TSTP Solution File: SYN513-1 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : SYN513-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.1.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art02.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 09:57:51 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.06s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP9539/SYN/SYN513-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 128] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 945] [nf = 23] [nu = 1] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 3531] [nf = 114] [nu = 8] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 17734] [nf = 652] [nu = 191] [ut = 21]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 94892] [nf = 5373] [nu = 1350] [ut = 21]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 4 secs [nr = 434224] [nf = 22833] [nu = 4785] [ut = 21]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 15 secs [nr = 1972120] [nf = 149093] [nu = 15942] [ut = 21]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 66 secs [nr = 8915858] [nf = 576621] [nu = 52948] [ut = 21]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% Entering time slice 2
% Updating parameters ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 16127916] [nf = 1163524] [nu = 98040] [ut = 21]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 16128799] [nf = 1163547] [nu = 98091] [ut = 21]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 16133154] [nf = 1163704] [nu = 98231] [ut = 21]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 16161798] [nf = 1164875] [nu = 98636] [ut = 22]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 16358804] [nf = 1177730] [nu = 100078] [ut = 25]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 133 secs [nr = 17957147] [nf = 1277251] [nu = 109107] [ut = 27]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 225 secs [nr = 33660869] [nf = 2386495] [nu = 199202] [ut = 31]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 47419388
% resolvents: 44297302 factors: 3122086
% Number of unit clauses generated: 207448
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.44
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [2] = 1 [4] = 21 [5] = 3 [6] = 2 [7] = 4
% [8] = 1
% Total = 32
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 207448 [2] = 6402970 [3] = 17915946 [4] = 9257898 [5] = 9678423 [6] = 3611745
% [7] = 330388 [8] = 14130 [9] = 436 [10] = 4
% Average size of a generated clause: 4.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] c1_0 (+)0 (-)1
% [1] c2_0 (+)0 (-)1
% [2] c3_0 (+)0 (-)0
% [3] c4_0 (+)0 (-)1
% [4] c5_0 (+)1 (-)0
% [5] ndr1_0 (+)1 (-)0
% [6] ssSkC0 (+)0 (-)0
% [7] ssSkC1 (+)0 (-)0
% [8] ssSkC10 (+)0 (-)0
% [9] ssSkC11 (+)0 (-)0
% [10] ssSkC12 (+)0 (-)0
% [11] ssSkC13 (+)0 (-)0
% [12] ssSkC14 (+)0 (-)0
% [13] ssSkC15 (+)0 (-)0
% [14] ssSkC16 (+)0 (-)0
% [15] ssSkC17 (+)0 (-)0
% [16] ssSkC18 (+)0 (-)0
% [17] ssSkC19 (+)0 (-)0
% [18] ssSkC2 (+)0 (-)0
% [19] ssSkC20 (+)0 (-)0
% [20] ssSkC21 (+)0 (-)0
% [21] ssSkC22 (+)0 (-)0
% [22] ssSkC3 (+)0 (-)0
% [23] ssSkC4 (+)0 (-)0
% [24] ssSkC5 (+)0 (-)0
% [25] ssSkC6 (+)0 (-)0
% [26] ssSkC7 (+)0 (-)0
% [27] ssSkC8 (+)0 (-)0
% [28] ssSkC9 (+)0 (-)0
% [29] c1_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [30] c2_1_1 (+)2 (-)0
% [31] c3_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [32] c4_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [33] c5_1_1 (+)1 (-)0
% [34] ndr1_1_1 (+)8 (-)0
% [35] ssSkP0_1 (+)1 (-)0
% [36] ssSkP1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [37] ssSkP2_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [38] ssSkP3_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [39] ssSkP4_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [40] ssSkP5_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [41] ssSkP6_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [42] ssSkP7_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [43] ssSkP8_1 (+)2 (-)0
% [44] ssSkP9_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [45] c1_2_2 (+)0 (-)1
% [46] c2_2_2 (+)3 (-)1
% [47] c3_2_2 (+)2 (-)0
% [48] c4_2_2 (+)2 (-)1
% [49] c5_2_2 (+)1 (-)2
% ------------------
% Total: (+)24 (-)8
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 32
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 844610336
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 679664780
% Number of successful unifications: 47419388
% Number of unification failures: 9525122
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 7
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 761923585
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 2635952775
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 5
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 164335
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 2
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 1
% Number of states in UCFA table: 27
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 40
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 0.68
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 202
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 56944510
% ConstructUnitClause() = 164367
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.20 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 158065
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 303 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------