TSTP Solution File: SYN517-1 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : SYN517-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.1.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art04.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 10:01:31 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.06s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP12056/SYN/SYN517-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing .................................................................... done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 83] [nf = 4] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 168] [nf = 8] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 352] [nf = 16] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 566] [nf = 30] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 831] [nf = 47] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 1242] [nf = 102] [nu = 4] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 1714] [nf = 161] [nu = 8] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 2368] [nf = 279] [nu = 22] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 3073] [nf = 411] [nu = 36] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 3866] [nf = 579] [nu = 58] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 4659] [nf = 747] [nu = 80] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 5452] [nf = 915] [nu = 102] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 6245] [nf = 1083] [nu = 124] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 7038] [nf = 1251] [nu = 146] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 7831] [nf = 1419] [nu = 168] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 8624] [nf = 1587] [nu = 190] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 9417] [nf = 1755] [nu = 212] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 10210] [nf = 1923] [nu = 234] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 20 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 11003] [nf = 2091] [nu = 256] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 21 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 11796] [nf = 2259] [nu = 278] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 22 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 12589] [nf = 2427] [nu = 300] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 23 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 13382] [nf = 2595] [nu = 322] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 24 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 14175] [nf = 2763] [nu = 344] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 25 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 14968] [nf = 2931] [nu = 366] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 26 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 15761] [nf = 3099] [nu = 388] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 27 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 16554] [nf = 3267] [nu = 410] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 28 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 17347] [nf = 3435] [nu = 432] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 29 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 18140] [nf = 3603] [nu = 454] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 30 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 18933] [nf = 3771] [nu = 476] [ut = 1]
% Restarting search with different parameters.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 18933] [nf = 3771] [nu = 476] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 19016] [nf = 3775] [nu = 476] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 19187] [nf = 3788] [nu = 476] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 19902] [nf = 3883] [nu = 476] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 22122] [nf = 4271] [nu = 476] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 29923] [nf = 5620] [nu = 476] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 56077] [nf = 14818] [nu = 484] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 154593] [nf = 62807] [nu = 498] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 561135] [nf = 245905] [nu = 608] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 9 secs [nr = 1776514] [nf = 982001] [nu = 726] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 31 secs [nr = 5860968] [nf = 2881065] [nu = 1172] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 91 secs [nr = 15757275] [nf = 6404363] [nu = 1618] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 250 secs [nr = 51387282] [nf = 19514679] [nu = 2064] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 94528577
% resolvents: 68159479 factors: 26369098
% Number of unit clauses generated: 2145
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.00
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [7] = 1
% Total = 1
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 2145 [2] = 81826 [3] = 920233 [4] = 3770496 [5] = 9442208 [6] = 15280726
% [7] = 22554580 [8] = 27593755 [9] = 12344654 [10] = 2537954
% Average size of a generated clause: 8.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] c1_0 (+)0 (-)0
% [1] c2_0 (+)0 (-)0
% [2] c3_0 (+)0 (-)0
% [3] c4_0 (+)0 (-)0
% [4] c5_0 (+)0 (-)0
% [5] ndr1_0 (+)1 (-)0
% [6] ssSkC0 (+)0 (-)0
% [7] ssSkC1 (+)0 (-)0
% [8] ssSkC2 (+)0 (-)0
% [9] c1_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [10] c2_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [11] c3_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [12] c4_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [13] c5_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [14] ndr1_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [15] c1_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [16] c2_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [17] c3_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [18] c4_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [19] c5_2_2 (+)0 (-)0
% ------------------
% Total: (+)1 (-)0
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 1
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 775073930
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 634479174
% Number of successful unifications: 94528577
% Number of unification failures: 2261273
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 1581990709
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 2779175537
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 3
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 459
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 0
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 0
% Number of states in UCFA table: 2
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 0
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: inf
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 74
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 96789850
% ConstructUnitClause() = 460
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.00 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 315095
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 303 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------