TSTP Solution File: SYN547-1 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : SYN547-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.1.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art03.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 10:19:30 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.05s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP6240/SYN/SYN547-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 43] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 788] [nf = 33] [nu = 9] [ut = 3]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 3075] [nf = 103] [nu = 40] [ut = 9]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 12621] [nf = 403] [nu = 115] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 45478] [nf = 1507] [nu = 216] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 152279] [nf = 5663] [nu = 446] [ut = 17]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 6 secs [nr = 523538] [nf = 20594] [nu = 1670] [ut = 18]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 20 secs [nr = 1732684] [nf = 81170] [nu = 6289] [ut = 18]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 63 secs [nr = 4993980] [nf = 248679] [nu = 19446] [ut = 18]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% Entering time slice 2
% Updating parameters ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 9252180] [nf = 477879] [nu = 36373] [ut = 18]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 9252957] [nf = 477912] [nu = 36394] [ut = 18]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 9256175] [nf = 478052] [nu = 36450] [ut = 18]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 9276009] [nf = 478676] [nu = 36620] [ut = 18]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 124 secs [nr = 9405081] [nf = 485442] [nu = 36924] [ut = 18]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 129 secs [nr = 10257842] [nf = 541142] [nu = 37514] [ut = 18]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 171 secs [nr = 16950368] [nf = 983283] [nu = 39895] [ut = 18]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 42011963
% resolvents: 39298498 factors: 2713465
% Number of unit clauses generated: 49666
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.12
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 1 [2] = 2 [3] = 6
% [4] = 7 [6] = 1 [7] = 1
% Total = 18
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 49666 [2] = 2943505 [3] = 14192496 [4] = 13110994 [5] = 9081927 [6] = 2332931
% [7] = 281934 [8] = 18113 [9] = 369 [10] = 17 [11] = 11
% Average size of a generated clause: 4.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] c1_0 (+)0 (-)1
% [1] c2_0 (+)0 (-)0
% [2] c3_0 (+)1 (-)0
% [3] c4_0 (+)0 (-)0
% [4] c5_0 (+)0 (-)1
% [5] c6_0 (+)1 (-)0
% [6] c7_0 (+)0 (-)0
% [7] c8_0 (+)1 (-)0
% [8] ndr1_0 (+)1 (-)0
% [9] ssSkC0 (+)0 (-)0
% [10] ssSkC1 (+)0 (-)0
% [11] ssSkC10 (+)0 (-)0
% [12] ssSkC11 (+)0 (-)0
% [13] ssSkC12 (+)0 (-)0
% [14] ssSkC13 (+)0 (-)0
% [15] ssSkC14 (+)0 (-)0
% [16] ssSkC15 (+)0 (-)0
% [17] ssSkC16 (+)0 (-)0
% [18] ssSkC17 (+)0 (-)0
% [19] ssSkC18 (+)0 (-)0
% [20] ssSkC19 (+)0 (-)0
% [21] ssSkC2 (+)0 (-)0
% [22] ssSkC20 (+)0 (-)0
% [23] ssSkC21 (+)0 (-)0
% [24] ssSkC22 (+)0 (-)0
% [25] ssSkC23 (+)0 (-)0
% [26] ssSkC24 (+)0 (-)0
% [27] ssSkC25 (+)0 (-)0
% [28] ssSkC26 (+)0 (-)0
% [29] ssSkC3 (+)0 (-)0
% [30] ssSkC4 (+)0 (-)0
% [31] ssSkC5 (+)0 (-)0
% [32] ssSkC6 (+)0 (-)0
% [33] ssSkC7 (+)0 (-)0
% [34] ssSkC8 (+)0 (-)0
% [35] ssSkC9 (+)0 (-)0
% [36] c1_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [37] c2_1_1 (+)0 (-)1
% [38] c3_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [39] c4_1_1 (+)1 (-)0
% [40] c5_1_1 (+)1 (-)1
% [41] c6_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [42] c7_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [43] c8_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [44] ndr1_1_1 (+)2 (-)0
% [45] ssSkP0_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [46] ssSkP1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [47] ssSkP2_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [48] ssSkP3_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [49] ssSkP4_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [50] ssSkP5_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [51] ssSkP6_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [52] ssSkP7_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [53] ssSkP8_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [54] c1_2_2 (+)1 (-)1
% [55] c2_2_2 (+)2 (-)0
% [56] c3_2_2 (+)1 (-)0
% [57] c4_2_2 (+)0 (-)1
% [58] c5_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [59] c6_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [60] c7_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [61] c8_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% ------------------
% Total: (+)12 (-)6
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 18
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 984820249
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 683591264
% Number of successful unifications: 42011963
% Number of unification failures: 703969
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 2
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 580747837
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 1961295614
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 5
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 32594
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 2
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 1
% Number of states in UCFA table: 19
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 18
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 1.06
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 242
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 42715932
% ConstructUnitClause() = 32611
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.00 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 140040
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 304 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------