TSTP Solution File: SYN488-1 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : SYN488-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.1.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art11.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.00GHz @ 3000MHz
% Memory : 2006MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.31.5-127.fc12.i686.PAE
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 09:44:40 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.01s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP25892/SYN/SYN488-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ............................................................................................................................................................................................................ done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 72] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 144] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 936] [nf = 36] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 4069] [nf = 396] [nu = 36] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 7202] [nf = 756] [nu = 72] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 10413] [nf = 1170] [nu = 108] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 13624] [nf = 1584] [nu = 144] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 16902] [nf = 2056] [nu = 180] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 20180] [nf = 2528] [nu = 216] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 23458] [nf = 3000] [nu = 252] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 26736] [nf = 3472] [nu = 288] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 30014] [nf = 3944] [nu = 324] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 33292] [nf = 4416] [nu = 360] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 36570] [nf = 4888] [nu = 396] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 39848] [nf = 5360] [nu = 432] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 43126] [nf = 5832] [nu = 468] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 46404] [nf = 6304] [nu = 504] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 49682] [nf = 6776] [nu = 540] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 20 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 52960] [nf = 7248] [nu = 576] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 21 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 56238] [nf = 7720] [nu = 612] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 22 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 59516] [nf = 8192] [nu = 648] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 23 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 62794] [nf = 8664] [nu = 684] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 24 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 66072] [nf = 9136] [nu = 720] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 25 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 69350] [nf = 9608] [nu = 756] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 26 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 72628] [nf = 10080] [nu = 792] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 27 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 75906] [nf = 10552] [nu = 828] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 28 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 79184] [nf = 11024] [nu = 864] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 29 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 82462] [nf = 11496] [nu = 900] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 30 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 85740] [nf = 11968] [nu = 936] [ut = 1]
% Restarting search with different parameters.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 85740] [nf = 11968] [nu = 936] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 85812] [nf = 11968] [nu = 936] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 85884] [nf = 11968] [nu = 936] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 86822] [nf = 12005] [nu = 936] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 95871] [nf = 12577] [nu = 972] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 201362] [nf = 18762] [nu = 1008] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 6 secs [nr = 1222279] [nf = 90295] [nu = 1044] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 44 sec
% s [nr = 7181875] [nf = 715895] [nu = 1080] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 37113618
% resolvents: 32356618 factors: 4757000
% Number of unit clauses generated: 1116
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.00
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [5] = 1
% Total = 1
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 1116 [2] = 15732 [3] = 134837 [4] = 908231 [5] = 8376359 [6] = 23035817
% [7] = 3946614 [8] = 682870 [9] = 12042
% Average size of a generated clause: 6.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] hskp0 (+)0 (-)0
% [1] hskp1 (+)0 (-)0
% [2] hskp10 (+)0 (-)0
% [3] hskp11 (+)0 (-)0
% [4] hskp12 (+)0 (-)0
% [5] hskp13 (+)0 (-)0
% [6] hskp14 (+)0 (-)0
% [7] hskp15 (+)0 (-)0
% [8] hskp16 (+)0 (-)0
% [9] hskp17 (+)0 (-)0
% [10] hskp18 (+)0 (-)0
% [11] hskp19 (+)0 (-)0
% [12] hskp2 (+)0 (-)0
% [13] hskp20 (+)0 (-)0
% [14] hskp21 (+)0 (-)0
% [15] hskp22 (+)0 (-)0
% [16] hskp23 (+)0 (-)0
% [17] hskp24 (+)0 (-)0
% [18] hskp25 (+)0 (-)0
% [19] hskp26 (+)0 (-)0
% [20] hskp27 (+)0 (-)0
% [21] hskp28 (+)0 (-)0
% [22] hskp29 (+)0 (-)0
% [23] hskp3 (+)0 (-)0
% [24] hskp30 (+)0 (-)0
% [25] hskp31 (+)0 (-)0
% [26] hskp4 (+)0 (-)0
% [27] hskp5 (+)0 (-)0
% [28] hskp6 (+)0 (-)0
% [29] hskp7 (+)0 (-)0
% [30] hskp8 (+)0 (-)0
% [31] hskp9 (+)0 (-)0
% [32] ndr1_0 (+)1 (-)0
% [33] c0_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [34] c1_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [35] c2_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [36] c3_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% ------------------
% Total: (+)1 (-)0
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 1
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 267631396
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 1412783126
% Number of successful unifications: 37113618
% Number of unification failures: 120374701
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 2066717882
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 3058980051
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 2
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 71
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 0
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 0
% Number of states in UCFA table: 2
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 0
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: inf
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 103
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 157488319
% ConstructUnitClause() = 72
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.00 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 123712
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 303 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------