c_442,plain,
    ! [X26_78] :
      ( ~ p2(f6(c9,X26_78),c14)
      | ~ p7(c10,X26_78)
      | ~ p8(X26_78,c9)
      | ~ p2(c15,f3(f4(c11),c12)) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_220,c_436]) ).

tff(c_3105,plain,
    ! [X26_210] :
      ( ~ p2(f6(c9,X26_210),c14)
      | ~ p7(c10,X26_210)
      | ~ p8(X26_210,c9) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_59,c_442]) ).

tff(c_3113,plain,
    ( ~ p7(c10,c13)
    | ~ p8(c13,c9)
    | ~ p2(c14,c14) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_195,c_3105]) ).

tff(c_3123,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_2,c_4,c_6,c_3113]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13  % Problem  : SYN559-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.00/0.14  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.36  % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.36  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 18:00:25 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 6.13/2.56  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 6.13/2.57  
% 6.13/2.57  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 6.13/2.59  
% 6.13/2.59  Inference rules
% 6.13/2.59  ----------------------
% 6.13/2.59  #Ref     : 0
% 6.13/2.59  #Sup     : 864
% 6.13/2.59  #Fact    : 0
% 6.13/2.59  #Define  : 0
% 6.13/2.59  #Split   : 20
% 6.13/2.59  #Chain   : 0
% 6.13/2.59  #Close   : 0
% 6.13/2.59  
% 6.13/2.59  Ordering : KBO
% 6.13/2.59  
% 6.13/2.59  Simplification rules
% 6.13/2.59  ----------------------
% 6.13/2.59  #Subsume      : 142
% 6.13/2.59  #Demod        : 121
% 6.13/2.59  #Tautology    : 66
% 6.13/2.59  #SimpNegUnit  : 5
% 6.13/2.59  #BackRed      : 0
% 6.13/2.59  
% 6.13/2.59  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 6.13/2.59  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 6.13/2.59  
% 6.13/2.59  Timing (in seconds)
% 6.13/2.59  ----------------------
% 6.13/2.60  Preprocessing        : 0.43
% 6.13/2.60  Parsing              : 0.24
% 6.13/2.60  CNF conversion       : 0.02
% 6.13/2.60  Main loop            : 1.03
% 6.13/2.60  Inferencing          : 0.34
% 6.13/2.60  Reduction            : 0.27
% 6.13/2.60  Demodulation         : 0.18
% 6.13/2.60  BG Simplification    : 0.03
% 6.13/2.60  Subsumption          : 0.31
% 6.13/2.60  Abstraction          : 0.03
% 6.13/2.60  MUC search           : 0.00
% 6.13/2.60  Cooper               : 0.00
% 6.13/2.60  Total                : 1.51
% 6.13/2.60  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 6.13/2.60  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 6.13/2.60  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 6.13/2.60  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------