TSTP Solution File: SYN518-1 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : SYN518-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.1.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art05.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 10:01:41 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.03s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP3804/SYN/SYN518-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 264] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 2544] [nf = 34] [nu = 89] [ut = 23]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 16592] [nf = 282] [nu = 511] [ut = 44]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 109228] [nf = 2084] [nu = 2587] [ut = 44]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 5 secs [nr = 657004] [nf = 13710] [nu = 13084] [ut = 44]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 27 secs [nr = 3965853] [nf = 79673] [nu = 67551] [ut = 44]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% Entering time slice 2
% Updating parameters ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 17858151] [nf = 374367] [nu = 245568] [ut = 44]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 17860445] [nf = 374401] [nu = 245671] [ut = 44]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 17875723] [nf = 374673] [nu = 246093] [ut = 44]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 124 secs [nr = 17998895] [nf = 377339] [nu = 248169] [ut = 44]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 130 secs [nr = 19082048] [nf = 407117] [nu = 259814] [ut = 49]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 189 secs [nr = 29898674] [nf = 728761] [nu = 335831] [ut = 49]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 50864514
% resolvents: 49510899 factors: 1353615
% Number of unit clauses generated: 422804
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.83
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [2] = 23 [3] = 21
% [5] = 5 [7] = 2
% Total = 51
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 422804 [2] = 11436368 [3] = 24169039 [4] = 10892029 [5] = 3563792 [6] = 363007
% [7] = 17116 [8] = 359
% Average size of a generated clause: 4.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] c1_0 (+)1 (-)0
% [1] c2_0 (+)0 (-)1
% [2] c3_0 (+)0 (-)1
% [3] c4_0 (+)0 (-)1
% [4] c5_0 (+)0 (-)1
% [5] ndr1_0 (+)1 (-)0
% [6] ssSkC0 (+)0 (-)0
% [7] ssSkC1 (+)0 (-)0
% [8] ssSkC10 (+)0 (-)0
% [9] ssSkC11 (+)0 (-)0
% [10] ssSkC12 (+)0 (-)0
% [11] ssSkC13 (+)0 (-)0
% [12] ssSkC14 (+)0 (-)0
% [13] ssSkC15 (+)0 (-)0
% [14] ssSkC16 (+)0 (-)0
% [15] ssSkC17 (+)0 (-)0
% [16] ssSkC18 (+)0 (-)0
% [17] ssSkC19 (+)0 (-)0
% [18] ssSkC2 (+)0 (-)0
% [19] ssSkC20 (+)0 (-)0
% [20] ssSkC21 (+)0 (-)0
% [21] ssSkC22 (+)0 (-)0
% [22] ssSkC23 (+)0 (-)0
% [23] ssSkC24 (+)0 (-)0
% [24] ssSkC25 (+)0 (-)0
% [25] ssSkC26 (+)0 (-)0
% [26] ssSkC27 (+)0 (-)0
% [27] ssSkC3 (+)0 (-)0
% [28] ssSkC4 (+)0 (-)0
% [29] ssSkC5 (+)0 (-)0
% [30] ssSkC6 (+)0 (-)0
% [31] ssSkC7 (+)0 (-)0
% [32] ssSkC8 (+)0 (-)0
% [33] ssSkC9 (+)0 (-)0
% [34] c1_1_1 (+)1 (-)2
% [35] c2_1_1 (+)1 (-)5
% [36] c3_1_1 (+)1 (-)2
% [37] c4_1_1 (+)0 (-)2
% [38] c5_1_1 (+)2 (-)2
% [39] ndr1_1_1 (+)6 (-)0
% [40] ssSkP0_1 (+)1 (-)0
% [41] ssSkP1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [42] ssSkP2_1 (+)1 (-)0
% [43] ssSkP3_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [44] ssSkP4_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [45] ssSkP5_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [46] ssSkP6_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [47] c1_2_2 (+)4 (-)1
% [48] c2_2_2 (+)1 (-)1
% [49] c3_2_2 (+)4 (-)1
% [50] c4_2_2 (+)1 (-)2
% [51] c5_2_2 (+)2 (-)2
% ------------------
% Total: (+)27 (-)24
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 51
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 883981249
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 561283119
% Number of successful unifications: 50864514
% Number of unification failures: 1906250
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 28
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 644148019
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 2483627817
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 5
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 343656
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 2
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 1
% Number of states in UCFA table: 43
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 64
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 0.67
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 237
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 52770764
% ConstructUnitClause() = 343707
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.33 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 169548
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 303 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------