TSTP Solution File: SYN535-1 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : SYN535-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.1.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art09.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 10:12:37 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.05s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP9721/SYN/SYN535-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing .................................................................................................... done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 9] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 121] [nf = 5] [nu = 1] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 324] [nf = 14] [nu = 2] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 759] [nf = 47] [nu = 3] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 1292] [nf = 98] [nu = 8] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 1877] [nf = 164] [nu = 15] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 2469] [nf = 232] [nu = 22] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 3071] [nf = 302] [nu = 29] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 3673] [nf = 372] [nu = 36] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 4275] [nf = 442] [nu = 43] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 4877] [nf = 512] [nu = 50] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 5479] [nf = 582] [nu = 57] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 6081] [nf = 652] [nu = 64] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 6683] [nf = 722] [nu = 71] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 7285] [nf = 792] [nu = 78] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 7887] [nf = 862] [nu = 85] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 8489] [nf = 932] [nu = 92] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 9091] [nf = 1002] [nu = 99] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 9693] [nf = 1072] [nu = 106] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 20 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 10295] [nf = 1142] [nu = 113] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 21 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 10897] [nf = 1212] [nu = 120] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 22 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 11499] [nf = 1282] [nu = 127] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 23 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 12101] [nf = 1352] [nu = 134] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 24 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 12703] [nf = 1422] [nu = 141] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 25 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 13305] [nf = 1492] [nu = 148] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 26 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 13907] [nf = 1562] [nu = 155] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 27 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 14509] [nf = 1632] [nu = 162] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 28 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 15111] [nf = 1702] [nu = 169] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 29 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 15713] [nf = 1772] [nu = 176] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 30 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 16315] [nf = 1842] [nu = 183] [ut = 1]
% Restarting search with different parameters.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 16324] [nf = 1842] [nu = 183] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 16436] [nf = 1847] [nu = 184] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 16666] [nf = 1860] [nu = 185] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 17486] [nf = 1940] [nu = 186] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 19731] [nf = 2357] [nu = 191] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 28239] [nf = 3188] [nu = 200] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 56445] [nf = 5828] [nu = 209] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 185890] [nf = 19996] [nu = 218] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 4 secs [nr = 862682] [nf = 105514] [nu = 227] [ut = 1]
% Looking for
% a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 16 secs [nr = 4123605] [nf = 630451] [nu = 236] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 88 secs [nr = 21263428] [nf = 3965193] [nu = 245] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 84127652
% resolvents: 69201033 factors: 14926619
% Number of unit clauses generated: 252
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.00
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [2] = 1
% Total = 1
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 252 [2] = 7020 [3] = 115081 [4] = 1409947 [5] = 8105639 [6] = 25545798
% [7] = 38775832 [8] = 10168083
% Average size of a generated clause: 7.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] c1_0 (+)0 (-)0
% [1] c2_0 (+)0 (-)0
% [2] c3_0 (+)0 (-)0
% [3] c4_0 (+)0 (-)0
% [4] c5_0 (+)0 (-)0
% [5] ndr1_0 (+)1 (-)0
% [6] ssSkC0 (+)0 (-)0
% [7] ssSkC1 (+)0 (-)0
% [8] ssSkC2 (+)0 (-)0
% [9] ssSkC3 (+)0 (-)0
% [10] ssSkC4 (+)0 (-)0
% [11] ssSkC5 (+)0 (-)0
% [12] ssSkC6 (+)0 (-)0
% [13] ssSkC7 (+)0 (-)0
% [14] ssSkC8 (+)0 (-)0
% [15] c1_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [16] c2_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [17] c3_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [18] c4_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [19] c5_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [20] ndr1_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [21] c1_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [22] c2_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [23] c3_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [24] c4_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [25] c5_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% ------------------
% Total: (+)1 (-)0
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 1
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 548750172
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 1163351571
% Number of successful unifications: 84127652
% Number of unification failures: 11350717
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 1259592283
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 2199357475
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 3
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 15
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 0
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 0
% Number of states in UCFA table: 2
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 0
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: inf
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 88
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 95478369
% ConstructUnitClause() = 16
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.00 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 280426
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 303 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------