%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : SYN525+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 11:11:09 EDT 2023

% Result   : CounterSatisfiable 4.63s 2.09s
% Output   : Assurance 0s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.14  % Problem  : SYN525+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.1.0.
% 0.16/0.15  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.16/0.36  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.16/0.36  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 17:15:02 EDT 2023
% 0.16/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 4.63/2.09  
% 4.63/2.09  % SZS status CounterSatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 4.63/2.09  
% 4.63/2.09  Inference rules
% 4.63/2.09  ----------------------
% 4.63/2.09  #Ref     : 0
% 4.63/2.09  #Sup     : 3
% 4.63/2.09  #Fact    : 0
% 4.63/2.09  #Define  : 0
% 4.63/2.09  #Split   : 28
% 4.63/2.09  #Chain   : 0
% 4.63/2.09  #Close   : 0
% 4.63/2.09  
% 4.63/2.09  Ordering : KBO
% 4.63/2.09  
% 4.63/2.09  Simplification rules
% 4.63/2.09  ----------------------
% 4.63/2.09  #Subsume      : 113
% 4.63/2.09  #Demod        : 128
% 4.63/2.09  #Tautology    : 100
% 4.63/2.09  #SimpNegUnit  : 71
% 4.63/2.09  #BackRed      : 0
% 4.63/2.09  
% 4.63/2.09  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 4.63/2.09  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 4.63/2.09  
% 4.63/2.09  Timing (in seconds)
% 4.63/2.09  ----------------------
% 4.63/2.09  Preprocessing        : 0.67
% 4.63/2.09  Parsing              : 0.34
% 4.63/2.09  CNF conversion       : 0.05
% 4.63/2.09  Main loop            : 0.40
% 4.63/2.09  Inferencing          : 0.08
% 4.63/2.09  Reduction            : 0.14
% 4.63/2.09  Demodulation         : 0.09
% 4.63/2.09  BG Simplification    : 0.07
% 4.63/2.09  Subsumption          : 0.10
% 4.63/2.09  Abstraction          : 0.02
% 4.63/2.09  MUC search           : 0.00
% 4.63/2.09  Cooper               : 0.00
% 5.07/2.09  Total                : 1.09
% 5.07/2.09  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 5.07/2.09  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 5.07/2.09  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 5.07/2.09  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------