TSTP Solution File: SYN472-1 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : SYN472-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.1.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art01.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 09:34:36 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.03s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP20791/SYN/SYN472-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing .................................................................................................................................................................................................... done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 96] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 192] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 1248] [nf = 48] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 5399] [nf = 528] [nu = 48] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 9550] [nf = 1008] [nu = 96] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 13801] [nf = 1556] [nu = 144] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 18052] [nf = 2104] [nu = 192] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 22364] [nf = 2704] [nu = 240] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 26676] [nf = 3304] [nu = 288] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 30988] [nf = 3904] [nu = 336] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 35300] [nf = 4504] [nu = 384] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 39612] [nf = 5104] [nu = 432] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 43924] [nf = 5704] [nu = 480] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 48236] [nf = 6304] [nu = 528] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 52548] [nf = 6904] [nu = 576] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 56860] [nf = 7504] [nu = 624] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 61172] [nf = 8104] [nu = 672] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 65484] [nf = 8704] [nu = 720] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 20 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 69796] [nf = 9304] [nu = 768] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 21 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 74108] [nf = 9904] [nu = 816] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 22 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 78420] [nf = 10504] [nu = 864] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 23 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 82732] [nf = 11104] [nu = 912] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 24 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 87044] [nf = 11704] [nu = 960] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 25 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 91356] [nf = 12304] [nu = 1008] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 26 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 95668] [nf = 12904] [nu = 1056] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 27 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 99980] [nf = 13504] [nu = 1104] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 28 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 104292] [nf = 14104] [nu = 1152] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 29 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 108604] [nf = 14704] [nu = 1200] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 30 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 112916] [nf = 15304] [nu = 1248] [ut = 1]
% Restarting search with different parameters.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 112916] [nf = 15304] [nu = 1248] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 113012] [nf = 15304] [nu = 1248] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 113108] [nf = 15304] [nu = 1248] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 114164] [nf = 15352] [nu = 1248] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 120017] [nf = 15893] [nu = 1296] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 191650] [nf = 20487] [nu = 1344] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 4 secs [nr = 900524] [nf = 76692] [nu = 1392] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8
% ...
% t = 18 secs [nr = 3430859] [nf = 341211] [nu = 1440] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 118 secs [nr = 16000328] [nf = 1921295] [nu = 1488] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 46374707
% resolvents: 41381796 factors: 4992911
% Number of unit clauses generated: 1532
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.00
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [5] = 1
% Total = 1
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 1532 [2] = 22124 [3] = 181760 [4] = 1045902 [5] = 7059418 [6] = 18376744
% [7] = 15755684 [8] = 3824932 [9] = 106611
% Average size of a generated clause: 7.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] hskp0 (+)0 (-)0
% [1] hskp1 (+)0 (-)0
% [2] hskp10 (+)0 (-)0
% [3] hskp11 (+)0 (-)0
% [4] hskp12 (+)0 (-)0
% [5] hskp13 (+)0 (-)0
% [6] hskp14 (+)0 (-)0
% [7] hskp15 (+)0 (-)0
% [8] hskp16 (+)0 (-)0
% [9] hskp17 (+)0 (-)0
% [10] hskp18 (+)0 (-)0
% [11] hskp19 (+)0 (-)0
% [12] hskp2 (+)0 (-)0
% [13] hskp20 (+)0 (-)0
% [14] hskp21 (+)0 (-)0
% [15] hskp22 (+)0 (-)0
% [16] hskp23 (+)0 (-)0
% [17] hskp24 (+)0 (-)0
% [18] hskp25 (+)0 (-)0
% [19] hskp26 (+)0 (-)0
% [20] hskp27 (+)0 (-)0
% [21] hskp28 (+)0 (-)0
% [22] hskp29 (+)0 (-)0
% [23] hskp3 (+)0 (-)0
% [24] hskp30 (+)0 (-)0
% [25] hskp4 (+)0 (-)0
% [26] hskp5 (+)0 (-)0
% [27] hskp6 (+)0 (-)0
% [28] hskp7 (+)0 (-)0
% [29] hskp8 (+)0 (-)0
% [30] hskp9 (+)0 (-)0
% [31] ndr1_0 (+)1 (-)0
% [32] c0_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [33] c1_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [34] c2_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [35] c3_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% ------------------
% Total: (+)1 (-)0
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 1
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 228544965
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 1916793831
% Number of successful unifications: 46374707
% Number of unification failures: 72427384
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 2050347559
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 2450299123
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 2
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 95
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 0
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 0
% Number of states in UCFA table: 2
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 0
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: inf
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 101
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 118802091
% ConstructUnitClause() = 96
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.00 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 154582
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 305 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------