TSTP Solution File: SYN539-1 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : SYN539-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.1.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art03.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 10:14:24 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.03s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP5802/SYN/SYN539-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing .......................................................................................................................................................... done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 21] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 170] [nf = 5] [nu = 1] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 415] [nf = 15] [nu = 2] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 824] [nf = 46] [nu = 7] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 1528] [nf = 111] [nu = 14] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 2479] [nf = 205] [nu = 29] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 3643] [nf = 351] [nu = 48] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 4968] [nf = 531] [nu = 75] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 6330] [nf = 721] [nu = 102] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 7746] [nf = 922] [nu = 131] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 9272] [nf = 1150] [nu = 162] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 10932] [nf = 1403] [nu = 201] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 12784] [nf = 1702] [nu = 244] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 14770] [nf = 2029] [nu = 295] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 16778] [nf = 2360] [nu = 346] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 18835] [nf = 2698] [nu = 399] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 21002] [nf = 3063] [nu = 454] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 23303] [nf = 3453] [nu = 517] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 25796] [nf = 3889] [nu = 584] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 20 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 28423] [nf = 4353] [nu = 659] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 21 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 31072] [nf = 4821] [nu = 734] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 22 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 33770] [nf = 5296] [nu = 811] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 23 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 36578] [nf = 5798] [nu = 890] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 24 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 39520] [nf = 6325] [nu = 977] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 25 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 42654] [nf = 6898] [nu = 1068] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 26 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 45922] [nf = 7499] [nu = 1167] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 27 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 49212] [nf = 8104] [nu = 1266] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 28 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 52551] [nf = 8716] [nu = 1367] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 29 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 56000] [nf = 9355] [nu = 1470] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 30 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 59583] [nf = 10019] [nu = 1581] [ut = 2]
% Restarting search with different parameters.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 59604] [nf = 10019] [nu = 1581] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 59753] [nf = 10024] [nu = 1582] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 60080] [nf = 10051] [nu = 1583] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 61229] [nf = 10194] [nu = 1590] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 67063] [nf = 10958] [nu = 1601] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 96914] [nf = 15221] [nu = 1642] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 239303] [nf = 35647] [nu = 1707] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 5 secs [nr = 912773] [nf = 136870] [nu = 1828] [ut = 2]
% Loo
% king for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 21 secs [nr = 4419125] [nf = 788648] [nu = 2021] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 119 secs [nr = 27598744] [nf = 5673302] [nu = 2925] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 85950991
% resolvents: 71563014 factors: 14387977
% Number of unit clauses generated: 3582
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.00
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 1 [2] = 1
% Total = 2
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 3582 [2] = 119838 [3] = 1301078 [4] = 5038630 [5] = 12016717 [6] = 27371852
% [7] = 29245469 [8] = 8690257 [9] = 1969964 [10] = 193604
% Average size of a generated clause: 7.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] c1_0 (+)0 (-)0
% [1] c2_0 (+)0 (-)0
% [2] c3_0 (+)0 (-)0
% [3] c4_0 (+)0 (-)0
% [4] c5_0 (+)1 (-)0
% [5] ndr1_0 (+)1 (-)0
% [6] ssSkC0 (+)0 (-)0
% [7] ssSkC1 (+)0 (-)0
% [8] ssSkC2 (+)0 (-)0
% [9] ssSkC3 (+)0 (-)0
% [10] ssSkC4 (+)0 (-)0
% [11] ssSkC5 (+)0 (-)0
% [12] ssSkC6 (+)0 (-)0
% [13] ssSkC7 (+)0 (-)0
% [14] c1_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [15] c2_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [16] c3_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [17] c4_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [18] c5_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [19] ndr1_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [20] ssSkP0_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [21] ssSkP1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [22] ssSkP2_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [23] ssSkP3_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [24] c1_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [25] c2_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [26] c3_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [27] c4_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [28] c5_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% ------------------
% Total: (+)2 (-)0
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 2
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 1399831541
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 885958095
% Number of successful unifications: 85950991
% Number of unification failures: 12003979
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 1348312257
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 1518079628
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 7
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 1459
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 0
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 0
% Number of states in UCFA table: 2
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 0
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: inf
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 114
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 97954970
% ConstructUnitClause() = 1460
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.00 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 286503
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 304 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------