TSTP Solution File: SYN544-1 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : SYN544-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.1.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art09.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 10:18:02 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.04s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP10087/SYN/SYN544-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 36] [nf = 0] [nu = 16] [ut = 18]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 419] [nf = 0] [nu = 42] [ut = 23]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 972] [nf = 1] [nu = 80] [ut = 26]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 3226] [nf = 12] [nu = 131] [ut = 26]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 5756] [nf = 39] [nu = 210] [ut = 28]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 8517] [nf = 68] [nu = 289] [ut = 28]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 11807] [nf = 101] [nu = 368] [ut = 28]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 15269] [nf = 138] [nu = 447] [ut = 28]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 19406] [nf = 191] [nu = 526] [ut = 28]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 23883] [nf = 258] [nu = 605] [ut = 28]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 28369] [nf = 327] [nu = 684] [ut = 28]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 39350] [nf = 414] [nu = 763] [ut = 28]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 50331] [nf = 501] [nu = 842] [ut = 28]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 61312] [nf = 588] [nu = 921] [ut = 28]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 100809] [nf = 701] [nu = 1000] [ut = 28]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 140306] [nf = 814] [nu = 1079] [ut = 28]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 179803] [nf = 927] [nu = 1158] [ut = 28]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 219300] [nf = 1040] [nu = 1237] [ut = 28]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ...
% t = 4 secs [nr = 258797] [nf = 1153] [nu = 1316] [ut = 28]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 20 ...
% t = 4 secs [nr = 298294] [nf = 1266] [nu = 1395] [ut = 28]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 21 ...
% t = 5 secs [nr = 337791] [nf = 1379] [nu = 1474] [ut = 28]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 22 ...
% t = 5 secs [nr = 377288] [nf = 1492] [nu = 1553] [ut = 28]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 23 ...
% t = 6 secs [nr = 416785] [nf = 1605] [nu = 1632] [ut = 28]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 24 ...
% t = 6 secs [nr = 456282] [nf = 1718] [nu = 1711] [ut = 28]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 25 ...
% t = 7 secs [nr = 495779] [nf = 1831] [nu = 1790] [ut = 28]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 26 ...
% t = 7 secs [nr = 535276] [nf = 1944] [nu = 1869] [ut = 28]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 27 ...
% t = 7 secs [nr = 574773] [nf = 2057] [nu = 1948] [ut = 28]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 28 ...
% t = 8 secs [nr = 614270] [nf = 2170] [nu = 2027] [ut = 28]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 29 ...
% t = 8 secs [nr = 653767] [nf = 2283] [nu = 2106] [ut = 28]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 30 ...
% t = 9 secs [nr = 693264] [nf = 2396] [nu = 2185] [ut = 28]
% Restarting search with different parameters.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 9 secs [nr = 693300] [nf = 2396] [nu = 2201] [ut = 28]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 9 secs [nr = 693683] [nf = 2396] [nu = 2227] [ut = 28]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 9 secs [nr = 694419] [nf = 2400] [nu = 2265] [ut = 28]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 9 secs [nr = 698447] [nf = 2446] [nu = 2426] [ut = 35]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 9 secs [nr = 710642] [nf = 2927] [nu = 3079] [ut = 35]
% Looking for a proof at
% depth = 6 ...
% t = 10 secs [nr = 769137] [nf = 5654] [nu = 5708] [ut = 35]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 12 secs [nr = 1011597] [nf = 14701] [nu = 17587] [ut = 35]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 23 secs [nr = 2024229] [nf = 77313] [nu = 29466] [ut = 35]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 97 secs [nr = 8444937] [nf = 373515] [nu = 41345] [ut = 35]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 27727627
% resolvents: 26328216 factors: 1399411
% Number of unit clauses generated: 53194
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.19
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 10 [1] = 8 [2] = 5 [3] = 3
% [4] = 7 [5] = 2
% Total = 35
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 53194 [2] = 898035 [3] = 2799618 [4] = 5490263 [5] = 6375073 [6] = 6195951
% [7] = 3681114 [8] = 1399707 [9] = 423833 [10] = 195289 [11] = 126823 [12] = 63863
% [13] = 19712 [14] = 3872 [15] = 1280
% Average size of a generated clause: 6.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] c1_0 (+)0 (-)0
% [1] c2_0 (+)0 (-)1
% [2] c3_0 (+)0 (-)1
% [3] c4_0 (+)1 (-)0
% [4] c5_0 (+)0 (-)0
% [5] c6_0 (+)1 (-)0
% [6] c7_0 (+)1 (-)0
% [7] c8_0 (+)0 (-)0
% [8] ndr1_0 (+)1 (-)0
% [9] ssSkC0 (+)0 (-)0
% [10] ssSkC1 (+)0 (-)0
% [11] ssSkC10 (+)0 (-)0
% [12] ssSkC11 (+)0 (-)0
% [13] ssSkC12 (+)0 (-)0
% [14] ssSkC13 (+)0 (-)0
% [15] ssSkC14 (+)0 (-)0
% [16] ssSkC15 (+)0 (-)0
% [17] ssSkC16 (+)0 (-)0
% [18] ssSkC17 (+)0 (-)0
% [19] ssSkC18 (+)0 (-)0
% [20] ssSkC19 (+)0 (-)0
% [21] ssSkC2 (+)0 (-)0
% [22] ssSkC20 (+)0 (-)0
% [23] ssSkC21 (+)0 (-)0
% [24] ssSkC22 (+)0 (-)0
% [25] ssSkC23 (+)0 (-)0
% [26] ssSkC3 (+)0 (-)0
% [27] ssSkC4 (+)0 (-)0
% [28] ssSkC5 (+)0 (-)0
% [29] ssSkC6 (+)0 (-)0
% [30] ssSkC7 (+)0 (-)0
% [31] ssSkC8 (+)0 (-)0
% [32] ssSkC9 (+)0 (-)0
% [33] c1_1_1 (+)0 (-)1
% [34] c2_1_1 (+)0 (-)1
% [35] c3_1_1 (+)1 (-)0
% [36] c4_1_1 (+)0 (-)1
% [37] c5_1_1 (+)2 (-)0
% [38] c6_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [39] c7_1_1 (+)2 (-)1
% [40] c8_1_1 (+)2 (-)1
% [41] ndr1_1_1 (+)3 (-)0
% [42] ssSkP0_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [43] ssSkP1_1 (+)1 (-)0
% [44] ssSkP2_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [45] ssSkP3_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [46] ssSkP4_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [47] ssSkP5_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [48] ssSkP6_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [49] ssSkP7_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [50] ssSkP8_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [51] ssSkP9_1 (+)1 (-)0
% [52] c1_2_2 (+)1 (-)1
% [53] c2_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [54] c3_2_2 (+)1 (-)3
% [55] c4_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [56] c5_2_2 (+)2 (-)0
% [57] c6_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [58] c7_2_2 (+)0 (-)2
% [59] c8_2_2 (+)0 (-)2
% ------------------
% Total: (+)20 (-)15
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 35
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 1866180693
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 1498889855
% Number of successful unifications: 27727627
% Number of unification failures: 18473287
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 8
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 786304856
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 1787970571
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 6
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 11909
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 2
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 1
% Number of states in UCFA table: 33
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 41
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 0.80
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 207
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 46200914
% ConstructUnitClause() = 11934
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.00 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 92425
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 304 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------