TSTP Solution File: SYN479-1 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : SYN479-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.1.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art11.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.00GHz @ 3000MHz
% Memory : 2006MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.31.5-127.fc12.i686.PAE
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 09:38:53 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.01s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP25281/SYN/SYN479-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ........................................................................................................................................................................................................ done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 8] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 144] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 280] [nf = 2] [nu = 2] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 1376] [nf = 52] [nu = 4] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 5566] [nf = 534] [nu = 54] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 9756] [nf = 1016] [nu = 104] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 14060] [nf = 1576] [nu = 154] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 18364] [nf = 2136] [nu = 204] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 22735] [nf = 2754] [nu = 254] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 27106] [nf = 3372] [nu = 304] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 31477] [nf = 3990] [nu = 354] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 35848] [nf = 4608] [nu = 404] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 40219] [nf = 5226] [nu = 454] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 44590] [nf = 5844] [nu = 504] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 48961] [nf = 6462] [nu = 554] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 53332] [nf = 7080] [nu = 604] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 57703] [nf = 7698] [nu = 654] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 62074] [nf = 8316] [nu = 704] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 66445] [nf = 8934] [nu = 754] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 20 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 70816] [nf = 9552] [nu = 804] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 21 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 75187] [nf = 10170] [nu = 854] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 22 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 79558] [nf = 10788] [nu = 904] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 23 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 83929] [nf = 11406] [nu = 954] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 24 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 88300] [nf = 12024] [nu = 1004] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 25 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 92671] [nf = 12642] [nu = 1054] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 26 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 97042] [nf = 13260] [nu = 1104] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 27 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 101413] [nf = 13878] [nu = 1154] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 28 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 105784] [nf = 14496] [nu = 1204] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 29 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 110155] [nf = 15114] [nu = 1254] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 30 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 114526] [nf = 15732] [nu = 1304] [ut = 1]
% Restarting search with different parameters.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 114534] [nf = 15732] [nu = 1304] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 114670] [nf = 15732] [nu = 1304] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 114806] [nf = 15734] [nu = 1306] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 115902] [nf = 15784] [nu = 1308] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 121715] [nf = 16312] [nu = 1358] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 193833] [nf = 20404] [nu = 1408] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 5 secs [nr = 947520] [nf = 78084] [nu = 1458] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at
% depth = 8 ...
% t = 19 secs [nr = 3438391] [nf = 352426] [nu = 1508] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 140 secs [nr = 18600320] [nf = 2245399] [nu = 1558] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 44712042
% resolvents: 39793083 factors: 4918959
% Number of unit clauses generated: 1590
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.00
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [3] = 1
% Total = 1
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 1590 [2] = 23250 [3] = 179821 [4] = 1080027 [5] = 7559582 [6] = 19423493
% [7] = 13220313 [8] = 3144248 [9] = 79718
% Average size of a generated clause: 7.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] hskp0 (+)0 (-)0
% [1] hskp1 (+)0 (-)0
% [2] hskp10 (+)0 (-)0
% [3] hskp11 (+)0 (-)0
% [4] hskp12 (+)0 (-)0
% [5] hskp13 (+)0 (-)0
% [6] hskp14 (+)0 (-)0
% [7] hskp15 (+)0 (-)0
% [8] hskp16 (+)0 (-)0
% [9] hskp17 (+)0 (-)0
% [10] hskp18 (+)0 (-)0
% [11] hskp19 (+)0 (-)0
% [12] hskp2 (+)0 (-)0
% [13] hskp20 (+)0 (-)0
% [14] hskp21 (+)0 (-)0
% [15] hskp22 (+)0 (-)0
% [16] hskp23 (+)0 (-)0
% [17] hskp24 (+)0 (-)0
% [18] hskp25 (+)0 (-)0
% [19] hskp26 (+)0 (-)0
% [20] hskp27 (+)0 (-)0
% [21] hskp28 (+)0 (-)0
% [22] hskp29 (+)0 (-)0
% [23] hskp3 (+)0 (-)0
% [24] hskp30 (+)0 (-)0
% [25] hskp4 (+)0 (-)0
% [26] hskp5 (+)0 (-)0
% [27] hskp6 (+)0 (-)0
% [28] hskp7 (+)0 (-)0
% [29] hskp8 (+)0 (-)0
% [30] hskp9 (+)0 (-)0
% [31] ndr1_0 (+)1 (-)0
% [32] c0_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [33] c1_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [34] c2_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [35] c3_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% ------------------
% Total: (+)1 (-)0
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 1
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 204592956
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 1581388040
% Number of successful unifications: 44712042
% Number of unification failures: 76151695
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 2040194911
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 2480766794
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 2
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 99
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 0
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 0
% Number of states in UCFA table: 2
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 0
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: inf
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 101
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 120863737
% ConstructUnitClause() = 100
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.00 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 149040
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 303 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------