TSTP Solution File: SYN476-1 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : SYN476-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.1.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art02.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 09:36:13 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.04s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP8183/SYN/SYN476-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ........................................................................................................................................................................................................ done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 8] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 156] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 304] [nf = 2] [nu = 2] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 1532] [nf = 58] [nu = 4] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 6239] [nf = 600] [nu = 60] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 10946] [nf = 1142] [nu = 116] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 15754] [nf = 1754] [nu = 172] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 20562] [nf = 2366] [nu = 228] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 25424] [nf = 3024] [nu = 284] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 30286] [nf = 3682] [nu = 340] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 35148] [nf = 4340] [nu = 396] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 40010] [nf = 4998] [nu = 452] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 44872] [nf = 5656] [nu = 508] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 49734] [nf = 6314] [nu = 564] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 54596] [nf = 6972] [nu = 620] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 59458] [nf = 7630] [nu = 676] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 64320] [nf = 8288] [nu = 732] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 69182] [nf = 8946] [nu = 788] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 74044] [nf = 9604] [nu = 844] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 20 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 78906] [nf = 10262] [nu = 900] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 21 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 83768] [nf = 10920] [nu = 956] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 22 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 88630] [nf = 11578] [nu = 1012] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 23 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 93492] [nf = 12236] [nu = 1068] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 24 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 98354] [nf = 12894] [nu = 1124] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 25 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 103216] [nf = 13552] [nu = 1180] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 26 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 108078] [nf = 14210] [nu = 1236] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 27 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 112940] [nf = 14868] [nu = 1292] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 28 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 117802] [nf = 15526] [nu = 1348] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 29 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 122664] [nf = 16184] [nu = 1404] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 30 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 127526] [nf = 16842] [nu = 1460] [ut = 1]
% Restarting search with different parameters.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 127534] [nf = 16842] [nu = 1460] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 127682] [nf = 16842] [nu = 1460] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 127830] [nf = 16844] [nu = 1462] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 129058] [nf = 16900] [nu = 1464] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 135513] [nf = 17495] [nu = 1520] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 217015] [nf = 22145] [nu = 1576] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 6 secs [nr = 1137164] [nf = 90975] [nu = 1632] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a pro
% of at depth = 8 ...
% t = 21 secs [nr = 4311103] [nf = 434385] [nu = 1688] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 163 secs [nr = 22792082] [nf = 2839820] [nu = 1744] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 47972126
% resolvents: 42498013 factors: 5474113
% Number of unit clauses generated: 1772
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.00
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [3] = 1
% Total = 1
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 1772 [2] = 25388 [3] = 195380 [4] = 1204406 [5] = 8968921 [6] = 21955428
% [7] = 13216324 [8] = 2343480 [9] = 61027
% Average size of a generated clause: 7.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] hskp0 (+)0 (-)0
% [1] hskp1 (+)0 (-)0
% [2] hskp10 (+)0 (-)0
% [3] hskp11 (+)0 (-)0
% [4] hskp12 (+)0 (-)0
% [5] hskp13 (+)0 (-)0
% [6] hskp14 (+)0 (-)0
% [7] hskp15 (+)0 (-)0
% [8] hskp16 (+)0 (-)0
% [9] hskp17 (+)0 (-)0
% [10] hskp18 (+)0 (-)0
% [11] hskp19 (+)0 (-)0
% [12] hskp2 (+)0 (-)0
% [13] hskp20 (+)0 (-)0
% [14] hskp21 (+)0 (-)0
% [15] hskp22 (+)0 (-)0
% [16] hskp23 (+)0 (-)0
% [17] hskp24 (+)0 (-)0
% [18] hskp25 (+)0 (-)0
% [19] hskp26 (+)0 (-)0
% [20] hskp27 (+)0 (-)0
% [21] hskp28 (+)0 (-)0
% [22] hskp29 (+)0 (-)0
% [23] hskp3 (+)0 (-)0
% [24] hskp30 (+)0 (-)0
% [25] hskp31 (+)0 (-)0
% [26] hskp4 (+)0 (-)0
% [27] hskp5 (+)0 (-)0
% [28] hskp6 (+)0 (-)0
% [29] hskp7 (+)0 (-)0
% [30] hskp8 (+)0 (-)0
% [31] hskp9 (+)0 (-)0
% [32] ndr1_0 (+)1 (-)0
% [33] c0_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [34] c1_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [35] c2_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [36] c3_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% ------------------
% Total: (+)1 (-)0
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 1
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 237223311
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 1587986284
% Number of successful unifications: 47972126
% Number of unification failures: 86328747
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 2196741350
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 2796054595
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 2
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 111
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 0
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 0
% Number of states in UCFA table: 2
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 0
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: inf
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 103
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 134300873
% ConstructUnitClause() = 112
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.00 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 159907
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 303 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------