TSTP Solution File: SYN506-1 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : SYN506-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.1.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art07.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 09:53:39 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.06s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP31161/SYN/SYN506-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing .................................................................................................................................................................................................... done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 16] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 180] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 344] [nf = 4] [nu = 4] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 1350] [nf = 50] [nu = 8] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 5067] [nf = 474] [nu = 54] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 8784] [nf = 898] [nu = 100] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 12618] [nf = 1402] [nu = 146] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 16452] [nf = 1906] [nu = 192] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 20355] [nf = 2470] [nu = 238] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 24258] [nf = 3034] [nu = 284] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 28161] [nf = 3598] [nu = 330] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 32064] [nf = 4162] [nu = 376] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 35967] [nf = 4726] [nu = 422] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 39870] [nf = 5290] [nu = 468] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 43773] [nf = 5854] [nu = 514] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 47676] [nf = 6418] [nu = 560] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 51579] [nf = 6982] [nu = 606] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 55482] [nf = 7546] [nu = 652] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 59385] [nf = 8110] [nu = 698] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 20 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 63288] [nf = 8674] [nu = 744] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 21 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 67191] [nf = 9238] [nu = 790] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 22 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 71094] [nf = 9802] [nu = 836] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 23 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 74997] [nf = 10366] [nu = 882] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 24 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 78900] [nf = 10930] [nu = 928] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 25 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 82803] [nf = 11494] [nu = 974] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 26 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 86706] [nf = 12058] [nu = 1020] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 27 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 90609] [nf = 12622] [nu = 1066] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 28 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 94512] [nf = 13186] [nu = 1112] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 29 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 98415] [nf = 13750] [nu = 1158] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 30 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 102318] [nf = 14314] [nu = 1204] [ut = 1]
% Restarting search with different parameters.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 102334] [nf = 14314] [nu = 1204] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 102498] [nf = 14314] [nu = 1204] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 102662] [nf = 14318] [nu = 1208] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 103799] [nf = 14366] [nu = 1212] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 112063] [nf = 14994] [nu = 1258] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 182103] [nf = 18972] [nu = 1304] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 5 secs [nr = 933417] [nf = 78629] [nu = 1350] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 .
% ..
% t = 33 secs [nr = 6728230] [nf = 669727] [nu = 1396] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 274 secs [nr = 38822996] [nf = 5315074] [nu = 1442] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 48408996
% resolvents: 42447448 factors: 5961548
% Number of unit clauses generated: 1444
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.00
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [3] = 1
% Total = 1
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 1444 [2] = 33190 [3] = 227348 [4] = 1470160 [5] = 10656222 [6] = 28400038
% [7] = 6223079 [8] = 1366835 [9] = 30680
% Average size of a generated clause: 6.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] hskp0 (+)0 (-)0
% [1] hskp1 (+)0 (-)0
% [2] hskp10 (+)0 (-)0
% [3] hskp11 (+)0 (-)0
% [4] hskp12 (+)0 (-)0
% [5] hskp13 (+)0 (-)0
% [6] hskp14 (+)0 (-)0
% [7] hskp15 (+)0 (-)0
% [8] hskp16 (+)0 (-)0
% [9] hskp17 (+)0 (-)0
% [10] hskp18 (+)0 (-)0
% [11] hskp19 (+)0 (-)0
% [12] hskp2 (+)0 (-)0
% [13] hskp20 (+)0 (-)0
% [14] hskp21 (+)0 (-)0
% [15] hskp22 (+)0 (-)0
% [16] hskp23 (+)0 (-)0
% [17] hskp24 (+)0 (-)0
% [18] hskp25 (+)0 (-)0
% [19] hskp26 (+)0 (-)0
% [20] hskp27 (+)0 (-)0
% [21] hskp28 (+)0 (-)0
% [22] hskp3 (+)0 (-)0
% [23] hskp4 (+)0 (-)0
% [24] hskp5 (+)0 (-)0
% [25] hskp6 (+)0 (-)0
% [26] hskp7 (+)0 (-)0
% [27] hskp8 (+)0 (-)0
% [28] hskp9 (+)0 (-)0
% [29] ndr1_0 (+)1 (-)0
% [30] c0_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [31] c1_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [32] c2_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [33] c3_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% ------------------
% Total: (+)1 (-)0
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 1
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 247995515
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 1144196555
% Number of successful unifications: 48408996
% Number of unification failures: 123233566
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 2223226855
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 3218146021
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 2
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 91
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 0
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 0
% Number of states in UCFA table: 2
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 0
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: inf
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 97
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 171642562
% ConstructUnitClause() = 92
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.00 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 161363
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 303 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------