TSTP Solution File: SYN494-1 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : SYN494-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.1.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art03.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 09:46:57 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.06s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP3821/SYN/SYN494-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ........................................................ done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 12] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 24] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 156] [nf = 6] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 675] [nf = 66] [nu = 6] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 1194] [nf = 126] [nu = 12] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 1722] [nf = 192] [nu = 18] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 2250] [nf = 258] [nu = 24] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 2783] [nf = 328] [nu = 30] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 3316] [nf = 398] [nu = 36] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 3849] [nf = 468] [nu = 42] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 4382] [nf = 538] [nu = 48] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 4915] [nf = 608] [nu = 54] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 5448] [nf = 678] [nu = 60] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 5981] [nf = 748] [nu = 66] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 6514] [nf = 818] [nu = 72] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 7047] [nf = 888] [nu = 78] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 7580] [nf = 958] [nu = 84] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 8113] [nf = 1028] [nu = 90] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 20 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 8646] [nf = 1098] [nu = 96] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 21 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 9179] [nf = 1168] [nu = 102] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 22 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 9712] [nf = 1238] [nu = 108] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 23 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 10245] [nf = 1308] [nu = 114] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 24 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 10778] [nf = 1378] [nu = 120] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 25 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 11311] [nf = 1448] [nu = 126] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 26 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 11844] [nf = 1518] [nu = 132] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 27 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 12377] [nf = 1588] [nu = 138] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 28 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 12910] [nf = 1658] [nu = 144] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 29 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 13443] [nf = 1728] [nu = 150] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 30 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 13976] [nf = 1798] [nu = 156] [ut = 1]
% Restarting search with different parameters.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 13976] [nf = 1798] [nu = 156] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 13988] [nf = 1798] [nu = 156] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 14000] [nf = 1798] [nu = 156] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 14132] [nf = 1804] [nu = 156] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 14752] [nf = 1870] [nu = 162] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 17537] [nf = 2138] [nu = 168] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 34467] [nf = 4261] [nu = 174] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 90233] [nf = 14023] [nu = 180] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 258314] [nf = 43815] [nu = 186] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 5 secs [nr = 1246946] [nf
% = 200626] [nu = 192] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 24 secs [nr = 6446803] [nf = 1336146] [nu = 198] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 117 secs [nr = 32630173] [nf = 8503481] [nu = 204] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 105129255
% resolvents: 78473187 factors: 26656068
% Number of unit clauses generated: 210
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.00
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [5] = 1
% Total = 1
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 210 [2] = 13260 [3] = 195531 [4] = 4134041 [5] = 16211835 [6] = 37636622
% [7] = 31883476 [8] = 11856341 [9] = 3197939
% Average size of a generated clause: 7.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] hskp0 (+)0 (-)0
% [1] hskp1 (+)0 (-)0
% [2] hskp10 (+)0 (-)0
% [3] hskp11 (+)0 (-)0
% [4] hskp2 (+)0 (-)0
% [5] hskp3 (+)0 (-)0
% [6] hskp4 (+)0 (-)0
% [7] hskp5 (+)0 (-)0
% [8] hskp6 (+)0 (-)0
% [9] hskp7 (+)0 (-)0
% [10] hskp8 (+)0 (-)0
% [11] hskp9 (+)0 (-)0
% [12] ndr1_0 (+)1 (-)0
% [13] c0_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [14] c1_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [15] c2_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [16] c3_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% ------------------
% Total: (+)1 (-)0
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 1
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 103749160
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 2020021142
% Number of successful unifications: 105129255
% Number of unification failures: 81172248
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 1796545836
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 2007240699
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 3
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 11
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 0
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 0
% Number of states in UCFA table: 2
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 0
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: inf
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 63
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 186301503
% ConstructUnitClause() = 12
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.00 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 350431
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 304 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------