TSTP Solution File: SYN552-1 by FDP---0.9.16

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : FDP---0.9.16
% Problem  : SYN552-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Bugfixed v2.5.0.
% Transfm  : add_equality
% Format   : protein
% Command  : fdp-casc %s %d

% Computer : art05.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : i686 i686
% CPU      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory   : 2018MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Jan 11 06:30:07 EST 2011

% Result   : Satisfiable 0.42s
% Output   : Assurance 0.42s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 		o===================================o
% 		|      EQuality TRAnsFOrmation      |
% 		| bthomas@informatik.uni-koblenz.de |
% 		o===================================o
% 		          $Revision: 1.14 $
% reading /tmp/SYN552-1+eq_rstfp.tme
% result written to : /tmp/SYN552-1+eq_rstfp-eqt.tme
% FDPLL - A First-Order Davis-Putnam Theorem Prover
% Version 0.9.16 (26/06/2002)
% Proving /tmp/SYN552-1+eq_rstfp-eqt ...
% Done.
% Input File...............: /tmp/SYN552-1+eq_rstfp-eqt.tme
% System...................: Linux art05.cs.miami.edu 2.6.26.8-57.fc8 #1 SMP Thu Dec 18 19:19:45 EST 2008 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
% Automatic mode...........: on
% Time limit...............: 300 seconds
% Current restart interval.: 157 seconds
% Restart with =-axioms....: 225 seconds
% Initial interpretation...: [+(_13180)]
% Clause set type..........: Horn, with equality
% Equality transformation..: on
% Non-constant functions...: yes
% Term depth settings......: 3/2 (Init/Increment)
% unit_extend..............: on
% splitting type...........: exact
% Final tree statistics:
% Tree for clause set......: with equality transformation applied
% # Restarts...............: 0
% Term depth limit.........: 7
% # Splits.................: 0
% # Commits................: 0
% # Unit extension steps...: 17
% # Unit back subsumptions.: 0
% # Branches closed........: 0
% # Level cuts.............: 0
% Time.....................: 0.01 seconds.
% Result...................: SATISFIABLE with model:
%   -(tpos(f(g(_2418_13257), a), f(g(_2418_13263), b)))
%   -(tpos(f(g(_2418_13276), b), f(g(_2418_13282), a)))
%   -(tpos(f(g(a), a), f(g(b), b)))
%   -(tpos(f(g(b), b), f(g(a), a)))
%   -(f(g(_2418_13327), a, f(g(_2418_13333), b)))
%   -(f(g(_2418_13344), b, f(g(_2418_13350), a)))
%   -(f(g(a), a, f(g(b), b)))
%   -(f(g(b), b, f(g(a), a)))
%   -(tpos(a, b))
%   -(tpos(b, a))
%   -(a(b))
%   -(b(a))
%   +(g(X2_2431_13414, g(_2418_13417)))
%   +(a(a))
%   +(b(b))
%   +(g(_2418_13437, g(_2418_13437)))
%   +(f(_2423_13448, _2425_13449, f(_2423_13448, _2425_13449)))
%   +(_13456)
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------