TSTP Solution File: SYN491-1 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : SYN491-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.1.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art01.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 09:45:42 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.03s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP21700/SYN/SYN491-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ............................................ done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 24] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 48] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 312] [nf = 12] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 1344] [nf = 132] [nu = 12] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 2380] [nf = 254] [nu = 24] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 3427] [nf = 384] [nu = 36] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 4474] [nf = 514] [nu = 48] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 5528] [nf = 650] [nu = 60] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 6582] [nf = 786] [nu = 72] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 7636] [nf = 922] [nu = 84] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 8690] [nf = 1058] [nu = 96] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 9744] [nf = 1194] [nu = 108] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 10798] [nf = 1330] [nu = 120] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 11852] [nf = 1466] [nu = 132] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 12906] [nf = 1602] [nu = 144] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 13960] [nf = 1738] [nu = 156] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 15014] [nf = 1874] [nu = 168] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 16068] [nf = 2010] [nu = 180] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 20 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 17122] [nf = 2146] [nu = 192] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 21 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 18176] [nf = 2282] [nu = 204] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 22 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 19230] [nf = 2418] [nu = 216] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 23 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 20284] [nf = 2554] [nu = 228] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 24 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 21338] [nf = 2690] [nu = 240] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 25 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 22392] [nf = 2826] [nu = 252] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 26 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 23446] [nf = 2962] [nu = 264] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 27 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 24500] [nf = 3098] [nu = 276] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 28 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 25554] [nf = 3234] [nu = 288] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 29 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 26608] [nf = 3370] [nu = 300] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 30 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 27662] [nf = 3506] [nu = 312] [ut = 1]
% Restarting search with different parameters.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 27662] [nf = 3506] [nu = 312] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 27686] [nf = 3506] [nu = 312] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 27710] [nf = 3506] [nu = 312] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 27974] [nf = 3518] [nu = 312] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 29006] [nf = 3638] [nu = 324] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 30147] [nf = 3798] [nu = 336] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 33802] [nf = 4478] [nu = 348] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 53613] [nf = 9073] [nu = 360] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 105173] [nf = 21893] [nu = 372] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 1 secs [n
% r = 263775] [nf = 49174] [nu = 384] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 4 secs [nr = 1223341] [nf = 199077] [nu = 396] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 21 secs [nr = 7464371] [nf = 1210312] [nu = 408] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 43437758] [nf = 8292335] [nu = 420] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 128616971
% resolvents: 104008261 factors: 24608710
% Number of unit clauses generated: 432
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.00
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [5] = 1
% Total = 1
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 432 [2] = 5708 [3] = 76398 [4] = 859050 [5] = 5930887 [6] = 25089942
% [7] = 33831376 [8] = 37533050 [9] = 21997953 [10] = 2880199 [11] = 358716 [12] = 53260
% Average size of a generated clause: 8.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] hskp0 (+)0 (-)0
% [1] hskp1 (+)0 (-)0
% [2] hskp2 (+)0 (-)0
% [3] hskp3 (+)0 (-)0
% [4] hskp4 (+)0 (-)0
% [5] hskp5 (+)0 (-)0
% [6] hskp6 (+)0 (-)0
% [7] hskp7 (+)0 (-)0
% [8] hskp8 (+)0 (-)0
% [9] ndr1_0 (+)1 (-)0
% [10] c0_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [11] c1_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [12] c2_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [13] c3_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% ------------------
% Total: (+)1 (-)0
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 1
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 171034773
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 1598545443
% Number of successful unifications: 128616971
% Number of unification failures: 60679757
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 1786610790
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 1432935700
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 4
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 23
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 0
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 0
% Number of states in UCFA table: 2
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 0
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: inf
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 57
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 189296728
% ConstructUnitClause() = 24
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.00 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 428723
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 303 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------