TSTP Solution File: SYN505-1 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : SYN505-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.1.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art11.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.00GHz @ 3000MHz
% Memory : 2006MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.31.5-127.fc12.i686.PAE
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 09:55:19 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.01s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP27253/SYN/SYN505-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ................................................................................................................................................................................................................ done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 132] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 264] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 1716] [nf = 66] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 7423] [nf = 726] [nu = 66] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 13134] [nf = 1388] [nu = 132] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 18927] [nf = 2106] [nu = 198] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 24720] [nf = 2824] [nu = 264] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 30585] [nf = 3604] [nu = 330] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 36450] [nf = 4384] [nu = 396] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 42315] [nf = 5164] [nu = 462] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 48180] [nf = 5944] [nu = 528] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 54045] [nf = 6724] [nu = 594] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 59910] [nf = 7504] [nu = 660] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 65775] [nf = 8284] [nu = 726] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 71640] [nf = 9064] [nu = 792] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 77505] [nf = 9844] [nu = 858] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 83370] [nf = 10624] [nu = 924] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 89235] [nf = 11404] [nu = 990] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 20 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 95100] [nf = 12184] [nu = 1056] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 21 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 100965] [nf = 12964] [nu = 1122] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 22 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 106830] [nf = 13744] [nu = 1188] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 23 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 112695] [nf = 14524] [nu = 1254] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 24 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 118560] [nf = 15304] [nu = 1320] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 25 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 124425] [nf = 16084] [nu = 1386] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 26 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 130290] [nf = 16864] [nu = 1452] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 27 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 136155] [nf = 17644] [nu = 1518] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 28 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 142020] [nf = 18424] [nu = 1584] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 29 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 147885] [nf = 19204] [nu = 1650] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 30 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 153750] [nf = 19984] [nu = 1716] [ut = 1]
% Restarting search with different parameters.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 153750] [nf = 19984] [nu = 1716] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 153882] [nf = 19984] [nu = 1716] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 154014] [nf = 19984] [nu = 1716] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 155466] [nf = 20050] [nu = 1716] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 163529] [nf = 20783] [nu = 1782] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 273942] [nf = 27190] [nu = 1848] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 8 secs [nr = 1612823] [nf = 125640] [nu = 1914] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 37 secs [nr = 6565202] [nf = 719562] [nu = 1980] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 262 secs [nr = 31777065] [nf = 4558997] [nu = 2046] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 42649309
% resolvents: 37374955 factors: 5274354
% Number of unit clauses generated: 2056
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.00
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [5] = 1
% Total = 1
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 2056 [2] = 27958 [3] = 224701 [4] = 1031375 [5] = 9332570 [6] = 20264283
% [7] = 11131608 [8] = 619842 [9] = 14916
% Average size of a generated clause: 7.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] hskp0 (+)0 (-)0
% [1] hskp1 (+)0 (-)0
% [2] hskp10 (+)0 (-)0
% [3] hskp11 (+)0 (-)0
% [4] hskp12 (+)0 (-)0
% [5] hskp13 (+)0 (-)0
% [6] hskp14 (+)0 (-)0
% [7] hskp15 (+)0 (-)0
% [8] hskp16 (+)0 (-)0
% [9] hskp17 (+)0 (-)0
% [10] hskp18 (+)0 (-)0
% [11] hskp19 (+)0 (-)0
% [12] hskp2 (+)0 (-)0
% [13] hskp20 (+)0 (-)0
% [14] hskp21 (+)0 (-)0
% [15] hskp22 (+)0 (-)0
% [16] hskp23 (+)0 (-)0
% [17] hskp24 (+)0 (-)0
% [18] hskp25 (+)0 (-)0
% [19] hskp26 (+)0 (-)0
% [20] hskp27 (+)0 (-)0
% [21] hskp28 (+)0 (-)0
% [22] hskp29 (+)0 (-)0
% [23] hskp3 (+)0 (-)0
% [24] hskp30 (+)0 (-)0
% [25] hskp31 (+)0 (-)0
% [26] hskp4 (+)0 (-)0
% [27] hskp5 (+)0 (-)0
% [28] hskp6 (+)0 (-)0
% [29] hskp7 (+)0 (-)0
% [30] hskp8 (+)0 (-)0
% [31] hskp9 (+)0 (-)0
% [32] ndr1_0 (+)1 (-)0
% [33] c0_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [34] c1_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [35] c2_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [36] c3_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% ------------------
% Total: (+)1 (-)0
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 1
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 257378632
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 1048822512
% Number of successful unifications: 42649309
% Number of unification failures: 108174212
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 2415178636
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 3210588877
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 2
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 131
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 0
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 0
% Number of states in UCFA table: 2
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 0
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: inf
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 103
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 150823521
% ConstructUnitClause() = 132
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.00 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 142164
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 302 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------