TSTP Solution File: SYN483-1 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : SYN483-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.1.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art09.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 09:40:14 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.03s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP7407/SYN/SYN483-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing .................................................................................................................................................................................................... done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 120] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 240] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 1560] [nf = 60] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 6750] [nf = 660] [nu = 60] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 11940] [nf = 1260] [nu = 120] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 17205] [nf = 1908] [nu = 180] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 22470] [nf = 2556] [nu = 240] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 27802] [nf = 3262] [nu = 300] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 33134] [nf = 3968] [nu = 360] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 38466] [nf = 4674] [nu = 420] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 43798] [nf = 5380] [nu = 480] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 49130] [nf = 6086] [nu = 540] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 54462] [nf = 6792] [nu = 600] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 59794] [nf = 7498] [nu = 660] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 65126] [nf = 8204] [nu = 720] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 70458] [nf = 8910] [nu = 780] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 75790] [nf = 9616] [nu = 840] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 81122] [nf = 10322] [nu = 900] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 20 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 86454] [nf = 11028] [nu = 960] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 21 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 91786] [nf = 11734] [nu = 1020] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 22 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 97118] [nf = 12440] [nu = 1080] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 23 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 102450] [nf = 13146] [nu = 1140] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 24 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 107782] [nf = 13852] [nu = 1200] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 25 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 113114] [nf = 14558] [nu = 1260] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 26 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 118446] [nf = 15264] [nu = 1320] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 27 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 123778] [nf = 15970] [nu = 1380] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 28 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 129110] [nf = 16676] [nu = 1440] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 29 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 134442] [nf = 17382] [nu = 1500] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 30 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 139774] [nf = 18088] [nu = 1560] [ut = 1]
% Restarting search with different parameters.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 139774] [nf = 18088] [nu = 1560] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 139894] [nf = 18088] [nu = 1560] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 140014] [nf = 18088] [nu = 1560] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 141334] [nf = 18148] [nu = 1560] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 148686] [nf = 18815] [nu = 1620] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 241545] [nf = 24290] [nu = 1680] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 6 secs [nr = 1292991] [nf = 103100] [nu = 1740] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a pr
% oof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 25 secs [nr = 4950790] [nf = 524650] [nu = 1800] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 182 secs [nr = 24363123] [nf = 3306325] [nu = 1860] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 48536583
% resolvents: 42946444 factors: 5590139
% Number of unit clauses generated: 1890
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.00
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [5] = 1
% Total = 1
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 1890 [2] = 26322 [3] = 213422 [4] = 1159957 [5] = 8867544 [6] = 21033062
% [7] = 15821398 [8] = 1358889 [9] = 54099
% Average size of a generated clause: 7.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] hskp0 (+)0 (-)0
% [1] hskp1 (+)0 (-)0
% [2] hskp10 (+)0 (-)0
% [3] hskp11 (+)0 (-)0
% [4] hskp12 (+)0 (-)0
% [5] hskp13 (+)0 (-)0
% [6] hskp14 (+)0 (-)0
% [7] hskp15 (+)0 (-)0
% [8] hskp16 (+)0 (-)0
% [9] hskp17 (+)0 (-)0
% [10] hskp18 (+)0 (-)0
% [11] hskp19 (+)0 (-)0
% [12] hskp2 (+)0 (-)0
% [13] hskp20 (+)0 (-)0
% [14] hskp21 (+)0 (-)0
% [15] hskp22 (+)0 (-)0
% [16] hskp23 (+)0 (-)0
% [17] hskp24 (+)0 (-)0
% [18] hskp25 (+)0 (-)0
% [19] hskp26 (+)0 (-)0
% [20] hskp27 (+)0 (-)0
% [21] hskp28 (+)0 (-)0
% [22] hskp29 (+)0 (-)0
% [23] hskp3 (+)0 (-)0
% [24] hskp4 (+)0 (-)0
% [25] hskp5 (+)0 (-)0
% [26] hskp6 (+)0 (-)0
% [27] hskp7 (+)0 (-)0
% [28] hskp8 (+)0 (-)0
% [29] hskp9 (+)0 (-)0
% [30] ndr1_0 (+)1 (-)0
% [31] c0_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [32] c1_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [33] c2_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [34] c3_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% ------------------
% Total: (+)1 (-)0
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 1
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 281521113
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 1384245432
% Number of successful unifications: 48536583
% Number of unification failures: 88154000
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 2276627498
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 2952885759
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 2
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 119
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 0
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 0
% Number of states in UCFA table: 2
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 0
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: inf
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 99
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 136690583
% ConstructUnitClause() = 120
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.00 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 161789
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 303 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------