TSTP Solution File: SYN490-1 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : SYN490-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.1.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art04.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 09:45:30 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.01s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP11028/SYN/SYN490-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ................................................................ done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 24] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 48] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 312] [nf = 12] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 1347] [nf = 132] [nu = 12] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 2382] [nf = 252] [nu = 24] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 3426] [nf = 378] [nu = 36] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 4470] [nf = 504] [nu = 48] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 5514] [nf = 630] [nu = 60] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 6558] [nf = 756] [nu = 72] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 7602] [nf = 882] [nu = 84] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 8646] [nf = 1008] [nu = 96] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 9690] [nf = 1134] [nu = 108] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 10734] [nf = 1260] [nu = 120] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 11778] [nf = 1386] [nu = 132] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 12822] [nf = 1512] [nu = 144] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 13866] [nf = 1638] [nu = 156] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 14910] [nf = 1764] [nu = 168] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 15954] [nf = 1890] [nu = 180] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 20 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 16998] [nf = 2016] [nu = 192] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 21 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 18042] [nf = 2142] [nu = 204] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 22 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 19086] [nf = 2268] [nu = 216] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 23 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 20130] [nf = 2394] [nu = 228] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 24 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 21174] [nf = 2520] [nu = 240] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 25 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 22218] [nf = 2646] [nu = 252] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 26 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 23262] [nf = 2772] [nu = 264] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 27 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 24306] [nf = 2898] [nu = 276] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 28 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 25350] [nf = 3024] [nu = 288] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 29 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 26394] [nf = 3150] [nu = 300] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 30 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 27438] [nf = 3276] [nu = 312] [ut = 1]
% Restarting search with different parameters.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 27438] [nf = 3276] [nu = 312] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 27462] [nf = 3276] [nu = 312] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 27486] [nf = 3276] [nu = 312] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 27750] [nf = 3288] [nu = 312] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 28896] [nf = 3414] [nu = 324] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 32719] [nf = 3757] [nu = 336] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 56131] [nf = 5768] [nu = 348] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 146356] [nf = 15863] [nu = 360] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 371168] [nf = 42943] [nu = 372] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth =
% 10 ...
% t = 8 secs [nr = 1760382] [nf = 192795] [nu = 384] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 35 secs [nr = 8015118] [nf = 1321340] [nu = 396] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 143 secs [nr = 34249022] [nf = 7162133] [nu = 408] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 83962558
% resolvents: 66401115 factors: 17561443
% Number of unit clauses generated: 418
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.00
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [5] = 1
% Total = 1
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 418 [2] = 8162 [3] = 148789 [4] = 3146728 [5] = 14781905 [6] = 37406377
% [7] = 28470179
% Average size of a generated clause: 7.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] hskp0 (+)0 (-)0
% [1] hskp1 (+)0 (-)0
% [2] hskp10 (+)0 (-)0
% [3] hskp11 (+)0 (-)0
% [4] hskp12 (+)0 (-)0
% [5] hskp13 (+)0 (-)0
% [6] hskp2 (+)0 (-)0
% [7] hskp3 (+)0 (-)0
% [8] hskp4 (+)0 (-)0
% [9] hskp5 (+)0 (-)0
% [10] hskp6 (+)0 (-)0
% [11] hskp7 (+)0 (-)0
% [12] hskp8 (+)0 (-)0
% [13] hskp9 (+)0 (-)0
% [14] ndr1_0 (+)1 (-)0
% [15] c0_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [16] c1_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [17] c2_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [18] c3_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% ------------------
% Total: (+)1 (-)0
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 1
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 70210038
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 1451011862
% Number of successful unifications: 83962558
% Number of unification failures: 63029273
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 1513599710
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 3400023600
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 2
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 23
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 0
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 0
% Number of states in UCFA table: 2
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 0
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: inf
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 67
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 146991831
% ConstructUnitClause() = 24
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.00 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 279875
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 304 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------