TSTP Solution File: SYN475-1 by CARINE---0.734

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CARINE---0.734
% Problem  : SYN475-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : add_equality
% Format   : carine
% Command  : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000

% Computer : art03.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : i686 i686
% CPU      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory   : 2018MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 09:36:04 EST 2010

% Result   : Timeout 300.06s
% Output   : None 
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP3053/SYN/SYN475-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ................................................................................................................................................................................................ done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 108] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 216] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 1404] [nf = 54] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 6069] [nf = 594] [nu = 54] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 10734] [nf = 1134] [nu = 108] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 15488] [nf = 1732] [nu = 162] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 20242] [nf = 2330] [nu = 216] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 25083] [nf = 3004] [nu = 270] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 29924] [nf = 3678] [nu = 324] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 34765] [nf = 4352] [nu = 378] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 39606] [nf = 5026] [nu = 432] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 44447] [nf = 5700] [nu = 486] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 49288] [nf = 6374] [nu = 540] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 54129] [nf = 7048] [nu = 594] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 58970] [nf = 7722] [nu = 648] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% 	t = 2 secs [nr = 63811] [nf = 8396] [nu = 702] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% 	t = 2 secs [nr = 68652] [nf = 9070] [nu = 756] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ...
% 	t = 2 secs [nr = 73493] [nf = 9744] [nu = 810] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 20 ...
% 	t = 2 secs [nr = 78334] [nf = 10418] [nu = 864] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 21 ...
% 	t = 2 secs [nr = 83175] [nf = 11092] [nu = 918] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 22 ...
% 	t = 2 secs [nr = 88016] [nf = 11766] [nu = 972] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 23 ...
% 	t = 2 secs [nr = 92857] [nf = 12440] [nu = 1026] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 24 ...
% 	t = 2 secs [nr = 97698] [nf = 13114] [nu = 1080] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 25 ...
% 	t = 2 secs [nr = 102539] [nf = 13788] [nu = 1134] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 26 ...
% 	t = 2 secs [nr = 107380] [nf = 14462] [nu = 1188] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 27 ...
% 	t = 2 secs [nr = 112221] [nf = 15136] [nu = 1242] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 28 ...
% 	t = 2 secs [nr = 117062] [nf = 15810] [nu = 1296] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 29 ...
% 	t = 2 secs [nr = 121903] [nf = 16484] [nu = 1350] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 30 ...
% 	t = 3 secs [nr = 126744] [nf = 17158] [nu = 1404] [ut = 1]
% Restarting search with different parameters.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% 	t = 3 secs [nr = 126744] [nf = 17158] [nu = 1404] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% 	t = 3 secs [nr = 126852] [nf = 17158] [nu = 1404] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% 	t = 3 secs [nr = 126960] [nf = 17158] [nu = 1404] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% 	t = 3 secs [nr = 128287] [nf = 17215] [nu = 1404] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% 	t = 3 secs [nr = 137235] [nf = 17896] [nu = 1458] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% 	t = 3 secs [nr = 214926] [nf = 22490] [nu = 1512] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% 	t = 6 secs [nr = 1062950] [nf = 86937] [nu = 1566] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at dep
% th = 8 ...
% 	t = 34 secs [nr = 6962352] [nf = 749186] [nu = 1620] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% 	t = 252 secs [nr = 33862694] [nf = 5603744] [nu = 1674] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% |                Statistics                 |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 46707838
% 	resolvents: 39976608	factors: 6731230
% Number of unit clauses generated: 1678
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.00
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [5] = 1		
% Total = 1
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 1678	[2] = 24214	[3] = 202205	[4] = 1147378	[5] = 10654045	[6] = 25921939	
% [7] = 7092553	[8] = 1620540	[9] = 43286	
% Average size of a generated clause: 6.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] hskp0		(+)0	(-)0
% [1] hskp1		(+)0	(-)0
% [2] hskp10		(+)0	(-)0
% [3] hskp11		(+)0	(-)0
% [4] hskp12		(+)0	(-)0
% [5] hskp13		(+)0	(-)0
% [6] hskp14		(+)0	(-)0
% [7] hskp15		(+)0	(-)0
% [8] hskp16		(+)0	(-)0
% [9] hskp17		(+)0	(-)0
% [10] hskp18		(+)0	(-)0
% [11] hskp19		(+)0	(-)0
% [12] hskp2		(+)0	(-)0
% [13] hskp20		(+)0	(-)0
% [14] hskp21		(+)0	(-)0
% [15] hskp22		(+)0	(-)0
% [16] hskp23		(+)0	(-)0
% [17] hskp24		(+)0	(-)0
% [18] hskp25		(+)0	(-)0
% [19] hskp26		(+)0	(-)0
% [20] hskp27		(+)0	(-)0
% [21] hskp28		(+)0	(-)0
% [22] hskp29		(+)0	(-)0
% [23] hskp3		(+)0	(-)0
% [24] hskp4		(+)0	(-)0
% [25] hskp5		(+)0	(-)0
% [26] hskp6		(+)0	(-)0
% [27] hskp7		(+)0	(-)0
% [28] hskp8		(+)0	(-)0
% [29] hskp9		(+)0	(-)0
% [30] ndr1_0		(+)1	(-)0
% [31] c0_1_1		(+)0	(-)0
% [32] c1_1_1		(+)0	(-)0
% [33] c2_1_1		(+)0	(-)0
% [34] c3_1_1		(+)0	(-)0
% 			------------------
% 		Total:	(+)1	(-)0
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 1
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 247685088
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% 	because of the shortest resolvents table: 1030673226
% Number of successful unifications: 46707838
% Number of unification failures: 135493372
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 2428309247
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 3612001065
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 2
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 107
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 0
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 0
% Number of states in UCFA table: 2
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 0
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: inf
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 99
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 182201210
% ConstructUnitClause() = 108
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.00 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% |                                                      |
%   Inferences per sec: 155693
% |                                                      |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 303 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------