TSTP Solution File: SYN528-1 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : SYN528-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.1.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art04.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 10:07:40 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.05s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP12422/SYN/SYN528-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ......................................................................................................................... done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 72] [nf = 4] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 151] [nf = 8] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 322] [nf = 29] [nu = 2] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 494] [nf = 50] [nu = 4] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 700] [nf = 79] [nu = 6] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 913] [nf = 110] [nu = 8] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 1158] [nf = 157] [nu = 10] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 1403] [nf = 204] [nu = 12] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 1654] [nf = 253] [nu = 14] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 1905] [nf = 302] [nu = 16] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 2180] [nf = 355] [nu = 18] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 2455] [nf = 408] [nu = 20] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 2744] [nf = 467] [nu = 22] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 3033] [nf = 526] [nu = 24] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 3328] [nf = 587] [nu = 26] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 3623] [nf = 648] [nu = 28] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 3942] [nf = 713] [nu = 30] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 4261] [nf = 778] [nu = 32] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 20 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 4594] [nf = 849] [nu = 34] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 21 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 4927] [nf = 920] [nu = 36] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 22 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 5266] [nf = 993] [nu = 38] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 23 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 5605] [nf = 1066] [nu = 40] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 24 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 5968] [nf = 1143] [nu = 42] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 25 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 6331] [nf = 1220] [nu = 44] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 26 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 6708] [nf = 1303] [nu = 46] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 27 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 7085] [nf = 1386] [nu = 48] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 28 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 7468] [nf = 1471] [nu = 50] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 29 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 7851] [nf = 1556] [nu = 52] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 30 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 8258] [nf = 1645] [nu = 54] [ut = 1]
% Restarting search with different parameters.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 8258] [nf = 1645] [nu = 54] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 8330] [nf = 1649] [nu = 54] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 8585] [nf = 1677] [nu = 54] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 9345] [nf = 1763] [nu = 56] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 13041] [nf = 2165] [nu = 58] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 25310] [nf = 3697] [nu = 60] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 94451] [nf = 16250] [nu = 62] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 331299] [nf = 59071] [nu = 64] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 6 secs [nr = 1342447] [nf = 291880] [nu = 66] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ..
% .
% t = 27 secs [nr = 5705593] [nf = 1356313] [nu = 68] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 120 secs [nr = 24709261] [nf = 7273326] [nu = 70] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 78090583
% resolvents: 57822436 factors: 20268147
% Number of unit clauses generated: 72
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.00
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [4] = 1
% Total = 1
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 72 [2] = 2196 [3] = 51309 [4] = 612619 [5] = 4917668 [6] = 17879667
% [7] = 30878417 [8] = 23748635
% Average size of a generated clause: 7.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] c1_0 (+)0 (-)0
% [1] c2_0 (+)0 (-)0
% [2] c3_0 (+)0 (-)0
% [3] c4_0 (+)0 (-)0
% [4] c5_0 (+)0 (-)0
% [5] ndr1_0 (+)1 (-)0
% [6] ssSkC0 (+)0 (-)0
% [7] ssSkC1 (+)0 (-)0
% [8] ssSkC2 (+)0 (-)0
% [9] ssSkC3 (+)0 (-)0
% [10] ssSkC4 (+)0 (-)0
% [11] ssSkC5 (+)0 (-)0
% [12] ssSkC6 (+)0 (-)0
% [13] c1_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [14] c2_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [15] c3_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [16] c4_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [17] c5_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [18] ndr1_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [19] ssSkP0_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [20] ssSkP1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [21] ssSkP2_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [22] ssSkP3_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [23] c1_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [24] c2_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [25] c3_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [26] c4_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [27] c5_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% ------------------
% Total: (+)1 (-)0
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 1
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 900941397
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 1012414188
% Number of successful unifications: 78090583
% Number of unification failures: 1595109
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 1121842312
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 1823088922
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 6
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 3
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 0
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 0
% Number of states in UCFA table: 2
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 0
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: inf
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 99
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 79685692
% ConstructUnitClause() = 4
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.00 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 260302
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 303 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------