TSTP Solution File: SYN552-1 by E---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1
% Problem  : SYN552-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v2.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 20:17:47 EDT 2023

% Result   : Satisfiable 0.17s 0.46s
% Output   : Saturation 0.17s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named c_0_4)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_0_3,axiom,
    g(X1) = g(X2),
    c1,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_5,plain,
    f(g(X1),b) != f(g(X2),a),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_3]),
    [final] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11  % Problem    : SYN552-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v2.5.0.
% 0.06/0.12  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime   : Mon Oct  2 18:33:59 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.17/0.45  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.17/0.45  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.28Ue8dcbj1/E---3.1_32726.p
% 0.17/0.46  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.17/0.46  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.46  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.46  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.46  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.46  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.46  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.46  # G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 336 completed with status 1
% 0.17/0.46  # Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 0.17/0.46  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.46  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.46  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.46  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.17/0.46  # Search class: FUUPF-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.17/0.46  # partial match(1): FUUPM-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.17/0.46  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.17/0.46  # Starting U----_102_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 811s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.46  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.46  # Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.46  # Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.46  # Starting sh5l with 136s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.46  # U----_102_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 341 completed with status 1
% 0.17/0.46  # Result found by U----_102_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.17/0.46  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.46  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.46  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.46  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.17/0.46  # Search class: FUUPF-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.17/0.46  # partial match(1): FUUPM-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.17/0.46  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.17/0.46  # Starting U----_102_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 811s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.46  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.17/0.46  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.17/0.46  
% 0.17/0.46  # No proof found!
% 0.17/0.46  # SZS status Satisfiable
% 0.17/0.46  # SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 0.17/0.46  # Parsed axioms                        : 2
% 0.17/0.46  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.17/0.46  # Initial clauses                      : 2
% 0.17/0.46  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.17/0.46  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 2
% 0.17/0.46  # Processed clauses                    : 14
% 0.17/0.46  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.17/0.46  # ...subsumed                          : 8
% 0.17/0.46  # ...remaining for further processing  : 6
% 0.17/0.46  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.17/0.46  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.17/0.46  # Backward-subsumed                    : 2
% 0.17/0.46  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.17/0.46  # Generated clauses                    : 14
% 0.17/0.46  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 14
% 0.17/0.46  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.17/0.46  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.17/0.46  # Paramodulations                      : 14
% 0.17/0.46  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.17/0.46  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.17/0.46  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.17/0.46  # Total rewrite steps                  : 0
% 0.17/0.46  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.17/0.46  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.17/0.46  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.17/0.46  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.17/0.46  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.17/0.46  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.17/0.46  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.17/0.46  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.17/0.46  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.17/0.46  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.17/0.46  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.17/0.46  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.17/0.46  # Current number of processed clauses  : 2
% 0.17/0.46  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 0
% 0.17/0.46  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 0.17/0.46  #    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.17/0.46  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 0.17/0.46  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.17/0.46  # ...number of literals in the above   : 0
% 0.17/0.46  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.17/0.46  # Current number of archived clauses   : 4
% 0.17/0.46  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.17/0.46  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.17/0.46  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.17/0.46  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.17/0.46  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.17/0.46  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 8
% 0.17/0.46  # BW rewrite match successes           : 8
% 0.17/0.46  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.17/0.46  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.17/0.46  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 124
% 0.17/0.46  
% 0.17/0.46  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/0.46  # User time                : 0.001 s
% 0.17/0.46  # System time              : 0.001 s
% 0.17/0.46  # Total time               : 0.003 s
% 0.17/0.46  # Maximum resident set size: 1556 pages
% 0.17/0.46  
% 0.17/0.46  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/0.46  # User time                : 0.006 s
% 0.17/0.46  # System time              : 0.005 s
% 0.17/0.46  # Total time               : 0.011 s
% 0.17/0.46  # Maximum resident set size: 1664 pages
% 0.17/0.46  % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.17/0.46  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------