TSTP Solution File: SYN519-1 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : SYN519-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.1.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art09.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 10:01:56 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.03s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP8845/SYN/SYN519-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 208] [nf = 0] [nu = 18] [ut = 13]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 1302] [nf = 17] [nu = 50] [ut = 17]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 3237] [nf = 44] [nu = 96] [ut = 17]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 10014] [nf = 274] [nu = 179] [ut = 18]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 34336] [nf = 979] [nu = 434] [ut = 21]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 135539] [nf = 4373] [nu = 1411] [ut = 29]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 6 secs [nr = 441327] [nf = 23873] [nu = 3714] [ut = 32]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 18 secs [nr = 893844] [nf = 49698] [nu = 8093] [ut = 32]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 38 secs [nr = 1565416] [nf = 82949] [nu = 12990] [ut = 32]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 66 secs [nr = 2415596] [nf = 130144] [nu = 19181] [ut = 32]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 100 secs [nr = 3551328] [nf = 184261] [nu = 27350] [ut = 32]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% Entering time slice 2
% Updating parameters ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 4446433] [nf = 216553] [nu = 33460] [ut = 32]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 4447533] [nf = 216570] [nu = 33492] [ut = 32]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 4451278] [nf = 216618] [nu = 33539] [ut = 32]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 4490926] [nf = 217732] [nu = 33810] [ut = 41]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 125 secs [nr = 4881747] [nf = 227952] [nu = 35960] [ut = 41]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 150 secs [nr = 7998046] [nf = 326016] [nu = 45982] [ut = 41]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 24035310
% resolvents: 22996323 factors: 1038987
% Number of unit clauses generated: 67722
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.28
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 3 [1] = 10 [2] = 4 [4] = 10 [5] = 3 [6] = 8 [7] = 7
% Total = 45
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 67722 [2] = 1664667 [3] = 7015584 [4] = 6914124 [5] = 6454086 [6] = 1720662
% [7] = 173453 [8] = 18943 [9] = 4740 [10] = 1188 [11] = 129 [12] = 12
% Average size of a generated clause: 4.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] c1_0 (+)1 (-)0
% [1] c2_0 (+)1 (-)0
% [2] c3_0 (+)0 (-)1
% [3] c4_0 (+)1 (-)0
% [4] c5_0 (+)0 (-)0
% [5] ndr1_0 (+)1 (-)0
% [6] ssSkC0 (+)0 (-)0
% [7] ssSkC1 (+)0 (-)0
% [8] ssSkC10 (+)0 (-)0
% [9] ssSkC11 (+)0 (-)0
% [10] ssSkC12 (+)0 (-)0
% [11] ssSkC13 (+)0 (-)0
% [12] ssSkC14 (+)0 (-)0
% [13] ssSkC15 (+)0 (-)0
% [14] ssSkC16 (+)0 (-)0
% [15] ssSkC17 (+)0 (-)0
% [16] ssSkC18 (+)1 (-)0
% [17] ssSkC19 (+)0 (-)0
% [18] ssSkC2 (+)0 (-)0
% [19] ssSkC20 (+)0 (-)0
% [20] ssSkC21 (+)0 (-)0
% [21] ssSkC22 (+)0 (-)0
% [22] ssSkC23 (+)0 (-)0
% [23] ssSkC24 (+)0 (-)0
% [24] ssSkC25 (+)0 (-)0
% [25] ssSkC26 (+)0 (-)0
% [26] ssSkC27 (+)0 (-)0
% [27] ssSkC28 (+)0 (-)0
% [28] ssSkC29 (+)0 (-)0
% [29] ssSkC3 (+)0 (-)0
% [30] ssSkC30 (+)0 (-)0
% [31] ssSkC31 (+)0 (-)0
% [32] ssSkC32 (+)0 (-)0
% [33] ssSkC33 (+)0 (-)0
% [34] ssSkC34 (+)0 (-)0
% [35] ssSkC35 (+)0 (-)0
% [36] ssSkC36 (+)0 (-)0
% [37] ssSkC37 (+)0 (-)0
% [38] ssSkC38 (+)0 (-)0
% [39] ssSkC39 (+)0 (-)0
% [40] ssSkC4 (+)0 (-)0
% [41] ssSkC40 (+)0 (-)0
% [42] ssSkC41 (+)0 (-)0
% [43] ssSkC42 (+)0 (-)0
% [44] ssSkC43 (+)0 (-)0
% [45] ssSkC44 (+)0 (-)0
% [46] ssSkC45 (+)0 (-)0
% [47] ssSkC5 (+)0 (-)0
% [48] ssSkC6 (+)0 (-)0
% [49] ssSkC7 (+)0 (-)0
% [50] ssSkC8 (+)0 (-)0
% [51] ssSkC9 (+)0 (-)0
% [52] c0_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [53] c1_1_1 (+)2 (-)2
% [54] c2_1_1 (+)1 (-)1
% [55] c3_1_1 (+)1 (-)2
% [56] c4_1_1 (+)0 (-)1
% [57] c5_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [58] ndr1_1_1 (+)17 (-)0
% [59] ssSkP0_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [60] ssSkP1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [61] ssSkP2_1 (+)1 (-)0
% [62] ssSkP3_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [63] ssSkP4_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [64] ssSkP5_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [65] ssSkP6_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [66] ssSkP7_1 (+)1 (-)0
% [67] ssSkP8_1 (+)1 (-)0
% [68] ssSkP9_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [69] c1_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [70] c2_2_2 (+)1 (-)0
% [71] c3_2_2 (+)2 (-)1
% [72] c4_2_2 (+)1 (-)0
% [73] c5_2_2 (+)1 (-)3
% ------------------
% Total: (+)34 (-)11
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 45
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 1063926822
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 681302569
% Number of successful unifications: 24035310
% Number of unification failures: 7568231
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 12
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 893916163
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 2859436145
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 5
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 32720
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 2
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 1
% Number of states in UCFA table: 29
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 48
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 0.60
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 279
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 31603541
% ConstructUnitClause() = 32762
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.06 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 80118
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 303 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------