TSTP Solution File: SYN471-1 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : SYN471-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.1.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art05.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 09:34:16 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.04s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP1725/SYN/SYN471-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ........................................................................................................................................................................................................ done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 8] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 144] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 280] [nf = 2] [nu = 2] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 1378] [nf = 52] [nu = 4] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 5571] [nf = 534] [nu = 54] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 9764] [nf = 1016] [nu = 104] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 14023] [nf = 1540] [nu = 154] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 18282] [nf = 2064] [nu = 204] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 22645] [nf = 2678] [nu = 254] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 27008] [nf = 3292] [nu = 304] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 31371] [nf = 3906] [nu = 354] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 35734] [nf = 4520] [nu = 404] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 40097] [nf = 5134] [nu = 454] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 44460] [nf = 5748] [nu = 504] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 48823] [nf = 6362] [nu = 554] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 53186] [nf = 6976] [nu = 604] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 57549] [nf = 7590] [nu = 654] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 61912] [nf = 8204] [nu = 704] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 66275] [nf = 8818] [nu = 754] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 20 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 70638] [nf = 9432] [nu = 804] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 21 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 75001] [nf = 10046] [nu = 854] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 22 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 79364] [nf = 10660] [nu = 904] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 23 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 83727] [nf = 11274] [nu = 954] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 24 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 88090] [nf = 11888] [nu = 1004] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 25 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 92453] [nf = 12502] [nu = 1054] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 26 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 96816] [nf = 13116] [nu = 1104] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 27 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 101179] [nf = 13730] [nu = 1154] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 28 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 105542] [nf = 14344] [nu = 1204] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 29 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 109905] [nf = 14958] [nu = 1254] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 30 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 114268] [nf = 15572] [nu = 1304] [ut = 1]
% Restarting search with different parameters.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 114276] [nf = 15572] [nu = 1304] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 114412] [nf = 15572] [nu = 1304] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 114548] [nf = 15574] [nu = 1306] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 115790] [nf = 15626] [nu = 1308] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 125031] [nf = 16245] [nu = 1358] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 220817] [nf = 21266] [nu = 1408] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 6 secs [nr = 1200525] [nf = 90992] [nu = 1458] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at
% depth = 8 ...
% t = 33 secs [nr = 6128261] [nf = 640941] [nu = 1508] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 252 secs [nr = 33819209] [nf = 4809249] [nu = 1558] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 47692212
% resolvents: 41598747 factors: 6093465
% Number of unit clauses generated: 1572
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.00
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [3] = 1
% Total = 1
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 1572 [2] = 24778 [3] = 217970 [4] = 1246980 [5] = 10193229 [6] = 27003408
% [7] = 7768823 [8] = 1188122 [9] = 47330
% Average size of a generated clause: 6.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] hskp0 (+)0 (-)0
% [1] hskp1 (+)0 (-)0
% [2] hskp10 (+)0 (-)0
% [3] hskp11 (+)0 (-)0
% [4] hskp12 (+)0 (-)0
% [5] hskp13 (+)0 (-)0
% [6] hskp14 (+)0 (-)0
% [7] hskp15 (+)0 (-)0
% [8] hskp16 (+)0 (-)0
% [9] hskp17 (+)0 (-)0
% [10] hskp18 (+)0 (-)0
% [11] hskp19 (+)0 (-)0
% [12] hskp2 (+)0 (-)0
% [13] hskp20 (+)0 (-)0
% [14] hskp21 (+)0 (-)0
% [15] hskp22 (+)0 (-)0
% [16] hskp23 (+)0 (-)0
% [17] hskp24 (+)0 (-)0
% [18] hskp25 (+)0 (-)0
% [19] hskp26 (+)0 (-)0
% [20] hskp27 (+)0 (-)0
% [21] hskp28 (+)0 (-)0
% [22] hskp29 (+)0 (-)0
% [23] hskp3 (+)0 (-)0
% [24] hskp30 (+)0 (-)0
% [25] hskp31 (+)0 (-)0
% [26] hskp4 (+)0 (-)0
% [27] hskp5 (+)0 (-)0
% [28] hskp6 (+)0 (-)0
% [29] hskp7 (+)0 (-)0
% [30] hskp8 (+)0 (-)0
% [31] hskp9 (+)0 (-)0
% [32] ndr1_0 (+)1 (-)0
% [33] c0_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [34] c1_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [35] c2_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [36] c3_1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% ------------------
% Total: (+)1 (-)0
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 1
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 241562619
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 1167719673
% Number of successful unifications: 47692212
% Number of unification failures: 122556052
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 2342128714
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 3334375476
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 2
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 99
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 0
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 0
% Number of states in UCFA table: 2
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 0
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: inf
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 103
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 170248264
% ConstructUnitClause() = 100
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.00 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 158974
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 304 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------