TSTP Solution File: SYN527-1 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : SYN527-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.1.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art09.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 10:07:30 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.05s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP9283/SYN/SYN527-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing .................................................................................... done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 5] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 100] [nf = 4] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 230] [nf = 8] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 531] [nf = 32] [nu = 2] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 873] [nf = 59] [nu = 4] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 1268] [nf = 90] [nu = 6] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 1680] [nf = 123] [nu = 8] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 2106] [nf = 156] [nu = 10] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 2533] [nf = 189] [nu = 12] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 2960] [nf = 222] [nu = 14] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 3387] [nf = 255] [nu = 16] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 3814] [nf = 288] [nu = 18] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 4241] [nf = 321] [nu = 20] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 4668] [nf = 354] [nu = 22] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 5095] [nf = 387] [nu = 24] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 5522] [nf = 420] [nu = 26] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 5949] [nf = 453] [nu = 28] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 6376] [nf = 486] [nu = 30] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 6803] [nf = 519] [nu = 32] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 20 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 7230] [nf = 552] [nu = 34] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 21 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 7657] [nf = 585] [nu = 36] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 22 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 8084] [nf = 618] [nu = 38] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 23 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 8511] [nf = 651] [nu = 40] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 24 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 8938] [nf = 684] [nu = 42] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 25 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 9365] [nf = 717] [nu = 44] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 26 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 9792] [nf = 750] [nu = 46] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 27 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 10219] [nf = 783] [nu = 48] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 28 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 10646] [nf = 816] [nu = 50] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 29 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 11073] [nf = 849] [nu = 52] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 30 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 11500] [nf = 882] [nu = 54] [ut = 1]
% Restarting search with different parameters.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 11505] [nf = 882] [nu = 54] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 11600] [nf = 886] [nu = 54] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 11947] [nf = 896] [nu = 54] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 13254] [nf = 988] [nu = 56] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 18745] [nf = 1663] [nu = 58] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 40621] [nf = 4912] [nu = 60] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 128160] [nf = 19157] [nu = 62] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 487792] [nf = 92693] [nu = 64] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 8 secs [nr = 2325395] [nf = 528694] [nu = 66] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 40 secs [nr = 11671897] [nf = 3
% 171509] [nu = 68] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 218 secs [nr = 62596643] [nf = 19665741] [nu = 70] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 112633119
% resolvents: 85487526 factors: 27145593
% Number of unit clauses generated: 70
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.00
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [4] = 1
% Total = 1
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 70 [2] = 2231 [3] = 107215 [4] = 1724310 [5] = 12838235 [6] = 34078478
% [7] = 47756922 [8] = 16125658
% Average size of a generated clause: 7.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] c1_0 (+)0 (-)0
% [1] c2_0 (+)0 (-)0
% [2] c3_0 (+)0 (-)0
% [3] c4_0 (+)0 (-)0
% [4] c5_0 (+)0 (-)0
% [5] ndr1_0 (+)1 (-)0
% [6] ssSkC0 (+)0 (-)0
% [7] ssSkC1 (+)0 (-)0
% [8] c1_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [9] c2_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [10] c3_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [11] c4_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [12] c5_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [13] ndr1_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [14] ssSkP0_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [15] ssSkP1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [16] c1_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [17] c2_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [18] c3_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [19] c4_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [20] c5_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% ------------------
% Total: (+)1 (-)0
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 1
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 1158426179
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 699819173
% Number of successful unifications: 112633119
% Number of unification failures: 2401113
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 1389667659
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 1059759152
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 5
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 3
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 0
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 0
% Number of states in UCFA table: 2
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 0
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: inf
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 81
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 115034232
% ConstructUnitClause() = 4
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.00 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 375444
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 303 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------