TSTP Solution File: SYN484-1 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : SYN484-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.1.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art03.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 09:41:13 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.05s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP3455/SYN/SYN484-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 60] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 120] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 780] [nf = 30] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 3390] [nf = 330] [nu = 30] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 6002] [nf = 630] [nu = 60] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 8700] [nf = 990] [nu = 90] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 11398] [nf = 1350] [nu = 120] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 14192] [nf = 1794] [nu = 150] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 16986] [nf = 2238] [nu = 180] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 19780] [nf = 2682] [nu = 210] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 22574] [nf = 3126] [nu = 240] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 25368] [nf = 3570] [nu = 270] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 28162] [nf = 4014] [nu = 300] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 30956] [nf = 4458] [nu = 330] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 33750] [nf = 4902] [nu = 360] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 36544] [nf = 5346] [nu = 390] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 39338] [nf = 5790] [nu = 420] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 42132] [nf = 6234] [nu = 450] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 20 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 44926] [nf = 6678] [nu = 480] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 21 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 47720] [nf = 7122] [nu = 510] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 22 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 50514] [nf = 7566] [nu = 540] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 23 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 53308] [nf = 8010] [nu = 570] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 24 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 56102] [nf = 8454] [nu = 600] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 25 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 58896] [nf = 8898] [nu = 630] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 26 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 61690] [nf = 9342] [nu = 660] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 27 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 64484] [nf = 9786] [nu = 690] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 28 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 67278] [nf = 10230] [nu = 720] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 29 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 70072] [nf = 10674] [nu = 750] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 30 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 72866] [nf = 11118] [nu = 780] [ut = 1]
% Restarting search with different parameters.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 72866] [nf = 11118] [nu = 780] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 72926] [nf = 11118] [nu = 780] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 72986] [nf = 11118] [nu = 780] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 73788] [nf = 11149] [nu = 780] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 81412] [nf = 11648] [nu = 810] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 166632] [nf = 17126] [nu = 840] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 5 secs [nr = 1032474] [nf = 83475] [nu = 870] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 35 secs [nr = 62325
% 80] [nf = 693649] [nu = 900] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 278 secs [nr = 31705098] [nf = 5239341] [nu = 930] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 40048260
% resolvents: 34299229 factors: 5749031
% Number of unit clauses generated: 932
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.00
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [5] = 1
% Total = 1
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 932 [2] = 13388 [3] = 122232 [4] = 963143 [5] = 9148088 [6] = 23329794
% [7] = 5423361 [8] = 1022280 [9] = 25042
% Average size of a generated clause: 6.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] hskp0 (+)0 (-)0
% [1] hskp1 (+)0 (-)0
% [2] hskp10 (+)0 (-)0
% [3] hskp11 (+)0 (-)0
% [4] hskp12 (+)0 (-)0
% [5] hskp13 (+)0 (-)0
% [6] hskp14 (+)0 (-)0
% [7] hskp15 (+)0 (-)0
% [8] hskp16 (+)0 (-)0
% [9] hskp17 (+)0 (-)0
% [10] hskp18 (+)0 (-)0
% [11] hskp19 (+)0 (-)0
% [12] hskp2 (+)0 (-)0
% [13] hskp20 (+)0 (-)0
% [14] hskp21 (+)0 (-)0
% [15] hskp22 (+)0 (-)0
% [16] hskp23 (+)0 (-)0
% [17] hskp24 (+)0 (-)0
% [18] hskp25 (+)0 (-)0
% [19] hskp26 (+)0 (-)0
% [20] hskp27 (+)0 (-)0
% [21] hskp28 (+)0 (-)0
% [22] hskp29 (+)0 (-)0
% [23] hskp3 (+)0 (-)0
% [24] hskp30 (+)0 (-)0
% [25] hskp4 (+)0 (-)0
% [26] hskp5 (+)0 (-)0
% [27] hskp6 (+)0 (-)0
% [28] hskp7 (+)0 (-)0
% [29] hskp8 (+)0 (-)0
% [30] hskp9 (+)0 (-)0
% [31] ndr1_0 (+)1 (-)0
% [32] c0_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [33] c1_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [34] c2_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [35] c3_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% ------------------
% Total: (+)1 (-)0
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 1
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 237093136
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 1446649103
% Number of successful unifications: 40048260
% Number of unification failures: 127781763
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 2222811116
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 3113128685
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 2
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 59
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 0
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 0
% Number of states in UCFA table: 2
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 0
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: inf
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 101
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 167830023
% ConstructUnitClause() = 60
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.00 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 133494
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 303 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------