TSTP Solution File: SYN536+1 by Nitpick---2016
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Nitpick---2016
% Problem : SYN536+1 : TPTP v6.4.0. Released v2.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : isabelle tptp_nitpick %d %s
% Computer : n036.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 2.40GHz
% Memory : 32218.75MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-327.36.3.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Jan 18 18:47:51 EST 2017
% Result : CounterSatisfiable 26.11s
% Output : FiniteModel 26.11s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.04 % Problem : SYN536+1 : TPTP v6.4.0. Released v2.1.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : isabelle tptp_nitpick %d %s
% 0.03/0.25 % Computer : n036.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% 0.03/0.25 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.03/0.25 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 @ 2.40GHz
% 0.03/0.25 % Memory : 32218.75MB
% 0.03/0.25 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-327.36.3.el7.x86_64
% 0.03/0.25 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.03/0.25 % DateTime : Mon Jan 16 02:38:03 CST 2017
% 0.03/0.25 % CPUTime:
% 26.11/10.63 Nitpicking formula...
% 26.11/10.63 Timestamp: 02:38:12
% 26.11/10.63 The type TPTP_Interpret.ind passed the monotonicity test; Nitpick might be
% 26.11/10.63 able to skip some scopes
% 26.11/10.63 Using SAT solver "Lingeling_JNI" The following solvers are configured:
% 26.11/10.63 "Lingeling_JNI", "CryptoMiniSat_JNI", "MiniSat_JNI", "SAT4J", "SAT4J_Light"
% 26.11/10.63 Batch 1 of 20: Trying 5 scopes:
% 26.11/10.63 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 1
% 26.11/10.63 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 2
% 26.11/10.63 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 3
% 26.11/10.63 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 4
% 26.11/10.63 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 5
% 26.11/10.63 % SZS status CounterSatisfiable % SZS output start FiniteModel
% 26.11/10.63 Nitpick found a counterexample for card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 1:
% 26.11/10.63
% 26.11/10.63 Constants:
% 26.11/10.63 bnd_a520 = i1
% 26.11/10.63 bnd_a521 = i1
% 26.11/10.63 bnd_a522 = i1
% 26.11/10.63 bnd_a523 = i1
% 26.11/10.63 bnd_a524 = i1
% 26.11/10.63 bnd_a525 = i1
% 26.11/10.63 bnd_a526 = i1
% 26.11/10.63 bnd_a527 = i1
% 26.11/10.63 bnd_a528 = i1
% 26.11/10.63 bnd_a529 = i1
% 26.11/10.63 bnd_a530 = i1
% 26.11/10.63 bnd_a531 = i1
% 26.11/10.63 bnd_a532 = i1
% 26.11/10.63 bnd_a533 = i1
% 26.11/10.63 bnd_a534 = i1
% 26.11/10.63 bnd_a535 = i1
% 26.11/10.63 bnd_a536 = i1
% 26.11/10.63 bnd_a537 = i1
% 26.11/10.63 bnd_a538 = i1
% 26.11/10.63 bnd_a539 = i1
% 26.11/10.63 bnd_a540 = i1
% 26.11/10.63 bnd_a541 = i1
% 26.11/10.63 bnd_a542 = i1
% 26.11/10.63 bnd_a543 = i1
% 26.11/10.63 bnd_a544 = i1
% 26.11/10.63 bnd_a545 = i1
% 26.11/10.63 bnd_c1_0 = True
% 26.11/10.63 bnd_c1_1 = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := True)
% 26.11/10.63 bnd_c1_2 = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False))
% 26.11/10.63 bnd_c2_0 = False
% 26.11/10.63 bnd_c2_1 = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False)
% 26.11/10.63 bnd_c2_2 = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := True))
% 26.11/10.63 bnd_c3_0 = False
% 26.11/10.63 bnd_c3_1 = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := True)
% 26.11/10.63 bnd_c3_2 = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False))
% 26.11/10.63 bnd_c4_0 = False
% 26.11/10.63 bnd_c4_1 = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False)
% 26.11/10.63 bnd_c4_2 = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := True))
% 26.11/10.63 bnd_c5_0 = False
% 26.11/10.63 bnd_c5_1 = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False)
% 26.11/10.63 bnd_c5_2 = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := True))
% 26.11/10.63 bnd_ndr1_0 = True
% 26.11/10.63 bnd_ndr1_1 = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := True)
% 26.11/10.63 % SZS output end FiniteModel
% 26.11/10.63 Total time: 1.5 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------