TSTP Solution File: SYN473-1 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : SYN473-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.1.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art04.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 09:34:50 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.04s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP10188/SYN/SYN473-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing .................................................................................................................................................................................................... done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 84] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 168] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 1092] [nf = 42] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 4735] [nf = 462] [nu = 42] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 8378] [nf = 882] [nu = 84] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 12087] [nf = 1346] [nu = 126] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 15796] [nf = 1810] [nu = 168] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 19587] [nf = 2344] [nu = 210] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 23378] [nf = 2878] [nu = 252] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 27169] [nf = 3412] [nu = 294] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 30960] [nf = 3946] [nu = 336] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 34751] [nf = 4480] [nu = 378] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 38542] [nf = 5014] [nu = 420] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 42333] [nf = 5548] [nu = 462] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 46124] [nf = 6082] [nu = 504] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 49915] [nf = 6616] [nu = 546] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 53706] [nf = 7150] [nu = 588] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 57497] [nf = 7684] [nu = 630] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 20 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 61288] [nf = 8218] [nu = 672] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 21 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 65079] [nf = 8752] [nu = 714] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 22 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 68870] [nf = 9286] [nu = 756] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 23 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 72661] [nf = 9820] [nu = 798] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 24 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 76452] [nf = 10354] [nu = 840] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 25 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 80243] [nf = 10888] [nu = 882] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 26 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 84034] [nf = 11422] [nu = 924] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 27 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 87825] [nf = 11956] [nu = 966] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 28 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 91616] [nf = 12490] [nu = 1008] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 29 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 95407] [nf = 13024] [nu = 1050] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 30 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 99198] [nf = 13558] [nu = 1092] [ut = 1]
% Restarting search with different parameters.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 99198] [nf = 13558] [nu = 1092] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 99282] [nf = 13558] [nu = 1092] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 99366] [nf = 13558] [nu = 1092] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 100290] [nf = 13600] [nu = 1092] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 106223] [nf = 14082] [nu = 1134] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 202016] [nf = 19406] [nu = 1176] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 5 secs [nr = 1195107] [nf = 94258] [nu = 1218] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 2
% 0 secs [nr = 4175797] [nf = 458637] [nu = 1260] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 154 secs [nr = 20666916] [nf = 2947741] [nu = 1302] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 45517516
% resolvents: 39881242 factors: 5636274
% Number of unit clauses generated: 1316
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.00
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [5] = 1
% Total = 1
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 1316 [2] = 20636 [3] = 193271 [4] = 1391709 [5] = 9123451 [6] = 20249098
% [7] = 12939661 [8] = 1563444 [9] = 34930
% Average size of a generated clause: 7.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] hskp0 (+)0 (-)0
% [1] hskp1 (+)0 (-)0
% [2] hskp10 (+)0 (-)0
% [3] hskp11 (+)0 (-)0
% [4] hskp12 (+)0 (-)0
% [5] hskp13 (+)0 (-)0
% [6] hskp14 (+)0 (-)0
% [7] hskp15 (+)0 (-)0
% [8] hskp16 (+)0 (-)0
% [9] hskp17 (+)0 (-)0
% [10] hskp18 (+)0 (-)0
% [11] hskp19 (+)0 (-)0
% [12] hskp2 (+)0 (-)0
% [13] hskp20 (+)0 (-)0
% [14] hskp21 (+)0 (-)0
% [15] hskp22 (+)0 (-)0
% [16] hskp23 (+)0 (-)0
% [17] hskp24 (+)0 (-)0
% [18] hskp25 (+)0 (-)0
% [19] hskp26 (+)0 (-)0
% [20] hskp27 (+)0 (-)0
% [21] hskp28 (+)0 (-)0
% [22] hskp29 (+)0 (-)0
% [23] hskp3 (+)0 (-)0
% [24] hskp30 (+)0 (-)0
% [25] hskp4 (+)0 (-)0
% [26] hskp5 (+)0 (-)0
% [27] hskp6 (+)0 (-)0
% [28] hskp7 (+)0 (-)0
% [29] hskp8 (+)0 (-)0
% [30] hskp9 (+)0 (-)0
% [31] ndr1_0 (+)1 (-)0
% [32] c0_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [33] c1_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [34] c2_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [35] c3_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% ------------------
% Total: (+)1 (-)0
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 1
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 269119098
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 1799012217
% Number of successful unifications: 45517516
% Number of unification failures: 80494199
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 2064323261
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 2634432786
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 2
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 83
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 0
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 0
% Number of states in UCFA table: 2
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 0
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: inf
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 101
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 126011715
% ConstructUnitClause() = 84
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.00 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 151725
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 303 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------