TSTP Solution File: SYN482-1 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : SYN482-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.1.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art04.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 09:40:07 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.03s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP10590/SYN/SYN482-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ........................................................................................................................................................................................................ done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 72] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 144] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 936] [nf = 36] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 4055] [nf = 396] [nu = 36] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 7174] [nf = 756] [nu = 72] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 10403] [nf = 1190] [nu = 108] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 13632] [nf = 1624] [nu = 144] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 16944] [nf = 2130] [nu = 180] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 20256] [nf = 2636] [nu = 216] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 23568] [nf = 3142] [nu = 252] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 26880] [nf = 3648] [nu = 288] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 30192] [nf = 4154] [nu = 324] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 33504] [nf = 4660] [nu = 360] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 36816] [nf = 5166] [nu = 396] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 40128] [nf = 5672] [nu = 432] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 43440] [nf = 6178] [nu = 468] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 46752] [nf = 6684] [nu = 504] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 50064] [nf = 7190] [nu = 540] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 20 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 53376] [nf = 7696] [nu = 576] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 21 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 56688] [nf = 8202] [nu = 612] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 22 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 60000] [nf = 8708] [nu = 648] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 23 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 63312] [nf = 9214] [nu = 684] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 24 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 66624] [nf = 9720] [nu = 720] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 25 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 69936] [nf = 10226] [nu = 756] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 26 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 73248] [nf = 10732] [nu = 792] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 27 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 76560] [nf = 11238] [nu = 828] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 28 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 79872] [nf = 11744] [nu = 864] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 29 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 83184] [nf = 12250] [nu = 900] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 30 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 86496] [nf = 12756] [nu = 936] [ut = 1]
% Restarting search with different parameters.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 86496] [nf = 12756] [nu = 936] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 86568] [nf = 12756] [nu = 936] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 86640] [nf = 12756] [nu = 936] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 87573] [nf = 12793] [nu = 936] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 95233] [nf = 13300] [nu = 972] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 169877] [nf = 17823] [nu = 1008] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 5 secs [nr = 874576] [nf = 71117] [nu = 1044] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 32 secs [n
% r = 5652138] [nf = 575563] [nu = 1080] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 234 secs [nr = 27728416] [nf = 4185091] [nu = 1116] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 42318683
% resolvents: 36525689 factors: 5792994
% Number of unit clauses generated: 1128
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.00
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [5] = 1
% Total = 1
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 1128 [2] = 16476 [3] = 142086 [4] = 996914 [5] = 8593457 [6] = 22821066
% [7] = 7065074 [8] = 2618366 [9] = 64116
% Average size of a generated clause: 7.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] hskp0 (+)0 (-)0
% [1] hskp1 (+)0 (-)0
% [2] hskp10 (+)0 (-)0
% [3] hskp11 (+)0 (-)0
% [4] hskp12 (+)0 (-)0
% [5] hskp13 (+)0 (-)0
% [6] hskp14 (+)0 (-)0
% [7] hskp15 (+)0 (-)0
% [8] hskp16 (+)0 (-)0
% [9] hskp17 (+)0 (-)0
% [10] hskp18 (+)0 (-)0
% [11] hskp19 (+)0 (-)0
% [12] hskp2 (+)0 (-)0
% [13] hskp20 (+)0 (-)0
% [14] hskp21 (+)0 (-)0
% [15] hskp22 (+)0 (-)0
% [16] hskp23 (+)0 (-)0
% [17] hskp24 (+)0 (-)0
% [18] hskp25 (+)0 (-)0
% [19] hskp26 (+)0 (-)0
% [20] hskp27 (+)0 (-)0
% [21] hskp28 (+)0 (-)0
% [22] hskp29 (+)0 (-)0
% [23] hskp3 (+)0 (-)0
% [24] hskp30 (+)0 (-)0
% [25] hskp4 (+)0 (-)0
% [26] hskp5 (+)0 (-)0
% [27] hskp6 (+)0 (-)0
% [28] hskp7 (+)0 (-)0
% [29] hskp8 (+)0 (-)0
% [30] hskp9 (+)0 (-)0
% [31] ndr1_0 (+)1 (-)0
% [32] c0_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [33] c1_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [34] c2_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [35] c3_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% ------------------
% Total: (+)1 (-)0
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 1
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 220491175
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 1405950475
% Number of successful unifications: 42318683
% Number of unification failures: 120105520
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 2210932961
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 3141536542
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 2
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 71
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 0
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 0
% Number of states in UCFA table: 2
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 0
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: inf
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 101
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 162424203
% ConstructUnitClause() = 72
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.00 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 141062
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 304 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------