TSTP Solution File: SYN531-1 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : SYN531-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.1.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art06.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 10:08:51 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.06s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP3408/SYN/SYN531-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing .................................................................................. done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 1] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 69] [nf = 2] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 158] [nf = 7] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 409] [nf = 20] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 832] [nf = 49] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 1290] [nf = 82] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 2114] [nf = 207] [nu = 6] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 3088] [nf = 341] [nu = 12] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 4096] [nf = 475] [nu = 18] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 5676] [nf = 703] [nu = 31] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 7288] [nf = 935] [nu = 44] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 8916] [nf = 1167] [nu = 57] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 10672] [nf = 1439] [nu = 74] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 12428] [nf = 1711] [nu = 91] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 14184] [nf = 1983] [nu = 108] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 15940] [nf = 2255] [nu = 125] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 17696] [nf = 2527] [nu = 142] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 19452] [nf = 2799] [nu = 159] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 21208] [nf = 3071] [nu = 176] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 20 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 22964] [nf = 3343] [nu = 193] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 21 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 24720] [nf = 3615] [nu = 210] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 22 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 26476] [nf = 3887] [nu = 227] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 23 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 28232] [nf = 4159] [nu = 244] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 24 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 29988] [nf = 4431] [nu = 261] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 25 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 31744] [nf = 4703] [nu = 278] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 26 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 33500] [nf = 4975] [nu = 295] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 27 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 35256] [nf = 5247] [nu = 312] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 28 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 37012] [nf = 5519] [nu = 329] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 29 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 38768] [nf = 5791] [nu = 346] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 30 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 40524] [nf = 6063] [nu = 363] [ut = 1]
% Restarting search with different parameters.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 40525] [nf = 6063] [nu = 363] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 40593] [nf = 6065] [nu = 363] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 40717] [nf = 6071] [nu = 363] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 41379] [nf = 6125] [nu = 363] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 43819] [nf = 6382] [nu = 363] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 50723] [nf = 7810] [nu = 363] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 74538] [nf = 13507] [nu = 373] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 148783] [nf = 27752] [nu = 383] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 481643] [nf = 125910] [nu = 395] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a pro
% of at depth = 10 ...
% t = 7 secs [nr = 1819475] [nf = 450576] [nu = 447] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 29 secs [nr = 8565807] [nf = 2022536] [nu = 499] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 143 secs [nr = 41995240] [nf = 9793188] [nu = 583] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 100952026
% resolvents: 79420438 factors: 21531588
% Number of unit clauses generated: 894
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.00
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [7] = 1
% Total = 1
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 894 [2] = 38786 [3] = 787097 [4] = 5470171 [5] = 18436369 [6] = 25790373
% [7] = 17298478 [8] = 23721666 [9] = 8088583 [10] = 1319609
% Average size of a generated clause: 7.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] c1_0 (+)0 (-)0
% [1] c2_0 (+)0 (-)0
% [2] c3_0 (+)0 (-)0
% [3] c4_0 (+)0 (-)0
% [4] c5_0 (+)0 (-)0
% [5] ndr1_0 (+)1 (-)0
% [6] ssSkC0 (+)0 (-)0
% [7] ssSkC1 (+)0 (-)0
% [8] ssSkC2 (+)0 (-)0
% [9] ssSkC3 (+)0 (-)0
% [10] ssSkC4 (+)0 (-)0
% [11] c1_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [12] c2_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [13] c3_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [14] c4_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [15] c5_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [16] ndr1_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [17] ssSkP0_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [18] c1_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [19] c2_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [20] c3_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [21] c4_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [22] c5_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% ------------------
% Total: (+)1 (-)0
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 1
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 1299876909
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 568109164
% Number of successful unifications: 100952026
% Number of unification failures: 6432244
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 1340576153
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 1259122164
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 7
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 357
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 0
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 0
% Number of states in UCFA table: 2
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 0
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: inf
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 81
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 107384270
% ConstructUnitClause() = 358
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.00 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 336507
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 304 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------