TSTP Solution File: SYN530-1 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : SYN530-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.1.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art02.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 10:08:40 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.02s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP10281/SYN/SYN530-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ............................................................................................... done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 1] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 66] [nf = 3] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 143] [nf = 6] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 294] [nf = 15] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 451] [nf = 28] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 621] [nf = 44] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 823] [nf = 69] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 1071] [nf = 99] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 1460] [nf = 162] [nu = 3] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 1909] [nf = 229] [nu = 6] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 2454] [nf = 327] [nu = 11] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 3083] [nf = 431] [nu = 16] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 3900] [nf = 601] [nu = 25] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 4852] [nf = 780] [nu = 34] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 6076] [nf = 1050] [nu = 50] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 7491] [nf = 1330] [nu = 66] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 9284] [nf = 1735] [nu = 91] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 11350] [nf = 2155] [nu = 116] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 13992] [nf = 2765] [nu = 155] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 20 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 17036] [nf = 3394] [nu = 194] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 21 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 20916] [nf = 4304] [nu = 254] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 22 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 25361] [nf = 5239] [nu = 314] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 23 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 30994] [nf = 6570] [nu = 403] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 24 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 37432] [nf = 7935] [nu = 492] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 25 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 45596] [nf = 9879] [nu = 624] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 26 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 54904] [nf = 11867] [nu = 756] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 27 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 66656] [nf = 14678] [nu = 949] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 28 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 80009] [nf = 17548] [nu = 1142] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 29 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 96824] [nf = 21582] [nu = 1421] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 30 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 115895] [nf = 25694] [nu = 1700] [ut = 1]
% Restarting search with different parameters.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 115896] [nf = 25694] [nu = 1700] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 115961] [nf = 25697] [nu = 1700] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 116162] [nf = 25707] [nu = 1700] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 117026] [nf = 25871] [nu = 1700] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 119645] [nf = 26332] [nu = 1700] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 127077] [nf = 28073] [nu = 1700] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 157427] [nf = 36722] [nu = 1700] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 283071] [nf = 82762] [nu = 1700] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 4 secs [nr = 887508] [nf = 274114] [nu = 1716]
% [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 15 secs [nr = 3933862] [nf = 1349338] [nu = 1733] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 79 secs [nr = 21002423] [nf = 7538447] [nu = 1783] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 111301880
% resolvents: 80328320 factors: 30973560
% Number of unit clauses generated: 1842
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.00
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [9] = 1
% Total = 1
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 1842 [2] = 45736 [3] = 466991 [4] = 2166803 [5] = 8972165 [6] = 21230032
% [7] = 36482278 [8] = 29898434 [9] = 10980671 [10] = 1003580 [11] = 51713 [12] = 1419
% [13] = 216
% Average size of a generated clause: 8.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] c1_0 (+)0 (-)0
% [1] c2_0 (+)0 (-)0
% [2] c3_0 (+)0 (-)0
% [3] c4_0 (+)0 (-)0
% [4] c5_0 (+)0 (-)0
% [5] ndr1_0 (+)1 (-)0
% [6] ssSkC0 (+)0 (-)0
% [7] ssSkC1 (+)0 (-)0
% [8] ssSkC2 (+)0 (-)0
% [9] c1_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [10] c2_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [11] c3_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [12] c4_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [13] c5_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [14] ndr1_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [15] ssSkP0_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [16] ssSkP1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [17] ssSkP2_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [18] c1_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [19] c2_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [20] c3_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [21] c4_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [22] c5_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% ------------------
% Total: (+)1 (-)0
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 1
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 1795356431
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 624546288
% Number of successful unifications: 111301880
% Number of unification failures: 3484131
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 1339516870
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 1015640814
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 5
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 337
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 0
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 0
% Number of states in UCFA table: 2
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 0
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: inf
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 87
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 114786011
% ConstructUnitClause() = 338
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.00 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 371006
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 302 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------