TSTP Solution File: SYN534-1 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : SYN534-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.1.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art05.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 10:12:28 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.03s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP4500/SYN/SYN534-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ............................................................................. done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 27] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 100] [nf = 4] [nu = 1] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 261] [nf = 12] [nu = 2] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 626] [nf = 45] [nu = 3] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 1185] [nf = 104] [nu = 8] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 1791] [nf = 168] [nu = 13] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 2535] [nf = 248] [nu = 18] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 3321] [nf = 354] [nu = 29] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 4173] [nf = 470] [nu = 40] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 5114] [nf = 618] [nu = 51] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 6195] [nf = 817] [nu = 71] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 7327] [nf = 1035] [nu = 91] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 8517] [nf = 1265] [nu = 111] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 9756] [nf = 1526] [nu = 138] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 11011] [nf = 1787] [nu = 165] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 12316] [nf = 2066] [nu = 192] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 13631] [nf = 2351] [nu = 223] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 14954] [nf = 2636] [nu = 254] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 16305] [nf = 2933] [nu = 285] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 20 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 17670] [nf = 3236] [nu = 318] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 21 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 19051] [nf = 3539] [nu = 351] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 22 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 20482] [nf = 3860] [nu = 384] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 23 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 21923] [nf = 4187] [nu = 421] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 24 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 23372] [nf = 4514] [nu = 458] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 25 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 24849] [nf = 4853] [nu = 495] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 26 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 26340] [nf = 5198] [nu = 534] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 27 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 27847] [nf = 5543] [nu = 573] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 28 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 29404] [nf = 5906] [nu = 612] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 29 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 30971] [nf = 6275] [nu = 655] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 30 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 32546] [nf = 6644] [nu = 698] [ut = 1]
% Restarting search with different parameters.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 32573] [nf = 6644] [nu = 698] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 32646] [nf = 6648] [nu = 699] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 32826] [nf = 6657] [nu = 700] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 33312] [nf = 6688] [nu = 701] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 34465] [nf = 6804] [nu = 704] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 37625] [nf = 7277] [nu = 709] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 49155] [nf = 8626] [nu = 714] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 102989] [nf = 17339] [nu = 727] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 404688] [nf = 71077] [nu = 748] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a pr
% oof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 6 secs [nr = 1963387] [nf = 393142] [nu = 769] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 35 secs [nr = 11392951] [nf = 2619331] [nu = 806] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 226 secs [nr = 70448267] [nf = 18080873] [nu = 869] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 118477536
% resolvents: 95108625 factors: 23368911
% Number of unit clauses generated: 899
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.00
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [2] = 1
% Total = 1
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 899 [2] = 17678 [3] = 265978 [4] = 2381021 [5] = 12409358 [6] = 35083742
% [7] = 43695867 [8] = 21173993 [9] = 2969087 [10] = 430915 [11] = 44413 [12] = 4585
% Average size of a generated clause: 7.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] c1_0 (+)0 (-)0
% [1] c2_0 (+)0 (-)0
% [2] c3_0 (+)0 (-)0
% [3] c4_0 (+)0 (-)0
% [4] c5_0 (+)0 (-)0
% [5] ndr1_0 (+)1 (-)0
% [6] ssSkC0 (+)0 (-)0
% [7] ssSkC1 (+)0 (-)0
% [8] ssSkC2 (+)0 (-)0
% [9] ssSkC3 (+)0 (-)0
% [10] c1_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [11] c2_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [12] c3_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [13] c4_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [14] c5_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [15] ndr1_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [16] ssSkP0_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [17] c1_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [18] c2_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [19] c3_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [20] c4_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [21] c5_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% ------------------
% Total: (+)1 (-)0
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 1
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 1175166055
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 747637352
% Number of successful unifications: 118477536
% Number of unification failures: 4880282
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 1135684748
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 1256341870
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 6
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 69
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 0
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 0
% Number of states in UCFA table: 2
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 0
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: inf
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 77
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 123357818
% ConstructUnitClause() = 70
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.00 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 394925
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 303 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------