TSTP Solution File: SYN478-1 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : SYN478-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.1.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art07.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 09:36:49 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.03s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP29919/SYN/SYN478-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ........................................................................................................................................................................................................ done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 16] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 252] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 488] [nf = 4] [nu = 4] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 2286] [nf = 86] [nu = 8] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 9102] [nf = 870] [nu = 90] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 15918] [nf = 1654] [nu = 172] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 22810] [nf = 2490] [nu = 254] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 29702] [nf = 3326] [nu = 336] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 36669] [nf = 4228] [nu = 418] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 43636] [nf = 5130] [nu = 500] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 50603] [nf = 6032] [nu = 582] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 57570] [nf = 6934] [nu = 664] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 64537] [nf = 7836] [nu = 746] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 71504] [nf = 8738] [nu = 828] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 78471] [nf = 9640] [nu = 910] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 85438] [nf = 10542] [nu = 992] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 92405] [nf = 11444] [nu = 1074] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 99372] [nf = 12346] [nu = 1156] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 106339] [nf = 13248] [nu = 1238] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 20 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 113306] [nf = 14150] [nu = 1320] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 21 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 120273] [nf = 15052] [nu = 1402] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 22 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 127240] [nf = 15954] [nu = 1484] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 23 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 134207] [nf = 16856] [nu = 1566] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 24 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 141174] [nf = 17758] [nu = 1648] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 25 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 148141] [nf = 18660] [nu = 1730] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 26 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 155108] [nf = 19562] [nu = 1812] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 27 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 162075] [nf = 20464] [nu = 1894] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 28 ...
% t = 4 secs [nr = 169042] [nf = 21366] [nu = 1976] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 29 ...
% t = 4 secs [nr = 176009] [nf = 22268] [nu = 2058] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 30 ...
% t = 4 secs [nr = 182976] [nf = 23170] [nu = 2140] [ut = 1]
% Restarting search with different parameters.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 4 secs [nr = 182992] [nf = 23170] [nu = 2140] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 4 secs [nr = 183228] [nf = 23170] [nu = 2140] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 4 secs [nr = 183464] [nf = 23174] [nu = 2144] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 4 secs [nr = 185403] [nf = 23260] [nu = 2148] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 4 secs [nr = 197085] [nf = 24261] [nu = 2230] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 4 secs [nr = 304139] [nf = 30469] [nu = 2312] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 9 secs [nr = 1524728] [nf = 118126] [nu = 2394] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 51 secs [nr = 10288316] [nf = 1053320] [nu = 2476] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 49813755
% resolvents: 43547149 factors: 6266606
% Number of unit clauses generated: 2558
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.01
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [3] = 1
% Total = 1
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 2558 [2] = 36824 [3] = 267698 [4] = 1187985 [5] = 11201794 [6] = 31240762
% [7] = 5316818 [8] = 549514 [9] = 9802
% Average size of a generated clause: 6.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] hskp0 (+)0 (-)0
% [1] hskp1 (+)0 (-)0
% [2] hskp10 (+)0 (-)0
% [3] hskp11 (+)0 (-)0
% [4] hskp12 (+)0 (-)0
% [5] hskp13 (+)0 (-)0
% [6] hskp14 (+)0 (-)0
% [7] hskp15 (+)0 (-)0
% [8] hskp16 (+)0 (-)0
% [9] hskp17 (+)0 (-)0
% [10] hskp18 (+)0 (-)0
% [11] hskp19 (+)0 (-)0
% [12] hskp2 (+)0 (-)0
% [13] hskp20 (+)0 (-)0
% [14] hskp21 (+)0 (-)0
% [15] hskp22 (+)0 (-)0
% [16] hskp23 (+)0 (-)0
% [17] hskp24 (+)0 (-)0
% [18] hskp25 (+)0 (-)0
% [19] hskp26 (+)0 (-)0
% [20] hskp27 (+)0 (-)0
% [21] hskp28 (+)0 (-)0
% [22] hskp29 (+)0 (-)0
% [23] hskp3 (+)0 (-)0
% [24] hskp30 (+)0 (-)0
% [25] hskp4 (+)0 (-)0
% [26] hskp5 (+)0 (-)0
% [27] hskp6 (+)0 (-)0
% [28] hskp7 (+)0 (-)0
% [29] hskp8 (+)0 (-)0
% [30] hskp9 (+)0 (-)0
% [31] ndr1_0 (+)1 (-)0
% [32] c0_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [33] c1_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [34] c2_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [35] c3_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% ------------------
% Total: (+)1 (-)0
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 1
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 298843409
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 778328376
% Number of successful unifications: 49813755
% Number of unification failures: 139725747
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 2476471588
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 3745411564
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 2
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 163
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 0
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 0
% Number of states in UCFA table: 2
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 0
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: inf
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 101
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 189539502
% ConstructUnitClause() = 164
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.00 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 166046
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 303 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------