TSTP Solution File: SYN521-1 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : SYN521-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.1.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art02.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 10:03:08 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.03s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP9915/SYN/SYN521-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ...................................................................................................... done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 48] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 308] [nf = 5] [nu = 1] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 617] [nf = 14] [nu = 2] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 1660] [nf = 56] [nu = 5] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 2703] [nf = 98] [nu = 8] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 3753] [nf = 140] [nu = 11] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 4810] [nf = 184] [nu = 14] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 5872] [nf = 230] [nu = 17] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 6934] [nf = 276] [nu = 20] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 7996] [nf = 322] [nu = 23] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 9058] [nf = 368] [nu = 26] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 10120] [nf = 414] [nu = 29] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 11182] [nf = 460] [nu = 32] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 12244] [nf = 506] [nu = 35] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 13306] [nf = 552] [nu = 38] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 14368] [nf = 598] [nu = 41] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 15430] [nf = 644] [nu = 44] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 16492] [nf = 690] [nu = 47] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 17554] [nf = 736] [nu = 50] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 20 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 18616] [nf = 782] [nu = 53] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 21 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 19678] [nf = 828] [nu = 56] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 22 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 20740] [nf = 874] [nu = 59] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 23 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 21802] [nf = 920] [nu = 62] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 24 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 22864] [nf = 966] [nu = 65] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 25 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 23926] [nf = 1012] [nu = 68] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 26 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 24988] [nf = 1058] [nu = 71] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 27 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 26050] [nf = 1104] [nu = 74] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 28 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 27112] [nf = 1150] [nu = 77] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 29 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 28174] [nf = 1196] [nu = 80] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 30 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 29236] [nf = 1242] [nu = 83] [ut = 1]
% Restarting search with different parameters.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 29284] [nf = 1242] [nu = 83] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 29544] [nf = 1247] [nu = 84] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 29883] [nf = 1259] [nu = 85] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 31048] [nf = 1311] [nu = 88] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 32424] [nf = 1401] [nu = 91] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 34453] [nf = 1621] [nu = 94] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 45662] [nf = 2921] [nu = 103] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 153007] [nf = 14906] [nu = 112] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 537326] [nf = 55183] [nu = 121] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at de
% pth = 10 ...
% t = 9 secs [nr = 2247125] [nf = 204687] [nu = 130] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 59 secs [nr = 12523458] [nf = 1244646] [nu = 139] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 64394374
% resolvents: 57622532 factors: 6771842
% Number of unit clauses generated: 144
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.00
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [2] = 1
% Total = 1
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 144 [2] = 4447 [3] = 42878 [4] = 339752 [5] = 4153101 [6] = 12344990
% [7] = 23573080 [8] = 23935982
% Average size of a generated clause: 8.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] c1_0 (+)0 (-)0
% [1] c2_0 (+)0 (-)0
% [2] c3_0 (+)0 (-)0
% [3] c4_0 (+)0 (-)0
% [4] c5_0 (+)0 (-)0
% [5] ndr1_0 (+)1 (-)0
% [6] ssSkC0 (+)0 (-)0
% [7] ssSkC1 (+)0 (-)0
% [8] ssSkC2 (+)0 (-)0
% [9] ssSkC3 (+)0 (-)0
% [10] ssSkC4 (+)0 (-)0
% [11] ssSkC5 (+)0 (-)0
% [12] c1_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [13] c2_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [14] c3_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [15] c4_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [16] c5_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [17] ndr1_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [18] ssSkP0_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [19] c1_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [20] c2_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [21] c3_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [22] c4_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [23] c5_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% ------------------
% Total: (+)1 (-)0
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 1
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 239635211
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 1845302505
% Number of successful unifications: 64394374
% Number of unification failures: 43623905
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 1418356617
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 2161470889
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 6
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 5
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 0
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 0
% Number of states in UCFA table: 2
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 0
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: inf
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 92
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 108018279
% ConstructUnitClause() = 6
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.00 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 214648
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 303 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------