TSTP Solution File: SYN526-1 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : SYN526-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.1.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art01.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 10:07:12 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.03s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP23232/SYN/SYN526-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ................................................................................................................. done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 6] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 90] [nf = 5] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 265] [nf = 11] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 676] [nf = 35] [nu = 2] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 1961] [nf = 109] [nu = 8] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 3250] [nf = 183] [nu = 14] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 4558] [nf = 261] [nu = 20] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 5896] [nf = 345] [nu = 26] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 7239] [nf = 431] [nu = 32] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 8582] [nf = 517] [nu = 38] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 9925] [nf = 603] [nu = 44] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 11268] [nf = 689] [nu = 50] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 12622] [nf = 783] [nu = 56] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 13976] [nf = 877] [nu = 62] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 15330] [nf = 971] [nu = 68] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 16684] [nf = 1065] [nu = 74] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 18038] [nf = 1159] [nu = 80] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 19392] [nf = 1253] [nu = 86] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 20746] [nf = 1347] [nu = 92] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 20 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 22100] [nf = 1441] [nu = 98] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 21 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 23454] [nf = 1535] [nu = 104] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 22 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 24808] [nf = 1629] [nu = 110] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 23 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 26162] [nf = 1723] [nu = 116] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 24 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 27516] [nf = 1817] [nu = 122] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 25 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 28870] [nf = 1911] [nu = 128] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 26 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 30224] [nf = 2005] [nu = 134] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 27 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 31578] [nf = 2099] [nu = 140] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 28 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 32932] [nf = 2193] [nu = 146] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 29 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 34286] [nf = 2287] [nu = 152] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 30 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 35640] [nf = 2381] [nu = 158] [ut = 2]
% Restarting search with different parameters.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 35646] [nf = 2381] [nu = 158] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 35730] [nf = 2386] [nu = 158] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 35971] [nf = 2393] [nu = 158] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 36967] [nf = 2455] [nu = 160] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 41151] [nf = 2712] [nu = 166] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 54340] [nf = 3637] [nu = 172] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 106393] [nf = 7690] [nu = 178] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 307505] [nf = 29822] [nu = 184] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 4 secs [nr = 999815] [nf = 140148] [nu = 190
% ] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 17 secs [nr = 4088910] [nf = 752929] [nu = 196] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 85 secs [nr = 19417990] [nf = 4354697] [nu = 202] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 84914874
% resolvents: 66472873 factors: 18442001
% Number of unit clauses generated: 208
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.00
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 1 [4] = 1
% Total = 2
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 208 [2] = 4797 [3] = 99845 [4] = 964284 [5] = 7501118 [6] = 20292470
% [7] = 29579119 [8] = 19243851 [9] = 5735731 [10] = 1437643 [11] = 52752 [12] = 2858
% [13] = 198
% Average size of a generated clause: 7.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] c1_0 (+)0 (-)0
% [1] c2_0 (+)0 (-)1
% [2] c3_0 (+)0 (-)0
% [3] c4_0 (+)0 (-)0
% [4] c5_0 (+)0 (-)0
% [5] ndr1_0 (+)1 (-)0
% [6] ssSkC0 (+)0 (-)0
% [7] ssSkC1 (+)0 (-)0
% [8] ssSkC2 (+)0 (-)0
% [9] ssSkC3 (+)0 (-)0
% [10] ssSkC4 (+)0 (-)0
% [11] ssSkC5 (+)0 (-)0
% [12] ssSkC6 (+)0 (-)0
% [13] ssSkC7 (+)0 (-)0
% [14] ssSkC8 (+)0 (-)0
% [15] ssSkC9 (+)0 (-)0
% [16] c1_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [17] c2_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [18] c3_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [19] c4_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [20] c5_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [21] ndr1_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [22] ssSkP0_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [23] c1_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [24] c2_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [25] c3_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [26] c4_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [27] c5_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% ------------------
% Total: (+)1 (-)1
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 2
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 2358716579
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 961850473
% Number of successful unifications: 84914874
% Number of unification failures: 4927741
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 1201083112
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 1294544466
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 6
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 11
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 0
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 0
% Number of states in UCFA table: 3
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 0
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: inf
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 95
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 89842615
% ConstructUnitClause() = 12
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.00 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 283050
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 304 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------