TSTP Solution File: SYN524-1 by CARINE---0.734

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CARINE---0.734
% Problem  : SYN524-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : add_equality
% Format   : carine
% Command  : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000

% Computer : art11.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : i686 i686
% CPU      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.00GHz @ 3000MHz
% Memory   : 2006MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.31.5-127.fc12.i686.PAE
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 10:06:22 EST 2010

% Result   : Timeout 300.01s
% Output   : None 
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP28559/SYN/SYN524-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ..................................................................................................... done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 58] [nf = 3] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 121] [nf = 6] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 255] [nf = 26] [nu = 2] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 394] [nf = 46] [nu = 4] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 535] [nf = 66] [nu = 6] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 696] [nf = 90] [nu = 8] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 861] [nf = 114] [nu = 10] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 1026] [nf = 138] [nu = 12] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 1191] [nf = 162] [nu = 14] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 1356] [nf = 186] [nu = 16] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 1521] [nf = 210] [nu = 18] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 1705] [nf = 250] [nu = 20] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 1889] [nf = 290] [nu = 22] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 2073] [nf = 330] [nu = 24] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 2257] [nf = 370] [nu = 26] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 2441] [nf = 410] [nu = 28] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 2625] [nf = 450] [nu = 30] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 2809] [nf = 490] [nu = 32] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 20 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 2993] [nf = 530] [nu = 34] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 21 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 3177] [nf = 570] [nu = 36] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 22 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 3361] [nf = 610] [nu = 38] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 23 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 3545] [nf = 650] [nu = 40] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 24 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 3729] [nf = 690] [nu = 42] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 25 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 3913] [nf = 730] [nu = 44] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 26 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 4097] [nf = 770] [nu = 46] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 27 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 4281] [nf = 810] [nu = 48] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 28 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 4465] [nf = 850] [nu = 50] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 29 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 4649] [nf = 890] [nu = 52] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 30 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 4833] [nf = 930] [nu = 54] [ut = 1]
% Restarting search with different parameters.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 4833] [nf = 930] [nu = 54] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 4891] [nf = 933] [nu = 54] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 4986] [nf = 940] [nu = 54] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 5326] [nf = 979] [nu = 56] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 6644] [nf = 1138] [nu = 58] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 12196] [nf = 1786] [nu = 60] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 37701] [nf = 4933] [nu = 62] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 149140] [nf = 21593] [nu = 64] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% 	t = 3 secs [nr = 681854] [nf = 131156] [nu = 66] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% 	t = 17 secs [nr = 3208183] [nf = 6
% 86593] [nu = 68] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% 	t = 86 secs [nr = 15573598] [nf = 3863665] [nu = 70] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% |                Statistics                 |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 70657004
% 	resolvents: 54542293	factors: 16114711
% Number of unit clauses generated: 72
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.00
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [4] = 1		
% Total = 1
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 72	[2] = 1255	[3] = 39011	[4] = 697716	[5] = 5675555	[6] = 17253297	
% [7] = 26279330	[8] = 14887396	[9] = 4862577	[10] = 876874	[11] = 79881	[12] = 3698	
% [13] = 342	
% Average size of a generated clause: 7.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] c1_0		(+)0	(-)0
% [1] c2_0		(+)0	(-)0
% [2] c3_0		(+)0	(-)0
% [3] c4_0		(+)0	(-)0
% [4] c5_0		(+)0	(-)0
% [5] ndr1_0		(+)1	(-)0
% [6] ssSkC0		(+)0	(-)0
% [7] ssSkC1		(+)0	(-)0
% [8] ssSkC2		(+)0	(-)0
% [9] ssSkC3		(+)0	(-)0
% [10] ssSkC4		(+)0	(-)0
% [11] c1_1_1		(+)0	(-)0
% [12] c2_1_1		(+)0	(-)0
% [13] c3_1_1		(+)0	(-)0
% [14] c4_1_1		(+)0	(-)0
% [15] c5_1_1		(+)0	(-)0
% [16] ndr1_1_1		(+)0	(-)0
% [17] ssSkP0_1		(+)0	(-)0
% [18] ssSkP1_1		(+)0	(-)0
% [19] c1_2_2		(+)0	(-)0
% [20] c2_2_2		(+)0	(-)0
% [21] c3_2_2		(+)0	(-)0
% [22] c4_2_2		(+)0	(-)0
% [23] c5_2_2		(+)0	(-)0
% 			------------------
% 		Total:	(+)1	(-)0
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 1
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 2110563894
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% 	because of the shortest resolvents table: 1066245728
% Number of successful unifications: 70657004
% Number of unification failures: 4900290
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 1020107904
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 1053584313
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 5
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 3
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 0
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 0
% Number of states in UCFA table: 2
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 0
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: inf
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 89
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 75557294
% ConstructUnitClause() = 4
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.00 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% |                                                      |
%   Inferences per sec: 235523
% |                                                      |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 303 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------