TSTP Solution File: SYN492-1 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : SYN492-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.1.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art09.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 09:45:49 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.05s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP7809/SYN/SYN492-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ............................................................ done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 12] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 24] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 156] [nf = 6] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 675] [nf = 66] [nu = 6] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 1194] [nf = 126] [nu = 12] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 1725] [nf = 194] [nu = 18] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 2256] [nf = 262] [nu = 24] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 2787] [nf = 330] [nu = 30] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 3318] [nf = 398] [nu = 36] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 3849] [nf = 466] [nu = 42] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 4380] [nf = 534] [nu = 48] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 4911] [nf = 602] [nu = 54] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 5442] [nf = 670] [nu = 60] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 5973] [nf = 738] [nu = 66] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 6504] [nf = 806] [nu = 72] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 7035] [nf = 874] [nu = 78] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 7566] [nf = 942] [nu = 84] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 8097] [nf = 1010] [nu = 90] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 20 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 8628] [nf = 1078] [nu = 96] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 21 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 9159] [nf = 1146] [nu = 102] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 22 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 9690] [nf = 1214] [nu = 108] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 23 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 10221] [nf = 1282] [nu = 114] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 24 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 10752] [nf = 1350] [nu = 120] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 25 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 11283] [nf = 1418] [nu = 126] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 26 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 11814] [nf = 1486] [nu = 132] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 27 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 12345] [nf = 1554] [nu = 138] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 28 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 12876] [nf = 1622] [nu = 144] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 29 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 13407] [nf = 1690] [nu = 150] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 30 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 13938] [nf = 1758] [nu = 156] [ut = 1]
% Restarting search with different parameters.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 13938] [nf = 1758] [nu = 156] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 13950] [nf = 1758] [nu = 156] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 13962] [nf = 1758] [nu = 156] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 14094] [nf = 1764] [nu = 156] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 14725] [nf = 1827] [nu = 162] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 18123] [nf = 2087] [nu = 168] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 35876] [nf = 3730] [nu = 174] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 91934] [nf = 8939] [nu = 180] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 248149] [nf = 25245] [nu = 186] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 5 secs [nr = 1159820]
% [nf = 141173] [nu = 192] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 25 secs [nr = 5240676] [nf = 1064083] [nu = 198] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 100 secs [nr = 21234167] [nf = 5232205] [nu = 204] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 86388025
% resolvents: 67978454 factors: 18409571
% Number of unit clauses generated: 210
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.00
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [5] = 1
% Total = 1
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 210 [2] = 11286 [3] = 351768 [4] = 4463850 [5] = 16602118 [6] = 39873413
% [7] = 25085380
% Average size of a generated clause: 6.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] hskp0 (+)0 (-)0
% [1] hskp1 (+)0 (-)0
% [2] hskp10 (+)0 (-)0
% [3] hskp11 (+)0 (-)0
% [4] hskp12 (+)0 (-)0
% [5] hskp2 (+)0 (-)0
% [6] hskp3 (+)0 (-)0
% [7] hskp4 (+)0 (-)0
% [8] hskp5 (+)0 (-)0
% [9] hskp6 (+)0 (-)0
% [10] hskp7 (+)0 (-)0
% [11] hskp8 (+)0 (-)0
% [12] hskp9 (+)0 (-)0
% [13] ndr1_0 (+)1 (-)0
% [14] c0_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [15] c1_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [16] c2_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [17] c3_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% ------------------
% Total: (+)1 (-)0
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 1
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 52389775
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 1643987297
% Number of successful unifications: 86388025
% Number of unification failures: 68344797
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 1275590859
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 3383560713
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 2
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 11
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 0
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 0
% Number of states in UCFA table: 2
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 0
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: inf
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 65
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 154732822
% ConstructUnitClause() = 12
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.00 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 287960
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 302 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------