TSTP Solution File: SYN533-1 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : SYN533-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.1.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art11.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.00GHz @ 3000MHz
% Memory : 2006MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.31.5-127.fc12.i686.PAE
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 10:11:43 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.01s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP29309/SYN/SYN533-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ............................................................................................ done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 224] [nf = 4] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 470] [nf = 8] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 1372] [nf = 62] [nu = 4] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 2274] [nf = 116] [nu = 8] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 3244] [nf = 178] [nu = 12] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 4223] [nf = 240] [nu = 16] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 5203] [nf = 302] [nu = 20] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 6183] [nf = 364] [nu = 24] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 7170] [nf = 430] [nu = 28] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 8157] [nf = 496] [nu = 32] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 9144] [nf = 562] [nu = 36] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 10131] [nf = 628] [nu = 40] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 11118] [nf = 694] [nu = 44] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 12105] [nf = 760] [nu = 48] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 13092] [nf = 826] [nu = 52] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 14079] [nf = 892] [nu = 56] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 15066] [nf = 958] [nu = 60] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 16053] [nf = 1024] [nu = 64] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 20 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 17040] [nf = 1090] [nu = 68] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 21 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 18027] [nf = 1156] [nu = 72] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 22 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 19014] [nf = 1222] [nu = 76] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 23 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 20001] [nf = 1288] [nu = 80] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 24 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 20988] [nf = 1354] [nu = 84] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 25 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 21975] [nf = 1420] [nu = 88] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 26 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 22962] [nf = 1486] [nu = 92] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 27 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 23949] [nf = 1552] [nu = 96] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 28 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 24936] [nf = 1618] [nu = 100] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 29 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 25923] [nf = 1684] [nu = 104] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 30 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 26910] [nf = 1750] [nu = 108] [ut = 2]
% Restarting search with different parameters.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 26910] [nf = 1750] [nu = 108] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 27134] [nf = 1754] [nu = 108] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 27526] [nf = 1767] [nu = 108] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 30072] [nf = 1898] [nu = 112] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 36120] [nf = 2405] [nu = 116] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 71970] [nf = 3997] [nu = 120] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 223371] [nf = 15414] [nu = 124] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 4 secs [nr = 717227] [nf = 98868] [nu = 128] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 15 secs [nr = 3632809] [nf = 611065] [nu = 132] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a pr
% oof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 66 secs [nr = 14715948] [nf = 3567095] [nu = 136] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 75168851
% resolvents: 58944027 factors: 16224824
% Number of unit clauses generated: 140
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.00
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 1 [4] = 1
% Total = 2
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 140 [2] = 6069 [3] = 243156 [4] = 3347997 [5] = 22720435 [6] = 26532732
% [7] = 16364080 [8] = 5538794 [9] = 351295 [10] = 64153
% Average size of a generated clause: 6.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] c1_0 (+)0 (-)0
% [1] c2_0 (+)0 (-)0
% [2] c3_0 (+)0 (-)0
% [3] c4_0 (+)1 (-)0
% [4] c5_0 (+)0 (-)0
% [5] ndr1_0 (+)1 (-)0
% [6] ssSkC0 (+)0 (-)0
% [7] ssSkC1 (+)0 (-)0
% [8] ssSkC2 (+)0 (-)0
% [9] ssSkC3 (+)0 (-)0
% [10] c1_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [11] c2_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [12] c3_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [13] c4_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [14] c5_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [15] ndr1_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [16] ssSkP0_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [17] ssSkP1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [18] c1_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [19] c2_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [20] c3_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [21] c4_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [22] c5_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% ------------------
% Total: (+)2 (-)0
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 2
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 881433975
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 1107567056
% Number of successful unifications: 75168851
% Number of unification failures: 5170188
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 1243262010
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 1891785212
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 5
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 7
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 0
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 0
% Number of states in UCFA table: 2
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 0
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: inf
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 85
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 80339039
% ConstructUnitClause() = 8
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.00 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 250563
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 304 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------