TSTP Solution File: SYN537-1 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : SYN537-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.1.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art04.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 10:13:13 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.05s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP12788/SYN/SYN537-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing .................................................................................................................. done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 29] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 205] [nf = 6] [nu = 1] [ut = 3]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 606] [nf = 14] [nu = 2] [ut = 3]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 1701] [nf = 81] [nu = 7] [ut = 3]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 3379] [nf = 195] [nu = 16] [ut = 3]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 5444] [nf = 339] [nu = 25] [ut = 3]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 7580] [nf = 486] [nu = 34] [ut = 3]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 9997] [nf = 701] [nu = 47] [ut = 3]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 12609] [nf = 971] [nu = 65] [ut = 3]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 15363] [nf = 1267] [nu = 83] [ut = 3]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 18195] [nf = 1574] [nu = 101] [ut = 3]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 21299] [nf = 1951] [nu = 123] [ut = 3]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 24595] [nf = 2381] [nu = 150] [ut = 3]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 28028] [nf = 2835] [nu = 177] [ut = 3]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 31530] [nf = 3292] [nu = 204] [ut = 3]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 35297] [nf = 3813] [nu = 235] [ut = 3]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 39256] [nf = 4387] [nu = 271] [ut = 3]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 43352] [nf = 4985] [nu = 307] [ut = 3]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 47517] [nf = 5586] [nu = 343] [ut = 3]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 20 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 51947] [nf = 6251] [nu = 383] [ut = 3]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 21 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 56569] [nf = 6969] [nu = 428] [ut = 3]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 22 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 61328] [nf = 7711] [nu = 473] [ut = 3]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 23 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 66156] [nf = 8456] [nu = 518] [ut = 3]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 24 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 71249] [nf = 9265] [nu = 567] [ut = 3]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 25 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 76534] [nf = 10127] [nu = 621] [ut = 3]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 26 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 81956] [nf = 11013] [nu = 675] [ut = 3]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 27 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 87447] [nf = 11902] [nu = 729] [ut = 3]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 28 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 93203] [nf = 12855] [nu = 787] [ut = 3]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 29 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 99151] [nf = 13861] [nu = 850] [ut = 3]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 30 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 105236] [nf = 14891] [nu = 913] [ut = 3]
% Restarting search with different parameters.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 105265] [nf = 14891] [nu = 913] [ut = 3]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 105441] [nf = 14897] [nu = 914] [ut = 3]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 106002] [nf = 14905] [nu = 915] [ut = 3]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 108894] [nf = 15026] [nu = 920] [ut = 3]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 118918] [nf = 15662] [nu = 929] [ut = 3]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 163129] [nf = 19011] [nu = 938] [ut = 3]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 387839] [nf = 40943] [nu = 947] [ut = 3]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 8 secs [nr = 1786161] [nf = 182084] [nu = 992] [ut = 3]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t
% = 44 secs [nr = 11153649] [nf = 1144951] [nu = 1111] [ut = 3]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 82183317
% resolvents: 73743484 factors: 8439833
% Number of unit clauses generated: 1238
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.00
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 2 [2] = 1
% Total = 3
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 1238 [2] = 115034 [3] = 1652337 [4] = 8729418 [5] = 24675314 [6] = 31166859
% [7] = 13940123 [8] = 1723338 [9] = 172872 [10] = 6270 [11] = 381 [12] = 133
% Average size of a generated clause: 6.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] c1_0 (+)1 (-)0
% [1] c2_0 (+)0 (-)0
% [2] c3_0 (+)0 (-)1
% [3] c4_0 (+)0 (-)0
% [4] c5_0 (+)0 (-)0
% [5] ndr1_0 (+)1 (-)0
% [6] ssSkC0 (+)0 (-)0
% [7] ssSkC1 (+)0 (-)0
% [8] ssSkC2 (+)0 (-)0
% [9] ssSkC3 (+)0 (-)0
% [10] ssSkC4 (+)0 (-)0
% [11] ssSkC5 (+)0 (-)0
% [12] c1_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [13] c2_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [14] c3_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [15] c4_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [16] c5_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [17] ndr1_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [18] ssSkP0_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [19] c1_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [20] c2_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [21] c3_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [22] c4_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [23] c5_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% ------------------
% Total: (+)2 (-)1
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 3
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 1845861371
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 654000564
% Number of successful unifications: 82183317
% Number of unification failures: 11171260
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 1454503934
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 1390645069
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 5
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 181
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 0
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 0
% Number of states in UCFA table: 3
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 0
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: inf
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 92
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 93354577
% ConstructUnitClause() = 182
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.00 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 273944
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 304 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------